Updates
November 15, 2018: production update for #19246:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 30 | 3399 | 3385 | 1458 | 4811 | 4286 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 31 | 3604 | 3586 | 1642 | 5021 | 4464 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 31 | 4339 | 4406 | 2072 | 5585 | 3462 | 1262 |
BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 28 | 4228 | 4220 | 3316 | 5441 | 2204 | 2423 |
BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 27 | 1102 | 1123 | 359 | 1419 | 483 | 437 |
BAKKEN | 4-2018 | 30 | 1327 | 1344 | 534 | 1712 | 1188 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2018 | 31 | 1679 | 1558 | 654 | 2161 | 86 | 1498 |
BAKKEN | 2-2018 | 4 | 123 | 140 | 306 | 241 | 8 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 231 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 8 | 299 | 342 | 179 | 624 | 457 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 1145 | 1105 | 280 | 2034 | 1657 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 31 | 1527 | 1558 | 382 | 2027 | 1465 | 0 |
Original Post
- 19246, 1,425, WPX, Wells 32-29H, Reunion Bay, t3/11; cum 546K 1/18;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 231 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 8 | 299 | 342 | 179 | 624 | 457 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 1145 | 1105 | 280 | 2034 | 1657 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 31 | 1527 | 1558 | 382 | 2027 | 1465 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 28 | 1343 | 1316 | 492 | 1729 | 1051 | 164 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 31 | 2471 | 2505 | 438 | 3180 | 2384 | 137 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 31 | 2986 | 2989 | 465 | 3843 | 2747 | 379 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 30 | 3017 | 2978 | 524 | 3883 | 2318 | 857 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 31 | 3474 | 3486 | 619 | 4470 | 2787 | 914 |
For wells like this -- 3K/month after seven (7) years of production and a cumulative of over one-half million bbls of oil -- and then taken off-line -- one suspects some activity in the area --
The graphic:
From the graphic: two things to key in on.
First, #28590:
- 28590, 1,258, WPX. Victor Elk 32-29HB, Reunion Bay, t1/15; cum 313K 1/18; look at the jump in production 1/18; FracFocus does not show any re-frack but that could be due to the fact that paperwork not yet received; no sundry form to suggest any plan to re-frack (this well will be interesting to follow -- to see if re-fracked or not); it was recently off-line for all of 22 days; look at recent production:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 27 | 16599 | 16784 | 7564 | 18375 | 12960 | 3396 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 12 | 1399 | 1353 | 1112 | 1509 | 801 | 406 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 4854 | 4949 | 2194 | 5373 | 3135 | 1334 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 22 | 3509 | 3274 | 1701 | 3884 | 1926 | 1241 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 30 | 4655 | 4814 | 2603 | 5153 | 1527 | 2741 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 31 | 4857 | 4719 | 2905 | 5377 | 3705 | 754 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 31 | 4983 | 5122 | 2734 | 5516 | 3761 | 824 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 30 | 4362 | 4313 | 2576 | 4830 | 2125 | 1854 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 18 | 2958 | 3028 | 2154 | 3275 | 1757 | 877 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 30 | 4761 | 4705 | 3333 | 5271 | 2910 | 1492 |
BAKKEN | 3-2017 | 31 | 4798 | 5032 | 3684 | 5311 | 3590 | 810 |
BAKKEN | 2-2017 | 28 | 5992 | 5927 | 5498 | 6632 | 5245 | 386 |
The second thing to key in on: the three wells on confidential status -- #32671, #32672, #32673. All three have been fracked based on production data on the confidential scout tickets:
- 32671, 10K produced after well completed; number of days of production not known;
- 32672, 18K produced after well completed; number of days of production not known;
- 32673, 19K produced after well completed; number of days of production not known;
Now, let's see if FracFocus has anything: yes, they have all been fracked, see dates of frack below --
- 33-025-03139, 12/172017/ - 1/4/2018;
- 33-025-03140, 12/162017/ - 1/4/2018;
- 33-025-03141, 12/172017/ - 1/4/2018;
33-025-03140:
- 5,418,936 gallons of water
- 45,221,021 pounds of water
- water was 87.43% by mass
- 87.43% of ? = 45.221 million lbs
- 51,722,545 total pounds
- sand: 11.75%
- 11.75% of 51,722,545 total pounds = 6077399 lbs of sand
- my estimates seem to come in low, so my hunch is that about 8 million lbs of sand used in the frack; a relatively small frack by today's standards; or maybe "moderate" would be better adjective. Whatever.
- yes, indeed, there has been recent activity in this area that is not shown by the NDIC map
- three wells have been completed and will report out in the near future (that data is available over at the NDIC but it's irrelevant to me, so I won't look it up)
- we observed a neighboring well that was taken off-line for 18 days and when it came back on-line production jumped from 4,000 bbls / month to 18,000 bbls / month
- generally a well is taken off-line for a longer period of time if it is going to be re-fracked, suggesting this well was not re-fracked; on the other hand, the jump in production was so great, it's hard to believe it was not re-fracked -- perhaps a mini-re-frack? but I would expect FracFocus to have that data -- it does not
- the amount of water used was incredibly low -- only 5.5 million gallons of water; a typical EOG well in a different field would have used 10 million gallons
- the amount of sand on a percentage basis was higher than what I normally see; I normally see about 8% sand by mass; this frack used almost 12% by mass
- FracFocus does not identify the size of the sand used; we will have to wait for the operator's report
Also noted: #29737 was taken off line for 20 days in December, 2017, and 17 days in January, 2018. It will be another month before we see if that well was affected. #29737 is 211 feet east of #19246.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.