Wednesday, May 15, 2019

An Unexplained Jump In Production Of A Whiting Flatland Federal Well -- May 15, 2019

Note: always be careful with any of my postings. I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken. I sometimes see things that don't exist in the Bakken. This is another example. There's always possible there's a typographical error at the source, or an explanation that I have  not found, but here's another example of a jump in production with no obvious explanation. The mom-and-pop mineral owners probably don't really care -- they just appreciate their royalty checks.  The jump in production (see below) was not a full 30-days.

See this Flatland Federal posting for background. FracFocus is "down" right now so I cannot check recent frack data, but there is no sundry form suggesting a recent frack at this well.

The well:
  • 27522, 4,207, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4TFHU, t101/14; cum 498K 3/19;
Recent production:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN3-20192513063130379185418621926222555
BAKKEN2-2019289616353471460668766
BAKKEN1-201991601031362622480
BAKKEN12-20182929262926391863385780
BAKKEN11-20183030863133375901570161939
BAKKEN10-2018313189314630894598486911
BAKKEN9-2018303109331945396269375191

Neither of the other two wells (#27521, #27520) on that three well pad show any jump in production. 

Three older wells to the west show no jump in production either (#20589, #22360, #22361).

Five "30XXX" wells on a single pad in that immediate area:
  • 30688, 1,391, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4-2TFH, t10/15; cum 297K 3/19; GL;
  • 30687, 1,841, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4-2H, t10/15; cum 214K 3/19; AL;
  • 30776, 1,345, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4-3TFH, t10/15; cum 353K 3/19; F;
  • 30775, AB/175, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4-4TFH, t10/15; cum 337 bbls (no typo) 10/15;
  • 30774, 1,844, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4-5TFH, t10/15; cum 661K 3/19; F;

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.