I think the cases will leave many of you with your lower jaw hanging down.
- Based on graphics on corporate presentations, CLR's estimates of recoverable oil in the Bakken, and a realization that fracking doesn't extend more than 500 feet from the borehole, I thought we would see as many as four wells in a section. I underestimated
- I do not recall so many cases in which operators wanted to flare gas, in general to allow unrestricted production of oil; I assume many of these operators need the cash flow to keep operating
- There are a couple new operators that I had not seen before
- Corinthian Exploration, which just acquired the Ritchie Spearfish wells in Bottineau County as a request for 240 Spearfish wells in Bottineau County
- CLR, Slawson, others are now putting in infill wells, as noted above, with as many as 7 wells/1280-acre unit; in some cases, the density may be almost double (such as 6 wells in 640-acre units)
- Burlington Resources will be putting in an additional 12 wells in 1280-acre spacing units where there is already a long lateral: thus, BR will be putting in as many as 13 long laterals in one 1280-acre units; BR has identified two such units for 13 wells each
Even the fields that produce mediocre wells, they are being fully developed.
I was not impressed with Oil for America's Zastoupil well, but it must be good enough to keep producing; the operator has asked for temporary spacing (case 14541).
I think temp spacing is a legal thing so a field can be developed. The Darwin lodgepole spacing came up last month and marathon basically said the well is not profitable don't make a field. I do think however that a more aggressive frac job and longer lateral could make a go of things. I'll make a note to read the hearing to see if the well is viable for zast well.
ReplyDelete