Updates
February 21, 2022: production figures updated.
June 16, 2017: Zavanna with two new permits in Stockyard Creek --
- 33678, 1,025, Zavanna, Hanson 28-33 5H, Stockyard Creek, t1/18; cum 316K 10/20; cum 356K 8/21; cum 360K 10/21; off line 10/21; back on line, cum 374K 6/22; jump in production;
- 33679, 858, Zavanna, Hanson 28-33 4TFH, Stockyard Creek, t1/18 cum 291K 10/20; cum 328K 8/21; cum 338K 12/21; now off line; back on line; cum 348K 6/22;
June 5, 2016:
halo effect; some incredible notes from a reader.
August 24, 2015: Zavanna Angus wells ten miles east-southeast of Williston (note: CLR also has "Angus" wells in Elm Tree oil field) --
- 26687, 1,210, Zavanna, Angus 3-10 7H, Long Creek, middle Bakken, max gas was trip gas of 2,184 units; flares 2 - 6 feet, 19 drilling days, big rig 8 days, 81% within target interval, 24 stages, 2.8 million lbs, t4/15; cum 310K 10/20; cum 320K 8/21; cum 326K 12/21; cum 332K 6/22;
- 26686, 548, Zavanna, Angus 34-27 4TFH, Stockyard Creek, t9/15; cum 202K 1/20; cum 222K 8/21; cum 203K 12/21; cum 235K 6/22;
- 26685, 1,543, Zavanna, Angus 3-10 5H, middle Bakken, gas shows as high as 5,770 units, flares 2 - 6feet; big rig - 12 days, 67% within target interval, 35 stages, 3.9 million lbs, Long Creek, t3/15; cum 274K 1/20; cum 297K 8/21; cum 301K 12/21; cum 307K 6/22;
- 26684, 567, Zavanna, Angus 3-10 3TFH, Long Creek, t9/15; cum 294K 1/20; cum 318K 8/21; cum 326K 12/21; cum 330K 6/22;
- 26683, 2,950, Zavanna, Angus 34-27 2H, Stockyard Creek, t9/15; cum 441K 1/20; cum 481K 8/21; cum 489K 12/21; cum 498K 6/22;
- 26682, 2,770, Zavanna, Angus 3-10 1H, Long Creek, t9/15; cum 337K 1/20; cum 364K 8/21; 375K 12/21; cum 386K 6/22;
Update on the other wells noted in the original post:
- 20085, 825, Zavanna, Nelson 3-10 1H, Long Creek, 35 stages; 3.8 million lbs; t8/12; cum 471K 1/20; off-line many months; see much more about this well as this post; back on line, doing very well; cum 494K 8/21; 498K 12/21; cum 502K 6/22;
- 26676, 630, Zavanna, Nelson 3-10 3TFH, Long Creek, t2/15; cum 224K 1/20; off line 6/21; cum 245K 5/21; cum 252K 12/21; cum 262K 6/22;
- 26677, 695, Zavanna, Nelson 3-10 2TFH, Long Creek, total drilling days, 28; "the Three Forks is sourced by the Lower Bakken member"; benches mentioned; "the first bench of the Three Forks is the zone of interest for oil production"; gas shows as high as 6,500 units; difficult to stay in target; majority of the lateral was drilled just above the ideal target zone (2 - 3 feet in TVD); reported dated July 22, 2014; 100% within TF first bench; t2/15; cum 294K 1/20; off line 4/21; cum 312K 4/21; cum 323K 12/21; cum 332K 6/22;
Original Post
A Swedish/Danish family that retains a few mineral acres in the Bakken, alerted me to this note:
- Zavanna will add three (3) middle Bakken wells and three (3) TF wells to #20085 in Long Creek.
The reader suggests I look at the homepage:
http://zavanna.com/company.html; and,
http://zavanna.com/business-strategy.html.
Here's an update of the existing well:
- 20085, 825, Zavanna, Nelson 3-10 1H, 35 stages; 3.8 million lbs; t8/12; cum 170K 9/13;
Long Creek is located just to the west of Banks and Truax, a sweet spot in the Bakken. This particular well is located just south of Stockyard Creek, one of the most active and better fields in the Bakken.
For newbies, take a look at that well. It's a non-descript well, a well that would not have caught anyone's attention when the IP was reported (a mediocre
825) and here it is about a year later, and the well has produced close to 200 boe.
The natural gas processing plants in the area are simply inadequate to handle all the production.
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
BAKKEN | 9-2013 | 30 | 7504 | 7413 | 4808 | 11339 | 1635 | 9704 |
BAKKEN | 8-2013 | 30 | 8079 | 8081 | 4802 | 11578 | 4884 | 6694 |
BAKKEN | 7-2013 | 31 | 9228 | 8797 | 5752 | 13248 | 6868 | 6380 |
BAKKEN | 6-2013 | 30 | 8771 | 9025 | 5289 | 11416 | 2567 | 8849 |
BAKKEN | 5-2013 | 31 | 8065 | 7632 | 5370 | 9476 | 1393 | 8083 |
BAKKEN | 4-2013 | 17 | 2701 | 2568 | 1997 | 3835 | 2 | 3833 |
BAKKEN | 3-2013 | 23 | 9296 | 9113 | 4476 | 17683 | 3452 | 14231 |
BAKKEN | 2-2013 | 28 | 15086 | 15002 | 6633 | 25901 | 17363 | 8538 |
BAKKEN | 1-2013 | 31 | 19439 | 20094 | 8013 | 29596 | 15078 | 14518 |
BAKKEN | 12-2012 | 31 | 14300 | 13548 | 6533 | 18656 | 7861 | 10795 |
BAKKEN | 11-2012 | 30 | 13471 | 13463 | 6198 | 14874 | 5343 | 9531 |
BAKKEN | 10-2012 | 31 | 16017 | 16139 | 7662 | 17715 | 406 | 17309 |
BAKKEN | 9-2012 | 30 | 22106 | 22113 | 10812 | 29938 | 2058 | 27880 |
BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 12 | 15835 | 14642 | 22295 | 16927 | 0 | 16927 |
From the GIS map server, this is what the area looks like right now, in three screen shots:
First, the two new wells next to the existing well:
Second, six new wells to the west of the existing well noted above:
Finally, zooming out to provide a perspective of the entire area. In this screenshot, the six-well pad is not identifiable as a six-well pad; only #26687 shows up: