Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Six New Permits -- April 9, 2025

Locator: 48450B.

Saudi Arabia: Saudi produces about 12 million bopd. Now being reported that new Saudi discoveries could add over 8,000 bbls of oil per day to Saudi's fossil fuel expansion efforts and add over 80 million cubic feet of gas per day. Link here

From the article:

The discoveries were made primarily in the Eastern Region and the vast Empty Quarter, with a mix of oil and gas reservoirs identified, and while moderate in volume compared to the Kingdom’s vast reserves, analysts are heralding this as a signal that expansion is real and moving forward.

**************************
Back to the Bakken

WTI: $63.13.

Active rigs: 33.

Six new permits, #41787 - #41792, inclusive:

  • Operator: XTO
  • Field: Grinnell (Williams County)
  • Comments:
    • XTO has permits for six GBU Apollo Federal wells, SWSW 12-154-96, t
      • o be sited 360 /510 FSL and 935 FWL.

One well permitted for recompletion, this well was 40+ years when it last produced; is on AB status and now going to be re-completed as a vertical; prior to going AB it had produced a total of 664K crude oil: monster wells are tracked here.

  • 8337, 265/AB, Cobra Oil and Gas, Harris-Federal 1-30, Wannagan oil field, about 15.3 miles southeast of Dickinson and the only active well in the area, Red River formation, t6/81; cum 664K 1/22;, NESE 30-141-102, Billings County; currently AB; vertical oil and gas; permit:

This Was Not A Black Swan Event — April 9, 2025

Locator: 48449INVESTING.

Black Swan.

We’ll get back to this later.

What we’ve seen in the past week is not a “black swan” event. It felt like one and had many of the earmarks of a “black swan” event but it was not.

It will be interesting to read what financial advisors will call it. So far, I’ve seen no label. I have at least one name for it. 

It’s more akin to March, 2020, and it is interesting that in both cases it occurred under the same president — five years apart. Neither were “black swan” events. Again, Cline has it right. Having said that, there are stark differences between March, 2020, and April, 2025.

I was reminded of “black swan” events when reading Eric H. Cline today, page 171. 

The one word that keeps cropping up in the conclusion: trading. I think there’s more than a few pundits who need to read this book.

Never stop reading.

Chevron -- Triple-Fracks In The Permian -- Triple-Fracking: 50% More Electricity Per Day -- April 9, 2025

Locator: 48448FRACK.

By the way, look at the way the source spells "fracking."

There are several components to this story:

  • technique,
  • cost,
  • speed,
  • resources
  • sand,
  • water,
  • electricity

The one that caught my attention: electricity.

Not mentioned: impact on takeaway capacity.

From World Energy News, April 9, 2025, link here:

Chevron started using triple-frac in the Permian for the first time last March. Jeff Newhook said in an interview that the company will use triple-frac on 50-60% of its wells this year. This is up from 20 percent last year.

Chevron has never reported the extent to which it plans to deploy this technique in new wells.

Newhook stated that by fracking three wells simultaneously, Chevron can complete each well in 25 percent less time and have them ready for production in 12 percent less cost per well.

He said, "What we really get out of it is a more effective use of capital as well as a higher return on investment."

Oil producers are increasingly interested in fracking multiple wells simultaneously. However, fracking more than two at a go is still a niche technique, according to Thomas Parambil Jacob. Senior vice president of Rystad energy.

Hugh Daigle is an associate professor at the University of Texas at Austin’s Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering. He said that companies who can finish wells faster have an edge over their competitors. Over the years, shale producers have innovated by learning how to bend drill bit horizontally and to drill further distances. Recently, artificial intelligence has been added to drill data processing in real-time for better results.

Newhook explained that triple-fracking uses the same amount of water and sand as fracking a single well, but it does so more quickly. This means Chevron requires 60% more water per day and sand when using this technique.

This creates a challenge in terms of logistics, as more than 10 trucks arrive per hour to bring sand to a well pad.

Newhook stated that the company had also started fracking in Colorado's Denver-Julesberg Basin, a second shale formation.

He added that Chevron's triple-fracking equipment is mainly electric, which uses 50% more energy per day than just fracking a single well.

Daigle added that triple-frac also requires greater capital expenditure upfront in order to drill enough wells in advance.

The Book Page -- Systems Collapse And Complexity -- April 9, 2025

Locator: 48447COLLAPSE.

Triple fracking: Chevon, Permian, link here. Reuters here, paywall. Will use a technique to fracture rock in three wells at a time. Morningstar here. It looks like this may be the full Reuters story without the paywall.

Wind, US, link here: even without Congress codifying this, this seems pretty much like the end of the road for wind energy in the US. It was dying before Trump was re-elected according to this story and now Trump's policies will likely be the final nail in the coffin. Not that we won't see more wind energy development and more wind energy stories, they will simply be more and more irrelevant. Notice that Charles Kennedy did not write this story.

************************
The Book Page

These are the four books I am reading, and re-reading. I've pretty much completed all four books but will probably "study" them for the next four to six weeks. 

I started these books about four weeks ago: I had just completed my most recent "Shakespearean phase" and was back into studying the history of the Bible, stimulated by an urge to re-read Edmund Wilson's The Scrolls From The Dead Sea. One review of Edmund Wilson's writing. The Masoretic Text.

1177 BC: The Year Civilization Collapsed, Eric H. Cline, c. 2021. Notes here. It's funny how things turn out. I bought this book, sight unseen. Bought it simply based on citations and subject matter in conjunction with what I was already reading. Turned out to be one of the best non-fiction books I've ever read. Highly, highly recommended.
 
From chapter six,"Sea Peoples, Systems Collapse, and Complexity Theory," which I think would have been better simply titled, "Systems Collapse and Complexity Theory," or to bring it up to date, "The Trump Economy, Systems Collapse, and Complexity Theory," LOL.
 
From page 169 of chapter, 
It would not have taken long for the globalized, interconnected world of the Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean and Aegean to grind to a halt, with economies disrupted and cities destroyed [Ukraine, Gaza]. Misery and migrations followed. Undoubtedly many were bewildered by the speed with which this happened, and some surely sought to explain the rapidity of decline by invoking angry gods [Trump, Musk].

At this point, we should recall the definition of collapse provided by Joseph Tainter (1988) which was cited at the beginning of this book: "Collapse is fundamentally a sudden, pronounced loss of an established level of sociopolitical complexity." 

However, I have also mentioned "transition" several times in the pages above, because collapse and transition can be two sides of the same coin. This is exactly what occurred at the end of the Late Bronze Age.

"Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it," paraphrased by George Santayana. 

WTI Holds At $57 -- Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Locator: 48447B.

WTI: $57.15.

New wells:

Thursday, April 10, 2025: 37 for the month, 37 for the quarter, 244 for the year,

  • 40761, conf, Hunt Oil, Kandiyohi 159-90-6-18H-3,
  • 40698, conf, Hess, EN-Kiesel-153-94-918H-8,
Wednesday, April 9, 2025: 35 for the month, 35 for the quarter, 242 for the year,
  • 40902, conf, CLR, Entzel 3-14H,
  • 40153, conf, Hess, EN-Eneebreton-157-94-1003H-3,
  • 40152, conf, Hess, EN-Engebretson-157-94-1003H-2,
  • 39039, conf, Grayson Mill, Orville 4-9 3H,

RBN Energy: US-China trade war has potential to devastate propane, ethane markets. Archived.

China was slated to enact a 34% reciprocal tariff on all imports of U.S. goods on April 10, now that has escalated to 84%. Unlike its February retaliatory tariffs of 10%-15% on U.S. oil and LNG, this time NGLs and all energy products are included — with propane and ethane squarely in the crosshairs. The Trump administration added another 50% to its tariffs on China, and China has maintained that it will fight to the end. China's latest retaliation of 84% tariff on Chinese imports of U.S. goods has the potential to destroy the propane and ethane markets. In today’s RBN blog, we look at the potential impact of China’s reciprocal tariffs. 

Like all of President Trump’s tariff wars, this front has been subject to rapid escalation. On February 1, he signed Executive Order 14195, imposing a 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, which took effect on February 4. That same day, China imposed a wide range of retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., including a 15% tariff on LNG and a 10% tariff on oil. At that point, there was no action on other energy products, so propane and ethane, along with other NGLs, were effectively exempt. But that was not the end of it. On March 4, the president increased the tariffs by another 10%. In retaliation, China announced a 15% tariff on U.S. goods. Then, as part of the “Liberation Day” proclamations of April 2, the U.S. tariff on Chinese goods was increased by another 34%, making the total tariff rate 54%. China followed with a retaliatory 34% tariff on all goods imported from the U.S., including oil, LNG, and all energy products.

The situation escalated on April 8, when President Trump formalized a further increase of 50% on imports of Chinese goods to the U.S., to go into effect April 9 if China did not rescind its most recent increase, pushing the total tariff rate to 104%. China has vowed not to back down. No additional tariffs had been announced at the time of posting the first version of this blog, but this morning (Wednesday) China raised its tariffs on U.S. goods to 84%, matching President Trump. 

China imports very little crude oil from the U.S., and those volumes can easily be rerouted so that other countries replace U.S. barrels. China does not import much LNG or other energy products from the U.S. However, liquified petroleum gas, or LPG (propane and butane), plays a much larger role, ranking as the second-highest U.S. export to China by value.

As a result, the tariffs have the potential to be a major disruptive force in global NGL markets. The U.S. sends about 20% of its propane exports to China. Most of that is used in the production of propylene via propane dehydrogenation (PDH). A 34% tariff on U.S. propane would devastate PDH economics, likely forcing China to drastically cut imports of U.S. propane. That, in turn, would place serious downward pressure on U.S. propane prices. China would try to replace as much U.S. supply as possible, but doing so would require uneconomic cargo rerouting — only possible if U.S. propane prices drop significantly at the point of origin to remain competitive.

The outlook for ethane is even more dire — at least for China. Chinese petrochemical crackers that use ethane as a feedstock rely exclusively on U.S. volumes. If tariffs make U.S. ethane uneconomical, these facilities will face two choices: absorb the cost or shut down. If shutdowns occur, the U.S. won’t be able to export those ethane volumes and will have to reject the surplus molecules into the natural gas stream. Almost 50% of U.S. ethane exports go to China, all used in ethylene production. The U.S. is China’s only possible source of ethane imports as it is the only country exporting ethane in large carriers.

With that background out of the way, let’s look a little closer at the impacts on LPG and ethane.

LPG – Propane and Butane

China was the second-largest importer of U.S. propane in 2024 at 311 Mb/d (red bar in left graph in Figure 1 below). The amount of butane in 2024 was much smaller at 26 Mb/d, or 5% of total U.S. exports, making China the sixth-largest importer of U.S. butane (red bar in right graph). Total U.S. exports of LPG to China were 337 Mb/d.

U.S. Propane and Butane Exports by Destination

Figure 1. U.S. Propane and Butane Exports by Destination. Source: EIA 

Keystone Pipeline Shut Down — April 9, 2025

Locator: 48446KEYSTONE.

Update

Saturday, April 12, 2025: Keystone operator says pipeline will be open "at reduced rates" by Tuesday, April 15, 2025.

Original Post

Link here.

The Keystone Pipeline was shut down yesterday after it ruptured in North Dakota, halting the flow of millions of gallons of crude oil from Canada to the U.S. and raising concerns of potentially higher gasoline prices. 

South Bow, a liquid pipeline business that manages the pipeline, said it shut down the pipeline after control center leak detection systems detected a pressure drop in the system. The company estimated that 3,500 barrels of oil were released and said the spill was confined to an agricultural field in a rural area, about 60 miles (97 kilometers) southwest of Fargo. 

 “The affected segment has been isolated, and operations and containment resources have been mobilized to site,” the company said. “Our primary focus right now is the safety of onsite personnel and mitigating risk to the environment.”