Updates
February 12, 2015: Some folks have noted the "huge" Whiting wells in Moccasin Creek, Dunn County. See comments. Yes, these are huge wells; I was hoping folks would notice. It will be interesting to compare long-term production of these Whiting wells compared with KOG wells (yes, these were originally KOG permits/wells bought by Whiting). Whiting announced enhanced fracking / completions in the future some time ago. When they post the fracking data, I will post some examples (if I remember).
Original Post
Hints that Blackrock thinks that "Big Oil" has bottomed. Link here. Note the wording. See disclaimer.
Active rigs:
2/9/2015 | 02/09/2014 | 02/09/2013 | 02/09/2012 | 02/09/2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active Rigs | 137 | 192 | 185 | 203 | 163 |
Well name changes perhaps due to slump in oil prices:
- CLR is now targeting the middle Bakken with two Cuskelly wells (#29708, #29710); they were targeting the second bench and the first bench of the Three Forks, respectively.
- Operators: MRO (4), HRC (2), Petro-Hunt
- Fields: Reunion Bay (Mountrail), McGregory Buttes (Dunn), Charlson (McKenzie)
- Comments:
- 25587, 3,465, Whiting, Moccasin Creek 14-33-28-4H, Moccasin, t1/15; cum --
- 25588, 2,750, Whiting, Moccasin Creek 14-33-28-4H3, Moccasin, t1/15; cum --
- 27360, 1,114, Emerald, Slugger 7-16-21H, Charbonneau, t12/14; cum 10K 12/14;
- 28301, 1,735, XTO, Omlid 41X-13G, Siverston, t1/15; cum --
Those are some big kog wells. Did kog ever have anything similar pre WLL in NE Dunn? Are there any other NE Dunn well similar? I don't recall seeing such big numbers in NE Dunn before.
ReplyDeleteIt would appear Whitings completion technique is superior.
I agree, I noticed the same thing. These are huge wells, based on IPs; it will be interesting to track these wells over time vs KOG well in the same area.. Whiting announced enhanced completion/fracking techniques a while ago.
DeleteI track Moccasin Creek wells here: http://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2013/05/kog-reports-nice-well-on-320-acre.html