At this post, I posted the production data for #19424 -- but looking at it now, not quite sure why I posted it. Whatever.
With updated production, it's time to look at it again.
There is no evidence that any of the wells below have been re-fracked. FracFocus has no data for a re-fracks; and, there are no sundry forms suggesting the three older wells were recently re-fracked. But the production has jumped so much it's hard to believe these wells have not been re-fracked.
In addition, note the distance between the wells. Pay attention to which wells are middle Bakken (MB) and which are Three Forks (TF).
The graphics:
The first well of interest:
- 19424, 662, CLR, Bud 1-19H, Crazy Man Creek, API - 33-105-01935, t3/11; cum 381K 1/18;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 26 | 7791 | 7921 | 8696 | 13167 | 1576 | 11591 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 28 | 13162 | 13262 | 14026 | 19878 | 6949 | 12929 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 17459 | 17509 | 16240 | 29268 | 10175 | 19093 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 30 | 23810 | 23414 | 23116 | 29675 | 14939 | 14736 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 16 | 4905 | 5179 | 10389 | 7477 | 495 | 6982 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 26 | 13529 | 13263 | 25500 | 18914 | 11027 | 7887 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2017 | 7 | 579 | 717 | 453 | 547 | 283 | 264 |
BAKKEN | 2-2017 | 17 | 2014 | 1870 | 1161 | 1970 | 1360 | 610 |
BAKKEN | 1-2017 | 4 | 11 | 293 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2016 | 26 | 2463 | 2507 | 1213 | 2843 | 2843 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2016 | 30 | 3237 | 3048 | 1950 | 4359 | 4359 | 0 |
Original production after initial completion:
BAKKEN | 11-2011 | 30 | 7802 | 8378 | 2582 | 10306 | 4688 | 5618 |
BAKKEN | 10-2011 | 31 | 9327 | 8601 | 2888 | 10992 | 8618 | 2374 |
BAKKEN | 9-2011 | 29 | 9352 | 9836 | 2980 | 11374 | 11374 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2011 | 31 | 11132 | 11157 | 3644 | 12967 | 11933 | 1034 |
BAKKEN | 7-2011 | 30 | 9319 | 9232 | 3363 | 10337 | 7506 | 2831 |
BAKKEN | 6-2011 | 26 | 11395 | 11175 | 3875 | 11787 | 423 | 11364 |
BAKKEN | 5-2011 | 23 | 5401 | 5340 | 1918 | 6036 | 0 | 6036 |
BAKKEN | 4-2011 | 30 | 7803 | 8127 | 3903 | 8760 | 0 | 8760 |
BAKKEN | 3-2011 | 22 | 12972 | 12270 | 2862 | 9756 | 0 | 9756 |
BAKKEN | 2-2011 | 7 | 235 | 235 | 0 | 233 | 0 | 233 |
Recent neighboring fracks:
- 30239, middle Bakken, fracked 3/25/17 - 4/7/17, frack data: 9,927,082 gallons, 88.97% water; 10.9% sand;
- 30240, Three Forks, 1st bench, fracked 3/26/17 and 7/4/17 - 7/12/17; frack data: 7,026,667 gallons, 88.7% water; 10.9% sand;
- note: 10 million gallons of water in one well, a big frack but not "out of bounds"; 7 million gallons of water in the other well, a moderate frack
- 28937, fracked once, back in 2014
- 28938, fracked once, back in 2014
#28937 TF (huge jump in production, but delayed a month or two compared to wells above):
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 31 | 8953 | 8985 | 8435 | 12179 | 538 | 11424 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 31 | 11082 | 10893 | 10436 | 17702 | 2583 | 14894 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 14764 | 15149 | 15184 | 22846 | 213 | 22393 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 24 | 9091 | 8760 | 11863 | 13688 | 26 | 13493 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 30 | 90 | 0 | 2600 | 214 | 0 | 5 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 31 | 135 | 0 | 5387 | 376 | 130 | 3 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 18 | 408 | 413 | 6540 | 436 | 295 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 27 | 4686 | 4993 | 8845 | 5793 | 5584 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 17 | 3369 | 2979 | 7762 | 3974 | 3838 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2017 | 23 | 3018 | 3275 | 2764 | 3800 | 2766 | 417 |
#28938 MB (minimal, if any, jump in production):
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 13 | 902 | 1084 | 1052 | 2520 | 0 | #30240) |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 31 | 4309 | 4527 | 3742 | 5930 | 2135 | |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 5767 | 5800 | 5407 | 7034 | 525 | 5747 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 31 | 6982 | 7106 | 7085 | 8305 | 110 | 7408 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 30 | 3377 | 3249 | 4602 | 4545 | 0 | 3784 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 31 | 5599 | 5633 | 6247 | 3269 | 0 | 2488 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 23 | 3277 | 3219 | 4490 | 2234 | 1314 | 316 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 30 | 5705 | 5572 | 5637 | 3930 | 2886 | 119 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 17 | 2957 | 2629 | 3272 | 1448 | 906 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2017 | 25 | 4746 | 4928 | 4713 | 6232 | 5123 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2017 | 28 | 5633 | 6070 | 4805 | 9932 | 9738 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2017 | 25 | 5697 | 5203 | 4672 | 3657 | 3478 | 0 |
Bottom line:
- no evidence that three wells of interest were re-fracked, but production in one of them (#19424) is so high, it's hard to believe it was not re-fracked; a second well had a large jump but not as big; the third well had minimal (if any) jump in production
- the oldest well was 633 feet away from the new (2017) fracks
- #28937 - a Three Forks well -- had a huge jump in production; it was about 1,320 feet from a middle Bakken well and about 1,380 feet from another Three Forks well (#30240)
- 1,320 feet / 1,380 feet is about twice what I normally seen between older fracked wells and newer fracked wells with bump in production after newer wells fracked
Note: if what I have posted is correct, and if what I see is correct, this has huge implications for the Bakken and the Three Forks.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.