Link here.
Wood Mac.
Monday, February 4, 2019
But Will It Offer Free Wi-Fi And All-Gender Bathrooms? February 4, 2019
****************************************
The Ad Page
Ranked #2 by some, I think this was the #1 Super Bowl LIII ad although the Harrison Ford / Alexa / dog food ad was certainly a close #2.
The Four Words Most Feared By A Democratic Governor: Dramatic Drop In Tax Revenue -- February 4, 2019
Updates
February 6, 2019: someone agrees with me. Stuart Varney on Fox Business -- the tax exodus has just begun; it will become a flood.
It’s official.
The governor of New York confirms it. The tax exodus has begun.
We've been expecting this.
In New York, a $2.3 billion shortfall in state revenues. Gov. Cuomo blames the new tax law. You can only deduct $10,000 worth of state and local taxes. In high-tax states, that’s a pittance.
Result: Even middle-class people end up paying more tax, and the one-percenters are getting socked. Some of them are moving, and taking their money with them.February 5, 2019: Governor Cuomo changed his story overnight. Am I missing something here? No one is talking about this: Governor Cuomo's earlier complaint was the the Federal "SALT" tax deduction caused the problem. Helloooo! The SALT tax deduction / law was changed in 2018. Folks have not yet filed their 2018 returns. Unless the NY state revenue number that Governor Cuomo is talking about is an estimate he misses the bigger story. I don't know if his 2018 deficit is an estimate or if based on actual figures. Let's assume his comments were based on actual figures If so, those revenue receipts were made in calendar year 2017, not 2018. Again, payments for CY2018 are still coming in. Of course, the excessively rich were paying quarterly estimates. But the bottom line is this: rich New Yorkers were moving out of state well before 2018 and the change in the Federal "SALT" deduction. This did not happen overnight. Rich New Yorkers started their migration some years ago, probably during the Obama administration when the expectation was that Hillary would be elected president. [The New Yorkers knew Hillary much better than the rest of the country.]
So, Cuomo realizes that it was NOT the Federal SALT tax that caused the CURRENT problem. That's why he is changing his story. He does not want to go down that road, now, to increase taxes on the rich because he knows wealthy New Yorkers were leaving even before the change in the Federal tax law.
That was the first of two knock-out punches. Here's the second one.
And on this one, Governor Cuomo is correct. The Federal tax law regarding SALT goes into effect this past year, 2018, and the state will start to see the effects of that law this year, in 2019.
Cuomo sees the past: wealthy New Yorkers leaving the state because NY taxes too high.
Cuomo sees the future: it will get worse. Wealthy New Yorkers now affected by
- high NY taxes
- a NY federal representative that wants to increase taxes on the rich [Rep Occasional-Cortex (D)]
- the state legislature will want to increase taxes on the wealthy before they will make spending cuts
- the Federal "SALT" law
Original Post
The Big Stories.
The Obama years.
The Doomsday Chronicles.
US States.
From Newsday:
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Monday announced a dramatic drop in state income tax revenue of $2.8 billion, which he says will prompt him to revise his 2019-20 budget and reconsider spending on schools, health care and repairs to roads and bridges.
Cuomo, a Democrat, blamed the shortfall on a federal tax plan backed by Republican President Donald Trump. Cuomo said the law's cap on deductions for state and local taxes at $10,000 was to blame and suggested it is, anecdotally, triggering high-earners to leave New York.
“At this point there is no doubt that the budget we put forward is not supported by the revenues,” Cuomo said at a State Capitol news conference. “It’s as serious as a heart attack.”
Cuomo said he’s not certain what areas might need to be cut, but said the biggest spending areas now are education, health care, infrastructure and another phase-in of a previously approved middle-class tax cut.North Dakota Legacy Fund: growing by at least $50 million / month.
Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo bans fracking in upstate New York.
This is not rocket science.
Who Saw This Coming? -- February 4, 2019
Another MRO Re-Frack -- February 4, 2019; A New MRO Well Producing At 104K Bbls/Month?
Record IPs are tracked at this post.
Another MRO re-frack:
And typical of MRO re-fracks, a very small amount of proppant was used: 3.2 million gallons of water; 77% water by mass --
The graphic:
The wells: pending
Another MRO re-frack:
- 19838, 1,069, MRO, Debbie Baklenko USA 12-26H, Antelope-Sanish, t6/11; cum 245K 12/18;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SANISH | 12-2018 | 14 | 13796 | 13728 | 16994 | 19780 | 0 | 18940 |
SANISH | 11-2018 | 3 | 115 | 0 | 154 | 451 | 0 | 445 |
SANISH | 10-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 9-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 8-2018 | 31 | 1378 | 1503 | 286 | 2623 | 0 | 2152 |
SANISH | 7-2018 | 31 | 1595 | 1455 | 358 | 3171 | 7 | 2540 |
SANISH | 6-2018 | 29 | 1789 | 1754 | 357 | 3326 | 41 | 2696 |
SANISH | 5-2018 | 16 | 649 | 676 | 153 | 1311 | 0 | 1013 |
SANISH | 4-2018 | 19 | 728 | 742 | 118 | 1515 | 4 | 1 |
And typical of MRO re-fracks, a very small amount of proppant was used: 3.2 million gallons of water; 77% water by mass --
The graphic:
The wells: pending
- 33636, 4,405, MRO, Irish USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t1/19; cum --
- 33637 4,181, MRO, Snowman USA 41-25H, Antelope-Sanish, t1/19; cum 27K over 8 days, extrapolates to 103,691 bbls/month;
- 33638, 4,402, MRO, Four Dances USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum 34K over 14 days, extraplates to 72,707 bbls/month
Labels:
MRO_Refracking,
Re-Fracking,
RecordIP,
Staggering
Eleven New Permits -- February 4, 2019
Active rigs: pending
Eleven new permits:
$54.56 | 2/4/2019 | 02/04/2018 | 02/04/2017 | 02/04/2016 | 02/04/2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active Rigs | 63 | 58 | 40 | 44 | 140 |
Eleven new permits:
- Operators: Rimrock Oil & Gas (8); Equinor (3)
- Fields: South Fork (Dunn); Last Chance (Williams)
- Comments: Rimrock has permits for an 8-well pad in 10-148-93; Equinor has permits for a 3-well Marcia pad in 3-153-100 (see this post for a graphic of the area)
- Equinor: a Jarold permit in Williams County.
- 31801, 1,703, CLR, Jensen 5-8H1, Chimney Butte, t12/18; cum 47K over 20 days;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 20 | 45940 | 45625 | 51842 | 41275 | 27788 | 13487 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 5 | 1187 | 1187 | 3748 | 803 | 0 | 803 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 1 | 181 | 181 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 1 | 83 | 83 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 33638, 4,402, MRO, Four Dances USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum 35K 12/18; (see this post)
- 33636, 4.405, MRO, Irish USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum --; (see this post)
- 33637, 4,181, MRO, Snowman USA 41-25H, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum 28K 12/18; (see this post)
- 32532, 586, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-4B-9-5H, Charlson, t1/19; cum 3K over 6 days;
- 32530, 308, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-4A-9-7H, Charlson, t1/19; cum 3K over 2 days;
Global Warming Hits SoCal: Gas Company Asks Customers To Curb Use Of Natural Gas -- Apparenlty Wind, Solar Not Dispatchable -- February 4, 2019
Another self-inflicted wound on the Southern Californians.
Link to SeekingAlpha.
Link to SeekingAlpha.
- Overnight temperatures in Los Angeles are expected to drop as low as 39 degrees F during Monday-Wednesday, ~10 degrees below normal at this time of year, before rising to near normal levels later in the week.
- Gas supplies have been tight in Southern California this winter because of limitations on several SoCalGas pipelines and reduced availability of the Aliso Canyon storage field following a massive leak three years ago.
Update On An Incredible Re-Fracked CLR Rattlesnake Point Well -- February 4, 2019
Note: this was done quickly. There will be factual and typographical errors. It has not been proofread. I was interrupted by family commitments.
I have purposely not been updating the CLR wells in Rattlesnake Point because:
I don't have time to write my own note, and I couldn't write it any better, so here is the note I received from the reader who alerted me to this well:
The CLR Mountain Gap wells are tracked here, but have not been updated recently.
Okay, so before you look at the production profile of this well, note a couple of things:
Remember, the reader who sent me this, asked me this question:
I have purposely not been updating the CLR wells in Rattlesnake Point because:
a) I have updated them often; and,But I have no choice but to post this one.
b) the folks on Wall Street will tell me I'm cherry-picking my wells to post.
I don't have time to write my own note, and I couldn't write it any better, so here is the note I received from the reader who alerted me to this well:
If you are impressed with the Bridger well what do you think about Mountain Gap 31-10H #17100?My notes follow:
Mountain Gap well is a Continental re-frac that runs parallel to and about a mile west of the Bridger well.
As memory serves the initial frac on both were similar and the initial production for the several years prior to the re-frac was similar. Based on permit numbers it looks like they were permitted about the same time.
The difference? Mountain Gap was re-fracked after CLR had some history from the re-frac of Bridger. So is the difference in results based on knowledge or geology?
The CLR Mountain Gap wells are tracked here, but have not been updated recently.
Okay, so before you look at the production profile of this well, note a couple of things:
- the lousy 24-hour IP of 240, following the original open hole frack back in 2008
- look at the production in 6/18 (June, 2018)
- this is a 50K-well: tagged
- compare that production with production one year earlier, 6/17 (June, 2017)
- from the well file:
- the plan was to extend the existing lateral by 677' to a TVD of 11,246' and a MD of 21,247'
- introduction: COP originally drilled the Mountain Gap 31-10H .... within the Rocket prospect...the well was drilled to completion from its start on April 4, 2008, and completed on May 3, 2008.
- CLR acquired the well from COP and, with changing laws, was able to secure permission to drill more lateral footage in order to increase productivity of the well.
- This report primarily concerns re-entry drilling information only, but an entirely different operator. Where available, salient points from the original drilling events have been included. [The geologist then goes into great detail about how much more they learned during the re-drill -- between the first well and the re-drill.] [It appears the geologist wanted to drill a bit longer but "due to hard-line TD restrictions, we were unable to proceed far enough to ....]
- background gases were generally between 2600 - 3200 units over the short course of the well, with a 10,000-unit peak circulated up as reaming began
- all three samples contained significant levels of frack sand (note how the geologist spells "frack"], though the TD sample indicated a sharp drop in the level of frack sand included. As this well was fracked in open-hole fashion by the initial operator, this is neither unexpected nor alarming
- [the geologist believed] that we finished at least nine feet under the Upper Bakken, with the bit likely finishing in the final peak above zone
- [by the way, some of the best writing by geologists I have seen in many, many reports that I have read -- two geologists signed off on this report, September 23, 2017]
- the original well was drilled back in 2008; that wellbore was 8,617' total lateral: 6,364' (74%) in the target zone; 2,253' (26%) was above the target zone
- open hole frack with 1 million lbs of sand;
- data for the re-frack was not at the NDIC file, but according to FracFocus: 10 million gallons of water; 85% water by mass; which is a typical frack completion in 2018
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 31 | 21408 | 22114 | 19145 | 30985 | 29649 | 939 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 26 | 19947 | 19791 | 18477 | 29165 | 28029 | 799 |
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 23 | 16490 | 16215 | 15655 | 21907 | 19175 | 2445 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 30 | 25164 | 25212 | 26236 | 31413 | 27881 | 3140 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 31 | 35997 | 35753 | 45374 | 42924 | 42309 | 210 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 31 | 41189 | 41427 | 57492 | 45918 | 43344 | 2169 |
BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 30 | 52661 | 52713 | 63442 | 57604 | 52886 | 4326 |
BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 17 | 26682 | 26410 | 36450 | 28245 | 21100 | 7145 |
BAKKEN | 4-2018 | 5 | 694 | 694 | 5436 | 1379 | 0 | 1379 |
BAKKEN | 3-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 22 | 171 | 240 | 33 | 88 | 88 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 31 | 296 | 239 | 37 | 122 | 116 | 6 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 30 | 267 | 231 | 57 | 137 | 122 | 15 |
Remember, the reader who sent me this, asked me this question:
So is the difference in results based on knowledge or geology?Here is my reply:
To answer your question, I think it's a bit of both.
I don't have the knowledge or resources to do a statistical review, but it's my impression that some fields (some locations) in the Bakken are much better for re-fracks. It may have to do with natural fracks or the geologists may have better knowledge of certain areas, for example, North Dakota's micro-seismic array may be better in some areas than others.In addition, there is no question that, geologists and roughnecks have learned a lot over the years. The geologists have learned a lot about the geology but the roughnecks need to keep the wellbore in the hole and now screw things up by dropping tools down the hole, etc. The roughnecks in the Bakken, I would bet, are among the best in the world. Scratch that. The best in the world.
Note: the first well, 76% of the time within the zone. I'm sure Harold Hamm's expectation is 95%+ time within the zone. I did not see that data for the second well; it's probably there if one has time to read the graphs.But this is an incredible well.
Oasis Crane Federal Wells Have Been Updated -- February 4, 2019
Something Going On With CLR's Phenomenal Hawkinson Wells In Oakdale Oil Field? One Hawkinson Well Coming Up On 2 Million BOE -- Drilled Eight Years Ago -- February 4, 2019
This page will not be updated.
The Oakdale oil field and Hawkinson permit are tracked here.
These are spectacular wells.
Many were taken off line as of 6/18; another group were taken off line as of 10/18; and, yet another group was taken off line as of 11/18.
Two new wells on DRL status are now on the 18858-18861 pad:
Meanwhile, the production profile for #20212 after the re-frack can be found here.
Back to #20210:
The Oakdale oil field and Hawkinson permit are tracked here.
These are spectacular wells.
Many were taken off line as of 6/18; another group were taken off line as of 10/18; and, yet another group was taken off line as of 11/18.
Two new wells on DRL status are now on the 18858-18861 pad:
- 35272,
- 35273,
- 20208, IA/960, CRL, Hawkinson 2-27H, Oakdale, Bakken; t9/11; cum 452K 12/18; off line as of 6/18;
- ******20210, 803, CLR, Whitman 2-34H, Oakdale, Bakken, t9/11; cum 1.629573 million bbls/112/18; FracFocus/NDIC: no record of refrack; huge jump 9/18;
- 20211, AB/263, CLR, Hawkinson 3-27H, Oakdale, Bakken; t9/11; cum 385K 10/17;
- **** 20212, 482, CLR, Whitman 3-34H, Oakdale, Bakken; t9/11; 308K 12/18; re-fracked 9/17;
Meanwhile, the production profile for #20212 after the re-frack can be found here.
Back to #20210:
- crude oil: 1,629,573 bbls
- natural gas: 1,688,509 MCF = 281,371 boe
- total: 1,910,944 boe; or 89,000 boe short of 2 million boe, drilled less than eight years ago; this well will continue to produce for 35 years
A Rose By Any Other Name Is Still A Rose -- Tunnel? This Is A Pipeline -- February 4, 2019
"Political correctness" ruined the Super Bowl LIII ads; now political correctness over in Norway.
Next to "ranking" Norwegian/Scandinavian names, this might be the best story of the day. Sent to me by a reader. I would have definitely missed it. I don't follow:
With that said, here's the link.
I'm waiting for Elon Musk to weigh in on this one.
As long as I've rambled this long, some personal notes: my grandfather came from Trondheim.
From another site:
"Paul" is/was my paternal grandfather. Born in Inderøy Municipality, he always called it "Trondheim." He homesteaded near Newell, SD, that "dry, flat, empty northwestern corn of South Dakota.
Quick! Without looking, who coined the term, "black hole"? I was sure I knew. I was wrong.
From Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick, c. 1992, page 94:
From wiki: Superman is a fictional superhero created by writer Jerry Siegel and artist Joe Shuster. He first appeared in Action Comics #1, a comic book published on April 18, 1938.
Next to "ranking" Norwegian/Scandinavian names, this might be the best story of the day. Sent to me by a reader. I would have definitely missed it. I don't follow:
- fjiord stories
- floating tunnel stories
- ABC News
With that said, here's the link.
Highway E39 in Norway is one of the most beautiful drives in the world, hugging the country's rugged west coast from Kristiansand to Trondheim.
It is 684 miles of unending scenery, including rivers and lakes, waterfalls and mountains and numerous fjords.
But if you look carefully at a road map, E39 is something of a dotted line. Each of the breaks occurs at seven fjords -- where drivers must put their cars on a ferry to get across.
This stop-and-start, sea-and-land journey takes 21 hours.
But the government of Norway has a plan.
"Ferry-free E39" would cut the driving time almost in half with a series of bridges and tunnels across the fjords.Video at the link.
I'm waiting for Elon Musk to weigh in on this one.
As long as I've rambled this long, some personal notes: my grandfather came from Trondheim.
From another site:
"Paul" is/was my paternal grandfather. Born in Inderøy Municipality, he always called it "Trondheim." He homesteaded near Newell, SD, that "dry, flat, empty northwestern corn of South Dakota.
***********************************
The Physics Page
Quick! Without looking, who coined the term, "black hole"? I was sure I knew. I was wrong.
From Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick, c. 1992, page 94:
Compared to the hydrogen atom, the stark kernel with which [Niels] Bohr had begun his quantum revolution, the uranium atom was a monster, the heaviest atom in nature, bulked out with 92 protons and 140-odd neutrons, so scarce in the cosmos that hydrogen atoms outnumber [uranium] by seventeen trillion to one, and unstable, given to decaying at quantum mechanically unpredictable moments down a chain of lighter elements or -- this was the extraordinary news that kept Bohr at his portable blackboard all though the North Atlantic voyage [from Copenhagen to Princeton] -- splitting, when slugged by a neutron, into odd pairs of smaller atoms, barium and krypton or tellurium and zirconium, plus a bonus of new neutrons and free energy.Krypton. Who knew?
From wiki: Superman is a fictional superhero created by writer Jerry Siegel and artist Joe Shuster. He first appeared in Action Comics #1, a comic book published on April 18, 1938.
Oasis To Report Huge Well In Early May -- February 4, 2019
The Aagvik Wells
Updates
- 34811, 685, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 15T, Banks, t11/18; cum 174K 3/20; cum 198K 8/21; cum 204K 6/22;
- 34239, 605, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 9B, 50 stages; 6 million lbs; Banks, t12/18; cum 233K 3/20; note
the small amount of proppant for a middle Bakken well; that's the
amount of proppant one would expect for a Three Forks well; cum 273K 8/21; cum 285K 6/22;
- 34238, 640, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 8T, Banks, t12/18; cum 156K 3/20; cum 178K 8/21; cum 185K 6/22;
- 34237, 576, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 7B, Banks, t12/18; cum 220K 3/20; cum 256K 8/21; cum 268K 6/22;
- 34156, 853, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 14-26 14TX, Banks, t3/19; cum 214K 3/20; cum 265K 6/22;
- 34155, 537, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 14-26 13BX, Banks, t2/19; cum 272K 3/20; cum 332K 6/22;
- 34090, 150, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 13-26 12T, Banks, t2/19; cum 209K 3/20; cum 265K 6/22;
- 34089, 532, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 13-26 11B, Banks, t1/19; cum 252K 3/20; cum 307K 6/22;
- 34088, 645, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 14-26 13XX, Banks, t2/19; cum 272K 3/20; cum 238K 6/22;
- 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 13-26 10T, Banks, t1/19; cum 196K 3/20; cum 362K 6/22;
- 34040, 613, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 6T, Banks, t1/18; cum 169K 3/20; cum 197K 6/22;
- 34039, 810, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 5B, Banks, t12/19; cum 226K 3/20; cum 268K 6/22;
- 34038, dry, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 4T, Banks, --
- 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 3BX, Banks, t11/18; cum 316K 3/20; cum 362K 6/22;
- 34036, 543, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 2TX, Banks, t11/18; cum 152K 3/20; cum 181K 6/22;
- 18249, 702, Oasis, Lundeen 4-26H, Banks, t6/10; cum 229K 3/20; cum 237K 6/22;
- 17986, 501, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 1-35H, Banks, t12/09; cum 237K 3/20; cum 243K 8/21; cum 248K 6/22;
Huge jump in production, #17986:
BAKKEN | 8-2019 | 31 | 1352 | 1196 | 2431 | 9833 | 9523 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2019 | 31 | 1255 | 1493 | 2550 | 10157 | 9847 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2019 | 30 | 1876 | 1711 | 2405 | 9810 | 9510 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2019 | 12 | 660 | 563 | 825 | 3419 | 3289 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2019 | 30 | 11474 | 11786 | 10406 | 45836 | 45536 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 31 | 14517 | 14326 | 11035 | 46044 | 45734 | 310 |
BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 28 | 13631 | 13616 | 10792 | 42137 | 35242 | 6615 |
BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 7 | 3680 | 3356 | 3350 | 9811 | 5931 | 3810 |
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 24 | 470 | 559 | 100 | 1028 | 756 | 32 |
Updates
May 16 2019: another big Aagvik well was reported today --
- 34239, 605, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 9B, 50 stages; 6 million lbs; Banks, t12/18; cum 233K 3/20; note the small amount of proppant for a middle Bakken well; that's the amount of proppant one would expect for a Three Forks well;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 31 | 23717 | 23977 | 14752 | 74977 | 71812 | 2948 |
BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 28 | 28254 | 28375 | 16724 | 88639 | 87805 | 638 |
BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 31 | 30514 | 30714 | 28399 | 90855 | 74704 | 15934 |
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 31 | 27474 | 27297 | 38832 | 64659 | 0 | 64659 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 16 | 9226 | 8756 | 27413 | 626 | 0 | 626 |
May 14, 2019: more Aagvik wells reporting -
- 34238, 640, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 8T, Banks, t12/18; cum 156K 3/20;
- 34237, 576, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 7B, Banks, t12/18; cum 220K 3/20;
March 9, 2019: see this post for update.
Original Post
I'm going to have to start a page ranking "best" Norwegian names. We might have to start with Aagvik but Kjorstad would be a close second. The best name, of course might be a surname with either of these letters:
- å
- ø
Huge thanks to the reader who alerted me to this well:
- 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 BX, Banks, t11/18; cum 316K 3/20;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 6-2019 | 22 | 9803 | 9649 | 13628 | 41640 | 37910 | 3501 |
BAKKEN | 5-2019 | 31 | 12577 | 12589 | 12694 | 47957 | 44983 | 2652 |
BAKKEN | 4-2019 | 30 | 23003 | 22997 | 22604 | 86149 | 83875 | 1962 |
BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 31 | 31769 | 32260 | 27378 | 86655 | 83927 | 2728 |
BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 28 | 43806 | 43880 | 26985 | 140691 | 137960 | 2440 |
BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 31 | 53601 | 53782 | 33616 | 158050 | 143823 | 13905 |
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 31 | 59173 | 59019 | 41729 | 147683 | 100860 | 46501 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 23 | 31025 | 30408 | 32607 | 105108 | 28130 | 76739 |
Note: this is a 50K_well (tagged). The reader also notes that this is "section line well" -- the reader suggests that Oasis often uses a bit more proppants on such wells.
According to the NDIC, this well will come off the confidential list on May 5, 2019.
The Banks oil field is tracked here.
The graphic:
Off-line: #17986. I'll bet a six-pack of tuna (for the Kat) and/or a six-pack of Coke (for Steve) and/or a new English dictionary (for one reader in New Mexico) that this well will show a huge bump in production once it comes off line. [It did.]
The wells in the graphic:
- 17986, 501, Oasis, Aagvik 1-35H, Banks, t12/09; cum 232K 10/19; came off line 7/18; back on line as of 1/19;
Pool Date Days BBLS Oil Runs BBLS Water MCF Prod MCF Sold Vent/Flare BAKKEN 6-2019 30 1876 1711 2405 9810 9510 0 BAKKEN 5-2019 12 660 563 825 3419 3289 0 BAKKEN 4-2019 30 11474 11786 10406 45836 45536 0 BAKKEN 3-2019 31 14517 14326 11035 46044 45734 310 BAKKEN 2-2019 28 13631 13616 10792 42137 35242 6615 BAKKEN 1-2019 7 3680 3356 3350 9811 5931 3810 BAKKEN 12-2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAKKEN 11-2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAKKEN 10-2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAKKEN 9-2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAKKEN 8-2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAKKEN 7-2018 24 470 559 100 1028 756 32 BAKKEN 6-2018 20 526 587 0 1274 1052 22 BAKKEN 5-2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAKKEN 4-2018 15 354 291 190 942 775 17 BAKKEN 3-2018 31 816 869 180 2176 1842 24 - 34038, dry, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 4T,
- 34811, 685, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 15T, t11/18; cum 158K 10/19;
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
12-2018 | 23155 | 44748 |
11-2018 | 13371 | 0 |
- 34036, 543, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 2TX, 50 stages, 4 million lbs; Banks, t11/18; cum 139K 10/19;
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
12-2018 | 20532 | 30468 |
11-2018 | 15511 | 8378 |
- 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35BX, t11/18; cum 296K 10/19;
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
12-2018 | 59019 | 100860 |
11-2018 | 30408 | 28130 |
- 34039, 810, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 5B, t12/18; cum 206K 10/19;
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
12-2018 | 26107 | 58419 |
11-2018 | 16355 | 11170 |
- 34040, 613, Oasis, Aagik 5298 41-35 6T, Banks, t11/18; cum 155K 10/19;
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
2-2019 | 22850 | 73685 |
1-2019 | 21534 | 62332 |
12-2018 | 20575 | 42041 |
11-2018 | 14015 | 6195 |
- 34039, see above, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 5B, Banks,
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
2-2019 | 25376 | 87240 |
1-2019 | 24978 | 79018 |
12-2018 | 26107 | 58419 |
11-2018 | 16355 | 11170 |
- 34037, see above, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 3BX, Banks,
Date | Oil Runs | MCF Sold |
---|---|---|
2-2019 | 43880 | 137960 |
1-2019 | 53782 | 143823 |
12-2018 | 59019 | 100860 |
11-2018 | 30408 | 28130 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)