Updates
May 14, 2012: JP Morgan is "one of the best-managed banks." -- President Obama.
May 14, 2012: It appears that before this is all over,
Jamie Dimon may be in more trouble than it appears at the moment.
May 11, 2012: As the dust starts to settle, or the clouds start to clear, pick your metaphor, the JP Morgan story becomes clearer. This from the WSJ today, print edition, front page:
The bank, betting on a continued economic recovery with a complex web of trades tied to the values of corporate bonds, was hit hard when prices moved against it starting last month, causing losses in many of its derivatives positions. The losses occurred whle JP Morgan tried to scale back that trade.
The big story, for most of us, is not that JP Morgan bet wrong and lost $2 billion, and more to come. (In fact, as the dust settles, the $2 billion seems more than manageable: "... we still earned approximately $4 billion after-tax this quarter give or take," according to Mr Dimon. The bank earned $5.38 billion in the first quarter. --
WSJ.
The big story for most of us is how JP Morgan bet wrong. The company bet "on a continued economic recovery." Earlier this week the word "recession" started appearing more often in business circles.
Original Post
All day today on CBNC, one theme that was being repeated: individual investors should not do their own investing. The professionals feel the individual, retail investor is not smart enough to do his / her own investing.
One talking head said retail investors investing on their own is like removing one's own appendix. One wouldn't do that; likewise, one should not do one's own investing. By 4:30 p.m. it was pretty much a dead story. Or so I thought.
At 4:30, Jamie Dimon says there would be a conference call at 5:00 p.m. regarding JPM quarterly earnings.
It turns out JPM took a "whale" of a loss on derivatives trading. We are given the numerator ($2 billion, and possibly an additional $1 billion later) but no denominator. But apparently it's a huge, huge, huge hit.
See Wall Street Journal.
In that short article a trader's name is mentioned: Bruno Michel Iksil.
Now, google that name.
A blog.
Who knows where this will lead? But I keep thinking of the CNBC theme all day today: that the individual, retail investor is not smart enough to do his/her own investing, and that "we" need to trust our money with the professionals.
Just saying.
*******************
From another source:
There had been media reports that a single JPMorgan trader in Europe,
known in the bond market as "the London whale," was making massive bets
that were influencing prices in the $10-trillion market.
And some folks in Congress are concerned about speculators influencing the price of oil.