Showing posts with label Fracking_Federal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fracking_Federal. Show all posts

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Federal Fracking Rules Implementation Delayed -- September 3, 2015

From Platts:
New federal fracking rules, originally set to take effect in June, will be delayed until at least mid-October after both sides in a federal case challenging the rules requested more time this week to submit arguments.
"Given the voluminous nature of the record, the parties agree that additional time is necessary to complete a preliminary review of the record and identify additional citations pertinent to the pending motions for a preliminary injunction," attorneys wrote in joint motion Wednesday.
US District Court of Wyoming Judge Scott Skavdahl approved the motion Thursday, setting up an expected decision in the case by mid-October.
The fracking rules at the center of the case include new chemical disclosure, well construction and fluid disclosure requirements finalized by the US Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management in June. The rules were not expected to have an immediate impact due to the limited amount of oil and natural gas production that takes place on federal lands, but are seen as a significant hurdle to drilling on roughly 700 million acres of federal land and could stymie future fossil fuel development, four states and two industry groups have argued in lawsuits.
In lawsuits, the Independent Petroleum Association of America and the Western Energy Alliance, both industry groups, along with the attorneys general from Wyoming, North Dakota, Utah and Colorado, have sought to overturn the rules.
********************************
For Friday

ObamaCare, WSJ.
Hillsboro, ND -- Agriculture Drones
Texas oil -- profitable at $15 / bbl
Private equity firms plunge back into oil and gas sector, WSJ
iPhone continues to increase lead in US smartphone market

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Wednesday -- June 24, 2015; New Federal Fracking Rules That Were To Take Effect TODAY -- US District Judge Scott Skavdahl, Casper, WY, Put Them On Ice

UPDATE on federal fracking rules: see this note. 

North Dakota rig count appears to have hit bottom -- Reuters is reporting:
The drilling rig count in North Dakota's oil patch, a closely watched metric through which many attempt to divine future crude production, appears to have hit a bottom.
For the past three weeks the count has hovered between 76 and 79, after sliding only slightly from 80 at the end of May. On June 12, the count hit 76, the lowest level since 2009. The count bobbed slightly in the ensuing days, hitting 77 on Tuesday.
It has, in short, been the longest period since oil prices started to slide last fall that the rig count has stayed in the same range, offering many in and near the No. 2 U.S. crude-producing state's energy industry a bit of solace that a nadir has been reached. In early March, for example, the count was at 113.
The apparent stabilization has produced a palpable sigh of relief around North Dakota's western oilfields, where newspapers [and the MillionDollarway blog] print the number daily.
Now, on to President Obama's "war on fracking." Bloomberg is reporting: 
The U.S. government says it can set standards for more than 100,000 wells that make up 11 percent of the nation’s natural gas output and 5 percent of its oil. The states argue they’re doing plenty to make sure fracking is done safely, so oversight should be left to them.
With the new rules set to take effect Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Scott Skavdahl in Casper, Wyoming, may decide in court who is right. Producers say they can’t afford the increased costs and lengthy delays they fear will accompany the new federal rules. Drillers are already struggling because of falling oil prices, which has led to a spate of bankruptcies and missed bond payments. Oil dropped from more than $100 a barrel to as low as $44 in March, undercutting the “shale gale” that drove U.S. production to near record levels.
 Active rigs:


6/24/201506/24/201406/24/201306/24/201206/24/2011
Active Rigs77194185210170

RBN Energy: Why Are WTI Prices Stuck at $60/Bbl? (Archived)
Prices for prompt delivery of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude as quoted on the CME/NYMEX futures exchange fell by 60% from their high over $107/Bbl in June 2014 to a low under $44/Bbl on March 17, 2015. After recovering about 37% in April and May WTI prices have remained stuck close to $60/Bbl ever since - closing yesterday (June 23, 2015) at $61.01/Bbl.
With market contango narrowing, inventory levels falling, and refinery throughputs rising – why aren’t prices moving higher faster?
Today we review the fundamental data.
For the past year oil market analysts have been busier than shrinks after Thanksgiving – trying to explain what happened and what comes next - since crude prices started falling in June 2014. As we explained last fall the root cause for the price meltdown was a worldwide increase in crude supplies coupled with a downturn in demand.
Crude from U.S. shale based production has been increasing at the rate of 1 MMb/d a year for the past three years - pushing out imports into the world market and creating increased competition between producers to retain their market share and placing downward pressure on prices. When producer group OPEC failed to signal any intent to try and prop up prices at their Thanksgiving meeting the rout gathered pace.
With too much crude and too few buyers the market condition known as contango developed where future prices are expected to be higher than spot prices today – encouraging the use of storage to “save” cheap crude today for use when prices recover.
Without new sources of demand or supply interruptions, a contango market keeps downward pressure on today’s market prices as storage fills up and becomes more difficult and expensive to find – increasing the contango spread required to cover storage costs.
In March of 2015 we described how sky-high inventory levels were still keeping up the downward pressure on crude prices. More recently we posted a blog at the beginning of June (2015) suggesting that low crude prices were here to stay in a new era of abundance.
Other analysts contend that the narrowing contango, falling inventory levels and increased refinery demand seen recently – coupled with a slow down in crude production – are signs that prices should recover further this year. In this two part blog series we look at the impact of evolving fundamental signals on prices.
************************************
This Is How Wal-Mart Will Pay Higher Wages

Reuters is reporting: Wal-Mart to impose charges on suppliers as its costs mount --
"It is not the way Walmart has done business in the past," Jetta said. "This approach suggests that they are seeking areas to offset their increased investment in wages, as well as offset their lack of organic revenue growth."
************************************
Netflix To Split 7 -1 

In soaring almost 100 percent this year, Netflix shares have reached nearly $700. As of last week, Netflix was the third-most expensive stock in the S&P 500.
I've talked about Netflix for quite some time. 

******************************************
Disclaimer

This is not an investment site. Do not make any investment or financial decisions based on what our read here or what you think you may have read here.

**********************
Collapse

The Greek deal has collapsed. Creditors refuse new terms. The new terms:
a) more bailout money for Greece
b) more promises from Greece

Friday, March 20, 2015

President Obama Says Fracking On Federal Land Okay -- Just Be Safe -- March 20, 2015

Folks a lot smarter than I can tell me that I'm wrong, but this story does not sound particularly alarming.

Reuters provides a very, very superficial look at the new rules for fracking on federal lands. About the only information:
The rules require energy companies to reinforce boreholes and otherwise prevent leakage and provide data on the cocktail of chemicals that helps extract crude oil and gas out of the ground. The rules will add transparency to the practice, long shrouded by companies reluctant to reveal "trade secrets."
Most companies are providing data regarding the "cocktails."

New York State, of course, will still ban fracking while they study the issue for another 14 years.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Would Federal Permitting Stop The Bakken?

Federal permitting has stopped drilling in one of the sweet spots in the Bakken. KXNews is reporting:
An area of western North Dakota, that's proven to be a hot spot in the Bakken, is pretty much being ignored.
Oil companies say the federal government and their rules are to blame.
There are zero wells drilling in the National Grasslands in the state.
The reason, it takes too long for oil companies to get federal drilling permits.
It takes at least 180 days to drill on federal land, versus 10 days on state land.
One of the top producing wells in the state was drilled on federal land.
Jack Ekstrom with Whiting Petroleum says the federal government is forgoing potential revenue by creating a difficult situation for oil companies.
Ekstrom says, "We have a stated charge in Whiting to avoid federal acreage at all costs. Because you can't afford the delays in permits that take a year."

Thursday, August 22, 2013

For Those Hoping To See Less Flaring In The Bakken, Federal Help Is On The Way

Assuming more federal regulation will lead to less fracking, which will lead to less drilling, which will lead to less flaring, this is good news for those concerned with too much flaring in North Dakota. KOG and WPX should be concerned, and to some extent, Whiting, I suppose.  But all those folks who want to see less flaring should be out buying bottles of champagne tonight. Just don't open them yet.

Disclaimer: this is not an investment site, but I will be watching KOG share price to get an idea where analysts stand on this issue. But no one should make investment decisions based on what is posted at this blog or what they think has been posted at this blog. This is not an investment site. It is for entertainment and education, and not necessarily much of the latter.

Rigzone is reporting:
The Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) and the Western Energy Alliance (WEA) say the second draft of the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) proposed draft rule to regulate hydraulic fracturing and well construction on federal lands would undercut U.S. state authority to regulate energy production.
The industry groups submitted comments on the second draft Thursday. The proposed rule would cost the energy industry $345 million a year and discourage independent producers from exploring for natural gas and oil on federal lands, IPAA President and CEO Barry Russell said.
“Our federal system has vested the states with the authority to ensure that development of energy sources is safe and responsible,” Russell said in an Aug. 22 statement, adding that DOI should not be in the business of undermining the progress made by state regulators and local environmental groups in developing shale resources.
It was very clear to me where the new Secretary of the Interior stood on this issue. 

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Federal Fracking Regulations

I've been out all day -- out and about in southern California, so  it will take a bit of time to get caught up.

While waiting to read whatever pithy comments I might (or might not write), you may enjoy parsing this statement from the new SecInterior as reported in the Oil & Gas Journal:
Federal regulations on hydraulic fracturing would provide a necessary baseline for states where onshore unconventional oil and gas development has not taken place yet but will soon, US Sec. of the Interior Sally Jewell said. Interior also would possibly accept more-stringent requirements than some states have enacted already, she told the US House Natural Resources Committee.
Parsing:
  • federal regulations (BLM land only; all land, state, private?)
  • provide a necessary baseline (baseline only? not on-going?)
  • for states (some states, not all states; which states?)
  • where onshore (onshore only, not offshore?)
  • unconventional oil and gas development
  • has not yet taken place
  • but will soon (would that include a state like New York which has banned fracking?)
  • stricter requirements than some states have enacted already (some exemptions; examples?)