30-second sound bite: this well produced more oil in the past year than it did the entire preceding nine years and it was not re-fracked. It was simply taken off line for two months and then put back into production (wink, wink, or tongue-in-cheek).
Note: in a long note like this there will be typographical and factual errors. I may have made huge errors in simple arithmetic.
Note: I am using $30/bbl for price of crude oil in some examples; in others, $40 oil. I am making assumptions in some examples.
The definition of an ideal well: a well that pays for itself in six months and then provides free cash flow for the next 35 years.
The following well is NOT an ideal well. It took many years to pay for itself. But in the past year it appears to have generated millions of dollars in free cash flow.
This gets back to a discussion we had months ago. This was addressed by the CEO of some oil company operating in the Bakken some months ago when asked about the "return on investment." I don't remember his specific words, but they were something to the effect that in some cases the return on a well in the Bakken can only be defined as "infinite." Some readers took issue with that. That's fine.
Yes, I know how the return can be calculated, but this is the problem. How do you "carry this on your books" when considering return on investment?
The well:
- 17799, 457, BR, Guadalupe 11-23H, Charlson, t3/09; cum 542K 8/19; not re-fracked; for full production profile, see this post;
This well produced 230,608 bbls between 3/09 and 5/18 when it was taken off line for two months. By 5/18, production had leveled off at about 1,500 bbls/month. Forgetting about the natural gas, at $40/bbl crude oil this well had produced $9.25 million in revenue. Probably about what the well initially cost.
It was then taken off line for two months. It came back on line in July, 2018, about a year ago.
In the past year, this well produced 311,226 bbls. As far as I can tell it was not re-fracked.
At $40/bbl = $12.5 million this past year. For a well that had zeroed out. For a well that was taken off line. For a well that was no longer producing (wink, wink).
So many story lines. Back in 2009 this well might have been considered "uneconomic." But the operator keep it on line.
Now, let's say the original owner of these minerals never sold his 160 acres of minerals (the typical size of a farm in this area). This is a 640-acre-spaced well. The owner controlled/owned 25% of the production, and probably received 18% royalties for the production.
In
April, 2018, the mom-and-pop mineral owner would have received roughly:
- 1,157 bbls x 0.25 x 0.18 x x $30 = $1,500.
Not bad but not great. The mom-and-pop mineral owner probably thought this was pretty much what this well was going to be from here on out.
Then, in
August, 2018:
- 28,578 x 0.25 x 0.18 x $30 = $38,580.
That was a check for one month.
For the entire past year:
- 300,000 bbls x 0.25 x 0.18 x $30 = $400,000 in royalties this past year alone.
Oh, one more thing. The owner with mineral rights for this well now has another dozen or so wells. Those wells are spaced at 1280- and 2560-acres so the decimal will be less, but all the same.....
So many story lines.
Again, this well was not re-fracked according to the NDIC and according to FracFocus. I don't think it was re-fracked.
This well has not been refracked:
Recent production:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
BAKKEN | 8-2019 | 31 | 8220 | 8416 | 2909 | 35274 | 35169 | 28 |
BAKKEN | 7-2019 | 31 | 9802 | 9556 | 2530 | 30326 | 30058 | 191 |
BAKKEN | 6-2019 | 30 | 13347 | 13680 | 2269 | 33120 | 33046 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2019 | 23 | 14244 | 14229 | 1350 | 24852 | 24066 | 729 |
BAKKEN | 4-2019 | 30 | 22406 | 22430 | 1996 | 23490 | 22854 | 562 |
BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 31 | 29673 | 29576 | 2600 | 25049 | 24972 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 28 | 28054 | 28231 | 2077 | 27395 | 27325 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 31 | 29921 | 30008 | 2390 | 29361 | 29284 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 30 | 29567 | 29553 | 2462 | 27767 | 27693 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 30 | 28924 | 28924 | 2715 | 26246 | 26172 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 31 | 26945 | 26520 | 2271 | 27609 | 27532 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 30 | 25088 | 25570 | 2155 | 26978 | 26904 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 31 | 28814 | 28578 | 2947 | 32269 | 32192 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 31 | 16221 | 15949 | 2552 | 17136 | 17059 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2018 | 30 | 797 | 1173 | 73 | 1025 | 951 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2018 | 31 | 1376 | 1157 | 112 | 1981 | 1904 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2018 | 28 | 1290 | 1186 | 123 | 1742 | 1672 | 0 |
Initial production when this well was first drilled / completed back in 2009:
BAKKEN | 10-2009 | 31 | 4657 | 4443 | 279 | 6258 | 0 | 6258 |
BAKKEN | 9-2009 | 28 | 4289 | 4597 | 256 | 6494 | 4948 | 1546 |
BAKKEN | 8-2009 | 31 | 5468 | 5305 | 419 | 8661 | 7609 | 1052 |
BAKKEN | 7-2009 | 31 | 6383 | 6446 | 579 | 8164 | 5829 | 2335 |
BAKKEN | 6-2009 | 23 | 5908 | 6000 | 588 | 7737 | 5963 | 1774 |
BAKKEN | 5-2009 | 31 | 7296 | 7028 | 568 | 8979 | 8247 | 732 |
BAKKEN | 4-2009 | 30 | 8520 | 8716 | 871 | 9571 | 4969 | 4602 |
BAKKEN | 3-2009 | 29 | 9594 | 9177 | 1774 | 8376 | 0 | 8376 |