- 16965, 1,109, EOG, Hauge 1-01H, Parshall, t6/09; cum 383K 8/12;
The information is available at the NDIC website, but this level of information requires a yearly subscription ($50) which is totally worth it.
This is monthly data: the fourth column is oil production (bbls); the fifth column is oil sold (bbls); the sixth column is water (bbls); the last three columns have to do with natural gas -- mcf produced, mcf sold, mcf flared.
Notice how very little water this well is producing (good).
Notice how the production has stabilized at about 5,000 bbls/month; this well is paid for, by the way (very good).
Notice how there has been minimal flaring after the first year (good).
This is monthly data: the fourth column is oil production (bbls); the fifth column is oil sold (bbls); the sixth column is water (bbls); the last three columns have to do with natural gas -- mcf produced, mcf sold, mcf flared.
Notice how very little water this well is producing (good).
Notice how the production has stabilized at about 5,000 bbls/month; this well is paid for, by the way (very good).
Notice how there has been minimal flaring after the first year (good).
BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 31 | 5318 | 5508 | 54 | 3355 | 3200 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2012 | 31 | 5455 | 5255 | 52 | 3304 | 2871 | 279 |
BAKKEN | 6-2012 | 30 | 5391 | 5398 | 47 | 3175 | 2993 | 33 |
BAKKEN | 5-2012 | 31 | 5686 | 5693 | 59 | 3494 | 3339 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2012 | 30 | 5664 | 5677 | 50 | 3547 | 3397 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2012 | 31 | 6023 | 6020 | 56 | 3326 | 3171 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2012 | 29 | 5681 | 5887 | 168 | 2993 | 2848 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2012 | 31 | 6294 | 6091 | 58 | 3413 | 3258 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2011 | 31 | 6438 | 6431 | 76 | 3555 | 3400 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2011 | 30 | 6287 | 6277 | 78 | 3635 | 3485 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2011 | 31 | 6858 | 6868 | 56 | 3983 | 3448 | 380 |
BAKKEN | 9-2011 | 30 | 6786 | 6773 | 56 | 3867 | 2143 | 1574 |
BAKKEN | 8-2011 | 31 | 7346 | 7359 | 70 | 4197 | 1917 | 2125 |
BAKKEN | 7-2011 | 31 | 7479 | 7492 | 77 | 4136 | 3965 | 16 |
BAKKEN | 6-2011 | 30 | 7606 | 7593 | 80 | 3998 | 3656 | 198 |
BAKKEN | 5-2011 | 31 | 7923 | 7913 | 173 | 4068 | 3759 | 162 |
BAKKEN | 4-2011 | 30 | 7694 | 7819 | 73 | 4024 | 3717 | 162 |
BAKKEN | 3-2011 | 31 | 8955 | 9030 | 99 | 4594 | 4439 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2011 | 28 | 7809 | 7712 | 82 | 3766 | 3626 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2011 | 31 | 9441 | 9421 | 100 | 4508 | 4354 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2010 | 31 | 10127 | 10054 | 118 | 4969 | 4814 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2010 | 30 | 10481 | 10571 | 150 | 5109 | 4959 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2010 | 31 | 11809 | 11836 | 239 | 5670 | 5476 | 39 |
BAKKEN | 9-2010 | 29 | 11529 | 11359 | 368 | 5053 | 4809 | 108 |
BAKKEN | 8-2010 | 30 | 8877 | 8887 | 249 | 4344 | 3860 | 338 |
BAKKEN | 7-2010 | 10 | 2785 | 2927 | 293 | 1369 | 0 | 1325 |
BAKKEN | 6-2010 | 25 | 10194 | 10495 | 141 | 4910 | 4640 | 145 |
BAKKEN | 5-2010 | 31 | 13780 | 13380 | 193 | 6629 | 5490 | 984 |
BAKKEN | 4-2010 | 30 | 15138 | 15125 | 210 | 6866 | 6622 | 94 |
BAKKEN | 3-2010 | 31 | 18218 | 18258 | 398 | 8442 | 8063 | 225 |
BAKKEN | 2-2010 | 28 | 17102 | 17128 | 324 | 7537 | 7143 | 254 |
BAKKEN | 1-2010 | 29 | 12612 | 12512 | 410 | 5965 | 5592 | 230 |
BAKKEN | 12-2009 | 23 | 10031 | 10151 | 842 | 4545 | 4184 | 256 |
BAKKEN | 11-2009 | 30 | 12550 | 12547 | 184 | 5750 | 5600 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2009 | 31 | 15226 | 15159 | 250 | 6344 | 5959 | 230 |
BAKKEN | 9-2009 | 30 | 17336 | 17410 | 348 | 7104 | 6882 | 72 |
BAKKEN | 8-2009 | 31 | 19567 | 19741 | 476 | 6777 | 6372 | 250 |
BAKKEN | 7-2009 | 29 | 20786 | 21207 | 1059 | 6952 | 5591 | 1216 |
BAKKEN | 6-2009 | 8 | 8395 | 7486 | 3352 | 3601 | 2844 | 718 |
Wow.
ReplyDeleteI pulled the data into a spreadsheet and did a little number crunching. Ignoring the gas, and assuming $90 price for all months (you can back that out and add in whatever average assumption you want), here's the gross revenue:
first 3 months - 48,748 bbls @ $90 = $4,387,320
next 12 monhts - 153,849 bbls @ $90 = $13,846,410
next 12 months - 108,199 bbls @ $90 = 9,737,910
latest 12 monhts - 71,881 bbls @ $90 = $6,469,290
total income @ $90 = $34.44M
That is a sharp dropoff, but in the last 12 months the drop is about 5 bopd.
Wow.
Gross revenue at least 3 times cost of drilling? Yeah, it's long since paid for itself.
That's why I love blogging. And I really the great links I get from all sources. The Bakken Shale Discussion Group is particularly good for interesting stories.
DeleteOnce a well is hooked up to pipelines, there is very little cost in maintaining that well. This well is good, but it's probably not atypical for Bakken wells; and some are much better.
That's why I can hardly wait each day to see results of the new wells.
Thank you for taking time to write.