Wednesday, August 23, 2023

ETFs -- August 23, 2023

Locator: 45463INV.   

Updates

August 24, 2023: are folks even paying attention? The "Qs" are in the news every day it seems, as the "end-all to be-all" it seems. But look at this, with a $50,000 investment in Invesco's QQQ, you have $6,000 in APPL and $44,000 in 98 other individual stocks, none of which by themselves will move the QQQ needle. Why not just put $10,000 in each of the top five each quarter and re-balance every quarter? Yes, on a quarterly basis, not a lot of diversification, but with quarterly re-balancing based on educated "guesses," the diversification improves over time.

August 24, 2023: again, the QQQ has approximately 100 individual equity holdings (see below). Look what an investor can do with an investment of $5,000 or $50,000 in the top ten holdings at the same percentages. On the other side, look at the trivial amount a $500 billion mutual fund would get if it sold all of its Nvidia at the end of the quarter to lock in profit so the manager would get. her bonus -- it would not even move the needle on the fund's return. One has to remember, the fund also bought this equity at some point in the past.

August 24, 2023: why in the world would a serious investor invest in an ETF? Take QQQ, as an example? 

Like BRK, the top ten holdings in QQQ make up about 50% of total dollar value. The next 90 holdings make up the other 50% and not one of the next 90 holdings will ever move the needle for QQQ. And one pays a fee for an ETF. Why not simply start a new Schwab account (free, no fees, no minimu), "buy" the top ten holdings of any ETF one likes, and re-balance every quarter based on what the ETF is doing. 

Original Post

I've never understood the fascination with ETFs. It seems to me, "real" investors could do better.

Example: Invesco QQQ.

Two data points that make me question the fascination of ETFs.

Total expense ratio: 0.20%.

Approximately one hundred holdings. Here are the top 52 before I got bored and quit tallying.

QQQ

July 26, 2023

Apple

11.62%

MSFT

9.95%

AMZN

5.05%

Nvidia

4.30%

Meta

3.48%

Tesla

3.21%

Broadcom

3.13%

GOOG - A

2.77%

GOOG - B

2.75%

Pepsi

2.16%

Costco

2.05%

Adobe

1.97%

Cisco

1.79%

Netflix

1.56%

AMD

1.49%

Comcast

1.47%

T-Mobile

1.40%

Texas Instruuments

1.38%

INTC

1.38%

Honeywell

1.14%

QCOM

1.40%

Intuuit

1.14%

Amgen

1.03%

Starbucks

0.97%

Applied Materials

0.96%

Intuitiv Surgical

0.95%

Booking Holdings

0.89%

Mondelez

0.83%

Automatic Data Processing

0.81%

Analog Devices

0.80%

Gilead

0.79%

Vretex Pharm

0.75%

Lam Research

0.71%

PayPal

0.67%

Regeneron Pharm

0.64%

Palo Alto Networks

0.61%

Micron

0.59%

Synopsys

0.57%

CSX

0.55%

Cadence Design

0.53%

KLA

0.53%

Fortinet

0.50%

AirBnB

0.50%

Monster Beverage

0.50%

ASML 

0.49%

Charter Comm

0.49%

Marriott

0.49%

MercadoLibre

0.49%

O’Reilly Auto

0.48%

NXP Semi

0.47%

Marvell Tech

0.45%

Cintas

0.43%

For those investing in an ETF, such as QQQ, some questions to ponder:
  • do you expect to "make money" investing in QQQ?
  • do you expect QQQ to do better than the NASDAQ as a whole?
  • is there a NASDAQ ETF?
  • if there is a NASDAQ ETF, has it historically done better or worse than the QQQ?
  • could you invest without incurring any expenses? Any fees?
  • can you think of a better way to invest in the NASDAQ?

*******************************
The Book Club

Edvard Muunch, Behind the Scream, Sue Prideaux, c. 2005.

Notes.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.