- 20529,
- 20530,
- 34601, drl/A, MRO, Salveson USA 24-21H, 33-061-04204; Reunion Bay, t--; cum 170K 3.5 months; a 54K month; fracked 1/12/2020 - 1/26/2020, 8.3 million gallons of water; 99.99965% water by mass;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 5-2020 | 31 | 35603 | 35645 | 20017 | 52348 | 0 | 50209 |
BAKKEN | 4-2020 | 30 | 53827 | 53895 | 45437 | 65539 | 0 | 62381 |
BAKKEN | 3-2020 | 29 | 46754 | 46820 | 44990 | 52231 | 0 | 49489 |
BAKKEN | 2-2020 | 15 | 33998 | 33589 | 65974 | 40193 | 0 | 3821 |
- 34602, drl/A, MRO, Gerhardt USA 14-21H, 33-061-04205; Reunion Bay, t--; cum 145K 3 months; a 56K month; fracked 1/12/2020 - 2/10/2020; 7.7 million gallons of water; all water?
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 5-2020 | 31 | 31310 | 31352 | 16385 | 43477 | 0 | 41605 |
BAKKEN | 4-2020 | 30 | 48352 | 48515 | 39310 | 58332 | 0 | 55495 |
BAKKEN | 3-2020 | 30 | 55850 | 55549 | 43312 | 59891 | 0 | 56616 |
BAKKEN | 2-2020 | 5 | 9038 | 8929 | 8337 | 9030 | 0 | 8507 |
FracFocus, screenshots:
34601:
34602:
The five wells on that pad:
- 34601, see above,
- 34602, see above,
- 34598, drl/NC, MRO, Hanlon USA 11-28TFH, 33-061-04201, Reunion Bay, t--; cum 92K 3 months; fracked 2/1/20 -2/10/20; 7.5 million gallons of water; no sand listed;
- 34599, drl/NC, MRO, McRoberts USA 14-21TFH, 33-061-04202, Reunion Bay, t--; cum 101K 3.5 months; fracked 1/27/20 -2/10/20; 7.6 million gallons of water; no sand listed;
- 34600, drl/NC, MRO, Verne USA 24-21TFH, 33-061-04203, Reunion Bay, t--; cum 160K 4 months; a 52K month; fracked 1/12/20 -1/25/20; 8.3 million gallons of water; no sand listed; water by mass, 99.99967%;
Interesting, no question that Marathons new strategy include an increase in water volume, and now this? Pressure causes flow... so it seems to work.
ReplyDeleteI'm still not sure what this all about. FracFocus may not have correct data, but that's hard to believe. The question is, if this is accurate, all water and no sand, what is going on? I have an idea but I don't want to waste time hypothesizing when there may be an error -- I really can't believe they did not use sand. But we'll see when the sundry forms are scanned by the NDIC and posted.
Delete