Locator: 48030ECON.
Tags: mortgage house prices
From today's Yahoo!Briefing:
Exactly what I wrote two years ago.
****************************
Re-Posting
From November 23, 2022.
On buying a house, these are my observations for folks in my socioeconomic demographic:
- the price of the house is of little importance (don't take that out of context):
- the house bought is based on the monthly outlay (principal, interest, insurance, property taxes, etc)
With "free money" or interest rates at zero percent:
- folks will buy a $400,000 house for $600,000;
With "expensive money" or interest rates at twelve percent:
- folks will buy a $600,000 house for $400,000.
Experts / realtors will tell folks to buy the "most" house they can afford
- that they can afford = monthly cash outflow
Monthly cash outflow:
- if folks think they can afford $3,000 / month, the realtor will convince the buyers they can come up with $4,000 / month
- buyers will come up with $3,600 / month on their "back-of-the-envelope" budget
- if they were able to budget $3,000 / month, they will do whatever it takes to come up with that extra $600 / month
- buying a home becomes a way to force one to save
$600 / month =
- $6 / day at Starbucks, five days a week, 20 days a month = $120
- four nights / month out for dinner for a family of four, $100 x 4 = $400
The first two years will be incredibly tough, very painful for the family.
At the end of the first two years, the family will become used to meeting the monthly mortgage.
By the third year, the family may, in fact, have more disposable income than they did two years earlier
- (pay raise; wife returns to work; second job; more overtime; bonuses; inheritance; family help; tax breaks with a big house)
Interest rates tend to cycle, fluctuate, change (not always, granted).
If
the family buys the $600,000-house for $400,000 with "expensive money"
they will be in a very different place two years after they buy the
house than if the family buys a $400,000-house for $600,000 with "free
money.
Now, break, break. Where would you rather be two
years from now: in a $400K house you bought for $600K with "free money"
or in a $600K house you bought for $400K with "expensive money."
We're going to stop here and come back to this tomorrow.
My thoughts may be very naive, but playing devil's advocate this is where I am right now in this thought experiment.
I thought about this on November 5, 2022, just three weeks ago, and I posted a short note on the blog at the time.
Investing: best years of investing in front of us.
Consider the source, a goldbug, but I can't disagree.
"Expect five years more of problematic inflation."
Two points:
- the gap between investors and savers will widen immensely;
- this year and next will be the best two years to buy a new house.
My
thoughts have not changed. I think I'm right on this. It works in an
interest rate environment between 0% and 6%. I'm not sure if it would
work in a 14-percent environment like we had under the Carter
administration.
This "thought experiment" came up again today with the release of the University of Michigan's monthly "Surveys of Consumers.
But for now, ask yourself where you would rather be in 2026:
- owning a $400,000-house bought for $600,000 with "free money" in 2020 or,
- owning a $600,000-house bought for $400,000 with "expensive money" in 2023 (or 2024)?
If
the "$400,000-house" and the "$600,000-house" analogy is confusing or
doesn't make sense, substitute the phrase "the most house you can
afford" for the dollar figure.
And this whole thought experiment
might not make any sense to anyone but me, but I'll come back to it
tomorrow to see where my thinking is faulty.
It should be fun.
