Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment decisions based on what you read here.
WPX reports: Yahoo! In-Play: WPX Energy misses by $0.11, misses on revs: Reports Q4 (Dec) loss of $0.20 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.11 worse than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of ($0.09); revenues fell 8.0% year/year to $572 mln vs the $634.69 mln consensus. Press release here.
Halcon reports: Yahoo! In-Play: Halcon Resources reports EPS in-line, beats on revs : Reports Q4 (Dec) earnings of $0.02 per share, excluding non-recurring items, in-line with the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate consensus of $0.02; revenues rose 387.1% year/year to $124.7 mln vs the $114.09 mln consensus.
********************
Wells coming off the confidential list have been posted (only two, and one was put on DRL status).
RBN Energy talks about the natural gas situation, the pipelines, Canada and the US in the northeast.
WSJ Links
Section D (Personal Journal):
Section C (Money & Investing):
- Gasoline falls as supply worries ease
- Chevron's Australian shale-gas option; Heard On The Street; very interesting
- JC Penney's losses snowball
- Groupon lands with a thud
- FDA will go to 4-flu vaccine cocktail next year, from current trivalent vaccine
- Boeing, battery supplier at odds over fixes; subscription may be required
- Shell puts off drilling in Alaska's Arctic; reported elsewhere but not previously linked
- Isn't this interesting? Turnabout is fair play? Argentina's YPF inherits New Jersey River mess; New Jersey wants Argentina-run oil company to pay for cleanup of dioxin dumped in Passaic River decades ago; doesn't statute of limitations ever run out?
- The sequester: identical to "going over the fiscal cliff"; go over the "sequester cliff" and then, get serious: both sides bet they'll have a stronger hand after deadline expires; this should catch one's attention: "The first face-to-face meeting on the issue between President Barack Obama and congressional leaders won't happen until Friday—the deadline for Mr. Obama to set in motion $85 billion in broad spending cuts." Question: why couldn't the president simply ignore the law on this one; plenty of other laws of much more importance have been ignored; I wonder what FDR or Reagan would have done?
- Gas boom projected to grow for decades. More discussion here.
- Quietly, SecTreasury confirmed; no links; story everywhere.
- State gun laws being passed faster than ever; no links; stories everywhere.
Bruce - I wonder why all the projected cuts are domestic?Foreign Aid is never mentioned.
ReplyDeleteGreat point. I would assume it's simply political: citizens of other countries generally don't vote in US elections. But foreign aid will take a hit. For example:
DeleteIsrael is set to lose $143 million in foreign aid in 2013 and an additional $32 million in direct military assistance if President Barack Obama and Congress do not work out an agreement to prevent automatic sequestration (google for link).
I believe the sequestration is across the board in discretionary spending, including foreign aid. If Congress acted, they could increase cuts in some areas; decrease cuts in other areas.