22158, 996, CLR, Kuhn 2-12H, t5/12; cum 204K 5/13; still producing at 10,000 bbls/month; 29 days to total depth; gas as high as 6,000 units; the seam was 12 feet thick; 60 - 90 foot flares; 40 stages; 3.8 million lbs sand frack; ceramics were not mentioned.CLR just received several permits for more wells next to this one.
This well is a non-descript well on the prairie -- no one would think twice driving by it -- and it's IP was not all that impressive (compared to Statoil IPs) ... and yet ... 200,000 bbls of oil in one year, and it is still producing 9,000 bbls of oil/month. (Except that while drilling it had flares as high as 90 feet which would have been pretty impressive --)
It is not on a pump.
Remember when we used to look for 100,000 bbls in one year? Now, the "new norm" is 200,000 bbls in one year.
And this well would have been less expensive than several years ago:
- pad drilling
- 29 days to total depth vs 60 days in the early days of the boom
- infrastructure in place
- drilling and completion costs have come down in the oil patch; more supply; less demand
And there is a reason I posted the entire stub below. See if you can guess why I posted it.
NDIC File No: 22158 API No: 33-053-03921-00-00 CTB No: 122158
Well Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 4/24/2012 Wellbore type: Horizontal
Location: SESE 12-152-100 Footages: 570 FSL 430 FEL Latitude: 47.994516 Longitude: -103.413536
Current Operator: CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
Current Well Name: KUHN 2-12H
Elevation(s): 2055 KB 2034 GR 2047 GL Total Depth: 21450 Field: CAMP
Spud Date(s): 2/20/2012
Casing String(s): 9.625" 1970' 7" 11210'
Completion Data
Pool: BAKKEN Perfs: 11210-21450 Comp: 4/24/2012 Status: F Date: 5/6/2012 Spacing: 2SEC
Cumulative Production Data
Pool: BAKKEN Cum Oil: 203731 Cum MCF Gas: 280227 Cum Water: 58277
Production Test Data
IP Test Date: 5/6/2012 Pool: BAKKEN IP Oil: 996 IP MCF: 1256 IP Water: 333
Monthly Production DataWell Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 4/24/2012 Wellbore type: Horizontal
Location: SESE 12-152-100 Footages: 570 FSL 430 FEL Latitude: 47.994516 Longitude: -103.413536
Current Operator: CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
Current Well Name: KUHN 2-12H
Elevation(s): 2055 KB 2034 GR 2047 GL Total Depth: 21450 Field: CAMP
Spud Date(s): 2/20/2012
Casing String(s): 9.625" 1970' 7" 11210'
Completion Data
Pool: BAKKEN Perfs: 11210-21450 Comp: 4/24/2012 Status: F Date: 5/6/2012 Spacing: 2SEC
Cumulative Production Data
Pool: BAKKEN Cum Oil: 203731 Cum MCF Gas: 280227 Cum Water: 58277
Production Test Data
IP Test Date: 5/6/2012 Pool: BAKKEN IP Oil: 996 IP MCF: 1256 IP Water: 333
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 5-2013 | 31 | 9253 | 8861 | 2811 | 17863 | 17831 | 32 |
BAKKEN | 4-2013 | 30 | 11025 | 11145 | 3288 | 24648 | 23435 | 1213 |
BAKKEN | 3-2013 | 30 | 11083 | 11026 | 3262 | 13181 | 12893 | 288 |
BAKKEN | 2-2013 | 27 | 11411 | 11653 | 3154 | 17231 | 17017 | 214 |
BAKKEN | 1-2013 | 30 | 13681 | 13344 | 3327 | 17377 | 16823 | 554 |
BAKKEN | 12-2012 | 31 | 15469 | 15383 | 3454 | 21015 | 21015 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2012 | 29 | 16185 | 16370 | 3969 | 16010 | 16010 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2012 | 31 | 19173 | 19273 | 4345 | 25935 | 25935 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2012 | 30 | 18527 | 18235 | 4400 | 24710 | 24710 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 30 | 12089 | 12165 | 3775 | 15757 | 15757 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2012 | 31 | 16856 | 16821 | 4355 | 21363 | 21363 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2012 | 30 | 20517 | 20522 | 5586 | 24862 | 24862 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2012 | 30 | 26063 | 26245 | 8788 | 36974 | 22119 | 14855 |
BAKKEN | 4-2012 | 8 | 2399 | 1827 | 3763 | 3301 | 0 | 3301 |
What caught my eye was the "F" for status. Producing those kind of numbers for an entire year with a well that is flowing is "F" Ah Nom E Nal!
ReplyDeleteIt is also impressive to see they quickly started capturing that 90' flare into a pipeline. Though if I understood your post correctly, perhaps the most astounding thing on this well is it being produced in a location where the formation is just 12' thick. The Bakken is full of surprises.
I posted the entire stub because I wanted to show folks how much natural gas is being captured, also, as you noted.
DeleteI hope I'm correct about the 12-foot seam. I believe that comment was referring to the offset well, so they assumed this would also be a 12-foot seam, but I could be wrong on that, but that's what I saw.
And, of course, yes, no pump after a year: quite phenomenal. I assume this well could come off line for a spell when they start drilling/fracking the new wells in the same area.
Thank you for taking time to comment.