Saturday, March 30, 2013

Random Look At Case 20107 in The April Dockets

Case 20107: EOG, Clarks Creek-Bakken, 11 wells on an existing 1920-acre unit; 11 wells on an existing 1280-acre unit; 22 wells on an existing 2560-acre unit; McKenzie; 44 wells total.

********************

Now, about that 2560-acre spacing unit -- sections 6, 7, 18, and 19 - 151-94. There are already fourteen wells in that area: some are in 2560-acre spacing already; others are still ICO.

The following wells are already in this 2560-acre spacing unit: 20886, 20887, 20888; 20890, 20891, 20892; one mile to the west, still in Clarks Creek, and ICO spacing: 22962, 22963, 20330, 20331, 20329, 20332, 20333, 20334. Based on existing surrounding spacing units, it appears these will be 2560-acre spaced wells, also.

I might have this wrong; folks who have minerals in this area would correct me if a) I was wrong; and, b) anonymous commenting was permitted. And due to time constraints and fact I don't have minerals in the area (in fact, I have no minerals anywhere), I may not pursue this to any degree.

There are 6 wells in the 2560-acre spacing unit that EOG is planning on a putting 22 wells; in other words, another 16 wells in this 2560-acre spacing unit. 

Note that these wells were on-line less than the full 31 days in January, 2013. One was on-line for only four days. All wells are flaring some gas, but all are hooked up to a natural gas line. This suggests there are takeaway constraints, and the wells are being choked back. In addition, there were weather-related production issues in January, 2013, in North Dakota. The bottom line is that these wells are capable of producing more than what we see here.
  • 20886, 317, EOG, Clarks Creek 101-1819H, t4/12; cum 290K 10/15; 4-section spacing; only 26 days in January, 2013;
  • 20887, 1,455, EOG, Clarks Creek 13-1806H, t3/12; cum 229K 10/15; 4-section spacing; only 21 days in January, 2013;
  • 20888, 3,415, EOG, Clarks Creek 14-1819H, t4/12; cum 224K 10/15; 4-section spacing; only 19 days in January, 2013
  • 20890, 600, EOG, Clarks Creek 11-0706H, t3/12; cum 283K 10/15; 4-section spacing; only 4 days in January, 2013;
  • 20891, 603, EOG, Clarks Creek 12-0719H, t8/11; cum 238K 10/15; 4-section spacing; only 18 days in January, 2013;
  • 20892, 1,352, EOG, Clarks Creek 16-0706H, t3/12; cum 248K 10/15; 4-section spacing; only 18 days in January, 2013;

  • 20329, 1,203, EOG, West Clark 4-2425H, t5/13; cum 260K 10/15;
  • 20330, 142, EOG, West Clark 3-2413H, t6/13; cum 229K 10/15;
  • 20331, 1,251, EOG, West Clark 101-2425H; t4/13; cum 220K 10/15;
  • 20332, 647, EOG, West Clark 100-2413H, t9/12; cum 197K 10/15; ICO spacing (probably 2560); only 23 days in January, 2013;
  • 20333, 449, EOG, West Clark 2-2425H, t9/12; cum 206K 10/15; ICO spacing (probably 2560); only 23 days in January, 2013;
  • 20334, 1,324, EOG, West Clark 1-2413H, t10/12; cum 188K 10/15; ICO spacing (probably 2560); only 23 days in January, 2013;
  • 22962, 1,093, EOG, West Clark 5-2425H, t12/12; cum 277K 10/15; ICO spacing (probably 2560); only 23 days in January, 2013;
  • 22963, 1,908, EOG, West Clark 102-2413H, t10/12; cum 161K 10/15; ICO spacing (probably 2560); 23 days in January, 2013;