May 22, 2020: production updated; production data here;
January 28, 2019: production data updated; see below;
August 5, 2017: 18047, Teton 21-3H, recently taken off-line; also, #29428 also taken off-line recently; re-fracking one or the other?
August 12, 2015: with regard to the Kings Canyon wells, we have some new information -- from an update elsewhere --
#29434, 1,080, BR, Kings Canyon 3-1-27MTFH; 36 stages, 4 million lbs; t7/15; cum 118K 2/21; off line as of 8/19; back on line 2/20; is an important well from standpoint of understanding "legal" names of BR Kings Canyon wells in Camel Butte. In the original post below, written a long time ago, I suggested that the "M" in MTF stood for "middle Three Forks," a new term for me. In the old days, it was simply the upper Three Forks that was targeted whenever we saw "TF" in the legal name. Shortly thereafter, operators starting talking about the four benches in the Three Forks, and the "upper TF" became TF1, the first bench. Now, we see "middle Three Forks. In the application, this is identified as Three Forks B2 (second bench). From the well file, for #29434, "the Middle Three Forks Formation [in this location] is a 20-foot-thick zone (~ 52' below the base of the Lower Bakken Shale)." Later in the report, the target zone lithology was said to have been taken 13 - 30' below the base of the Lower Bakken Shale. Another interesting note: this is a 2560-acre stand-up drilling unit; this well is sited in the northernmost section 339 feet from the north line, and then runs south, as a long lateral. Formation tops:September 19, 2014: in today's daily activity report, seven more BR Teton / Kings Canyon wells to be drilled in Camel Butte:
- KOP: 10,400'
- Carrington State: 10,766'
- Scallion: 10,772'
- Upper Bakken Shale: 10,789'
- Middle Bakken: 10,819'
- Lower Bakken Shale: 10.885'
- Upper Three Forks: 10,936'
a 4-well pad in the SWSE quadrant of section 10-150-96 (right next to the SESW pad in same section 10):September 18, 2014: from a reader -- see first comment -- There is also a 4-well pad in section 10, kitty corner, southwest to section 34. Despite the different names, they are all on the same pad, lot 1 section 4-150-96:
a 3-well pad in the NESE quadrant of section 34-151-96:
- 29461, 2,926, BR, RemingTeton 8-8-10MBH ULW, Blue Buttes, t7/15; cum 313K 2/21;
- 29462, 2,565, BR, Teton 8-8-10TFSH, Camel Butte, t7/5; cum 197K 2/21;
- 29463, 2,645, BR, Teton 7-8-10MBH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 293K 2/21; back on line 2/20;
- 29464, 2,525, BR, Teton 6-8-10MBH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 284K 2/21;
- 29465, 2,565, BR, Teton 7-1-3TFSH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 205K 2/21;
- 29466, 2,124, BR, Kings Canyon 8-7-8-34MBH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 258K 2/21;
- 29467, 1,566, BR, Kings Canyon 6-8-34UTFH, Camel Butte, t8/15; cum 208K 2/21;
- 29048, 2,112, BR, Teton 2-1-MTFH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 162K 2/21; back on line 2/20;
- 29049, 1,560, BR, Tetonnorman 1-1-3UTFH, ULW, Johnson Corner, t6/15; cum 272K 2/21;
- 29050, 1,584, BR, Kings Canyon 2-8-34UTFH, Camel Butte, 4 sections, KOP - Dec 16; TD - Dec 21, 2015; 17 - 48 feet below the base of the lower Bakken shale; t7/15; cum 237K 2/21; back on line 2/20;
- 29051, 2.064, BR, DeKing 1-8-34MBH-ULW, Camel Butte, t6/15; cum 341K 2/21;
[In these long notes, I don't often take time to proofread them two or three times. There may be typographical and/or factual errors. I have no formal training and no background in the oil and gas industry. No one should make any financial decisions, or otherwise, based on anything they read here or think they read here. With regard to the Bakken I make every effort to be as accurate as possible, but I blog quickly and don't double- or triple-check most things. (With all non-Bakken items, expect satire, parody, humor, sarcasm, opinions, factual errors, etc.) With regard to the posted information, I could use Microsoft Word to do the same thing but it would be more cumbersome; HTML works much better. See "Welcome/Disclaimer." I elected to share the HTML as a "blog" for various reasons. If anything appears wrong on the blog, it probably is. I try hard to link sources for everything posted. Go to sources.]
Refer to the graphic below.
In today's daily activity report, BR was issued twelve (12) permits in Camel Butte oil field. Four wells will be placed on each of three pads. I noted the designations (which may have been used earlier, but if so, I've missed them, or never paid any attention).
The three pads are designated by the "red rectangles" in the graphic above, in sections 10, 27, and 34.
The following wells will be placed on each of the three pads, as noted:
SWSE 34-151-96
- 29423, 1,608, BR, Kings Canyon 4-8-34UTFH, Camel Butte, 4 sections, pay target 24 feet thick; low background gas, moderately high trip gas; t7/15; cum 184K 2/21;
- 29424, 1,200, Kings Canyon 4-8-34MBH, Camel Butte, t8/15; cum 195K 2/21;
- 29425, 1,608, Kings Canyon 5-8-34UTFH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 136K 2/21;
- 29426, 2,040, BR, Teton 5-1-3TFSH, Camel Butte, 4 sections, t7/15; cum 241K 2/21;
- 29465, 2,565, BR, Teton 7-1-3TFSH, Camel Butte, 4 sections, pay target 18 feet thick, t7/15; cum 205K 2/21;
- 29466, 2,124, Kings Canyon 7-8-34MBH, Camel Butte, t7/15; cum 258K 2/21;
- 29467, 1,566, Kings Canyon 6-8-34UTFH, Camel Butte, t8/15; cum 208K 2/21;
- 29517, 2,669, LaCanyon 8-8-34MBH ULW, Blue Buttes, t8/15; cum 404K 2/21;
- 29427, 2,766, Teton 2-8-10MBH, Johnson Corner, t7/15; cum 389K 2/21;
- 29428, 1,844, Teton 3-8-10MBH, Johnson Corner, t7/15; cum 272K 2/21;
- 29429, 2,124, Teton 5-8-10MBH, Johnson Corner, t7/15; cum 172K 2/21;
- 29430, 2,044, Teton 6-8-10TFSH, Johnson Corner, t7/15; cum 182K 2/21;
- 8873, 83, Murex, George Tank 2, Madison/Devonian/Silurian, t8/88; t6/82; t6/82; cum 339K 2/21; cum 86K TA/88 (Devonian); dry (Silurian); Camel Butte,
- 18018, 321, BR, Kings Canyon 21-27H, Camel Butte, t12/09; cum 312K 2/21;
- 29431, IA/1,848, Kings Canyon 6-1-27MBH, t7/15; cum 176K 2/21;
- 29432, 1,560, Kings Canyon 6-1-27MTFH, t8/15; cum 162K 2/21;
- 29433, 1,464, Kings Canyon 4-1-27MTFH, t7/15; cum 127K 12/20; off line;
- 29434, 1,080, Kings Canyon 3-1-27MTFH, t8/15; cum 118K 2/21; was off-line 10/16 - 4/17;
I am assuming the "M" does not stand for monitoring, but of course that's always a possibility.
The usual designation for a horizontal in the middle Bakken is: MBH (sometimes simply "H").
The
usual designation for the Three Forks Sanish, also often referred to as
the upper Three Forks, has been TFS. I suppose there might be
horizontals in the TFS designated as TFSH.
I could be
wrong, but I believe what we used to call the TFS, is now the upper
Three Forks, and which is now generally referred to as the first bench,
TF1.
The underlying benches are TF2, TF3, and TF4. To
date, it is accepted that some areas in the Williston Basin are
productive in TF2 and TF3, but to the best of my knowledge, TF4 is not
yet recognized as a productive target.
But I haven't seen any operator use those designations (TF1, TF2, or TF3) in the names of their permits/wells.
This is, just as one example, how Oasis "sees" the formations in the Bakken Pool, which I believe is the same way that CLR "sees" the formations:
So, back to the BR permits above.
We have UTFH, MBH, TFSH, and MTFH in the BR permits above.
Until I'm corrected, I am assuming:
- UTFH: upper Three Forks, but because there is also TFSH, this is most likely TF2;
- MTFH: the middle Three Forks, and for the same reason, this is most likely TF3;
- TFSH: the traditional (legacy) upper Three Forks, or TF1; and,
- MBH: middle Bakken, of course.
Section 34, with the "question mark," has "UTFH" and "TFSH" designations.
Section 10, with "MB, TFS" has the traditional "MBH," as well as the "TFSH" designation.
I could be very wrong; maybe BR had earlier permits which could explain all this and I simply missed them.
KOG has its own system for designating the various formations but I haven't sorted them out, nor have I have sorted out designations used by other operators.
- 8873, 44/83/dry; Madison/Devonian/Silurian; 1988; 1982; 1982; Murex, George Tank 2, t8/88; t6/82; cum 336K 8/20; cum 86K 7/88;
And now more unraveling.
CNBC is reporting: "big" Minnesota insurer is leaving ObamaCare site.
The "Blue Ox" of Minnesota Obamacare is calling it quits.
PreferredOne, the insurer that sold nearly 60 percent of all private health plans on Minnesota's Obamacare exchange, on Tuesday said it would leave that marketplace.
PreferredOne's plans were the lowest-cost options on that exchange, known as MNSure.
PreferredOne cited the costs of doing business on MNSure as the reason for its surprising decision, saying that selling plans is "not administratively and financially sustainable going forward," according to KSTP.com, the website of that Minnesota TV News network.
There is also a 3 well pad over in section 4. Permit #29049 TetonNorman 1-13UTFH ULW, Permit #29050 Kings Canyon 2-8-34UTFH, #29051 DeKing 1-8-34MBH-ULW. Notice the combined names on Permits #29049 and #29051 and the abbreviation ULW. These are overlapping spacing units and the ULW stands for Unit Line Well.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting, thank you. It will be interesting to see how these horizontals are laid out; the pad is in Johnson Corner, but the names of one or two of the wells suggest they will be drilling the Camel Butte oil field.
DeleteThank you for taking the time to point this pad. I had missed it.