Somewhere on this site (I can't locate it now) I reported that the Dressler 13-1H was dry; someone called me on that suggesting I was mistaken. I linked a site that suggested the well was dry, but now, there is new data to suggest I am wrong.
On the NDIC hearing docket for June 24, Tracker is requesting "temporary spacing to develop an oil and/or gas pool discovered by #13-1H Dressler, NENW 13-142-92, Dunn County." Case No. 10792 (cont'd).
I have to agree; it would be unlikely to request such spacing and state oil/gas discovered if the well was dry. Hmmm. My apologies if I reported wrong.
Perhaps more to follow.
