To the best of my knowledge these have not been posted previously. I was updating the IPs of wells that were last reported to be on "DRL" status, and these popped up.
- 21885, 0, Chesapeake, Grenz 26-138-98 A 1H, Bakken/Three Forks, the well produced 77 bbls of oil in 25 days of production in September, 2012;
- 22223, 0, CHK, Hutzenbiler 9-137-99 A, a Madison well; t6/12; cum 419 bbls 9/12; the well was on-lie for 6 days in September; there was no production during those six days.
The Grenz well had some production, not a dry hole:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
BAKKEN/THREE FORKS | 9-2012 | 25 | 77 | 0 | 18791 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN/THREE FORKS | 8-2012 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 8110 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The Hutzenbiler well had some production, not a dry hole:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
MADISON | 9-2012 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MADISON | 8-2012 | 7 | 177 | 395 | 30735 | 252 | 0 | 252 |
MADISON | 7-2012 | 19 | 164 | 0 | 22974 | 887 | 0 | 887 |
MADISON | 6-2012 | 15 | 78 | 0 | 8407 | 264 | 0 | 264 |
In a recent presentation for CHK they do not mention the Bakken. http://www.chk.com/Investors/Documents/Latest_IR_Presentation.pdf
ReplyDeleteI posted the link at a stand-alone post, to make it easier to access. Thank you for taking the time to comment.
Delete