Pages

But Will It Offer Free Wi-Fi And All-Gender Bathrooms? February 4, 2019


****************************************
The Ad Page

Ranked #2 by some, I think this was the #1 Super Bowl LIII ad although the Harrison Ford / Alexa / dog food ad was certainly a close #2.


The Four Words Most Feared By A Democratic Governor: Dramatic Drop In Tax Revenue -- February 4, 2019

Updates

February 6, 2019: someone agrees with me. Stuart Varney on Fox Business -- the tax exodus has just begun; it will become a flood. 
It’s official.
The governor of New York confirms it. The tax exodus has begun.
We've been expecting this.
In New York, a $2.3 billion shortfall in state revenues. Gov. Cuomo blames the new tax law. You can only deduct $10,000 worth of state and local taxes. In high-tax states, that’s a pittance.
Result: Even middle-class people end up paying more tax, and the one-percenters are getting socked. Some of them are moving, and taking their money with them. 
February 5, 2019: Governor Cuomo changed his story overnight. Am I missing something here? No one is talking about this: Governor Cuomo's earlier complaint was the the Federal "SALT" tax deduction caused the problem. Helloooo! The SALT tax deduction / law was changed in 2018. Folks have not yet filed their 2018 returns. Unless the NY state revenue number that Governor Cuomo is talking about is an estimate he misses the bigger story. I don't know if his 2018 deficit is an estimate or if based on actual figures. Let's assume his comments were based on actual figures If so, those revenue receipts were made in calendar year 2017, not 2018. Again, payments for CY2018 are still coming in. Of course, the excessively rich were paying quarterly estimates. But the bottom line is this: rich New Yorkers were moving out of state well before 2018 and the change in the Federal "SALT" deduction. This did not happen overnight. Rich New Yorkers started their migration some years ago, probably during the Obama administration when the expectation was that Hillary would be elected president. [The New Yorkers knew Hillary much better than the rest of the country.]

So, Cuomo realizes that it was NOT the Federal SALT tax that caused the CURRENT problem. That's why he is changing his story. He does not want to go down that road, now, to increase taxes on the rich because he knows wealthy New Yorkers were leaving even before the change in the Federal tax law.

That was the first of two knock-out punches. Here's the second one.

And on this one, Governor Cuomo is correct. The Federal tax law regarding SALT goes into effect this past year, 2018, and the state will start to see the effects of that law this year, in 2019.

Cuomo sees the past: wealthy New Yorkers leaving the state because NY taxes too high.

Cuomo sees the future: it will get worse. Wealthy New Yorkers now affected by
  • high NY taxes
  • a NY federal representative that wants to increase taxes on the rich [Rep Occasional-Cortex (D)]
  • the state legislature will want to increase taxes on the wealthy before they will make spending cuts
  • the Federal "SALT" law
Original Post 

The Big Stories.

The Obama years.

The Doomsday Chronicles.

US States.

From Newsday:


Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Monday announced a dramatic drop in state income tax revenue of $2.8 billion, which he says will prompt him to revise his 2019-20 budget and reconsider spending on schools, health care and repairs to roads and bridges.
Cuomo, a Democrat, blamed the shortfall on a federal tax plan backed by Republican President Donald Trump. Cuomo said the law's cap on deductions for state and local taxes at $10,000 was to blame and suggested it is, anecdotally, triggering high-earners to leave New York. 
“At this point there is no doubt that the budget we put forward is not supported by the revenues,” Cuomo said at a State Capitol news conference. “It’s as serious as a heart attack.”
Cuomo said he’s not certain what areas might need to be cut, but said the biggest spending areas now are education, health care, infrastructure and another phase-in of a previously approved middle-class tax cut.
North Dakota Legacy Fund: growing by at least $50 million / month.

Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo bans fracking in upstate New York.

This is not rocket science. 

Who Saw This Coming? -- February 4, 2019

Patrick Kennedy: our grandchildren will never see snow. Wow, this gets tedious.

From KTLA:


Another MRO Re-Frack -- February 4, 2019; A New MRO Well Producing At 104K Bbls/Month?

Record IPs are tracked at this post.

Another MRO re-frack:
  • 19838, 1,069, MRO, Debbie Baklenko USA 12-26H, Antelope-Sanish, t6/11; cum 245K 12/18;
Recent production profile:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
SANISH12-20181413796137281699419780018940
SANISH11-2018311501544510445
SANISH10-20180000000
SANISH9-20180000000
SANISH8-20183113781503286262302152
SANISH7-20183115951455358317172540
SANISH6-201829178917543573326412696
SANISH5-201816649676153131101013
SANISH4-201819728742118151541

And typical of MRO re-fracks, a very small amount of proppant was used: 3.2 million gallons of water; 77% water by mass --


The graphic:


The wells: pending
  • 33636, 4,405, MRO, Irish USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t1/19; cum --
  • 33637 4,181, MRO, Snowman USA 41-25H, Antelope-Sanish, t1/19; cum 27K over 8 days, extrapolates to 103,691 bbls/month;
  • 33638, 4,402, MRO, Four Dances USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum 34K over 14 days, extraplates to 72,707 bbls/month

Eleven New Permits -- February 4, 2019

Active rigs: pending

$54.562/4/201902/04/201802/04/201702/04/201602/04/2015
Active Rigs63584044140

Eleven new permits:
  • Operators: Rimrock Oil & Gas (8); Equinor (3)
  • Fields: South Fork (Dunn); Last Chance (Williams)
  • Comments: Rimrock has permits for an 8-well pad in 10-148-93; Equinor has permits for a 3-well Marcia pad in 3-153-100 (see this post for a graphic of the area)
One permit canceled:
  • Equinor: a Jarold permit in Williams County.
Six producing wells (DUCs) reported as completed:
  • 31801, 1,703, CLR, Jensen 5-8H1, Chimney Butte, t12/18; cum 47K over 20 days; 
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN12-201820459404562551842412752778813487
BAKKEN11-20180000000
BAKKEN10-20180000000
BAKKEN9-201851187118737488030803
BAKKEN8-201811811810000
BAKKEN7-20181838337000
  • 33638, 4,402, MRO, Four Dances USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum 35K 12/18; (see this post)
  • 33636, 4.405, MRO, Irish USA 41-25TFH, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum --; (see this post)
  • 33637, 4,181, MRO, Snowman USA 41-25H, Antelope-Sanish, t12/18; cum 28K 12/18; (see this post)
  • 32532, 586, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-4B-9-5H, Charlson, t1/19; cum 3K over 6 days;
  • 32530, 308, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-4A-9-7H, Charlson, t1/19; cum 3K over 2 days;

Global Warming Hits SoCal: Gas Company Asks Customers To Curb Use Of Natural Gas -- Apparenlty Wind, Solar Not Dispatchable -- February 4, 2019

Another self-inflicted wound on the Southern Californians.

Link to SeekingAlpha.
  • Overnight temperatures in Los Angeles are expected to drop as low as 39 degrees F during Monday-Wednesday, ~10 degrees below normal at this time of year, before rising to near normal levels later in the week.
  • Gas supplies have been tight in Southern California this winter because of limitations on several SoCalGas pipelines and reduced availability of the Aliso Canyon storage field following a massive leak three years ago.

Update On An Incredible Re-Fracked CLR Rattlesnake Point Well -- February 4, 2019

Note: this was done quickly. There will be factual and typographical errors. It has not been proofread. I was interrupted by family commitments.

I have purposely not been updating the CLR wells in Rattlesnake Point because:
a) I have updated them often; and,
b) the folks on Wall Street will tell me I'm cherry-picking my wells to post.
But I have no choice but to post this one.

I don't have time to write my own note, and I couldn't write it any better, so here is the note I received from the reader who alerted me to this well:
If you are impressed with the Bridger well what do you think about Mountain Gap 31-10H #17100?

Mountain Gap well is a Continental re-frac that runs parallel to and about a mile west of the Bridger well.

As memory serves the initial frac on both were similar and the initial production for the several years prior to the re-frac was similar. Based on permit numbers it looks like they were permitted about the same time.

The difference? Mountain Gap was re-fracked after CLR had some history from the re-frac of Bridger. So is the difference in results based on knowledge or geology?
My notes follow:

The CLR Mountain Gap wells are tracked here, but have not been updated recently.

Okay, so before you look at the production profile of this well, note a couple of things:
  • the lousy 24-hour IP of 240, following the original open hole frack back in 2008
  • look at the production in 6/18 (June, 2018)
  • this is a 50K-well: tagged
  • compare that production with production one year earlier, 6/17 (June, 2017)
  • from the well file:
    • the plan was to extend the existing lateral by 677' to a TVD of 11,246' and a MD of 21,247'
    • introduction: COP originally drilled the Mountain Gap 31-10H .... within the Rocket prospect...the well was drilled to completion from its start on April 4, 2008, and completed on May 3, 2008. 
    • CLR acquired the well from COP and, with changing laws, was able to secure permission to drill more lateral footage in order to increase productivity of the well.
    • This report primarily concerns re-entry drilling information only, but an entirely different operator. Where available, salient points from the original drilling events have been included. [The geologist then goes into great detail about how much more they learned during the re-drill -- between the first well and the re-drill.] [It appears the geologist wanted to drill a bit longer but "due to hard-line TD restrictions, we were unable to proceed far enough to ....]
    • background gases were generally between 2600 - 3200 units over the short course of the well, with a 10,000-unit peak circulated up as reaming began
    • all three samples contained significant levels of frack sand (note how the geologist spells "frack"], though the TD sample indicated a sharp drop in the level of frack sand included. As this well was fracked in open-hole fashion by the initial operator, this is neither unexpected nor alarming
    • [the geologist believed] that we finished at least nine feet under the Upper Bakken, with the bit likely finishing in the final peak above zone
    • [by the way, some of the best writing by geologists I have seen in many, many reports that I have read -- two geologists signed off on this report, September 23, 2017]
    • the original well was drilled back in 2008; that wellbore was 8,617' total lateral: 6,364' (74%) in the target zone; 2,253' (26%) was above the target zone
    • open hole frack with 1 million lbs of sand;
    • data for the re-frack was not at the NDIC file, but according to FracFocus: 10 million gallons of water; 85% water by mass; which is a typical frack completion in 2018
So, with all that, here is the production profile (I recommend that for folks that are over the age of 56 and disciples of Art Berman -- they should be sitting down). Recent production below (full production profile at this post):

PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN12-2018312140822114191453098529649939
BAKKEN11-2018261994719791184772916528029799
BAKKEN10-20182316490162151565521907191752445
BAKKEN9-20183025164252122623631413278813140
BAKKEN8-2018313599735753453744292442309210
BAKKEN7-20183141189414275749245918433442169
BAKKEN6-20183052661527136344257604528864326
BAKKEN5-20181726682264103645028245211007145
BAKKEN4-201856946945436137901379
BAKKEN3-20180000000
BAKKEN2-20180000000
BAKKEN1-20180000000
BAKKEN12-20170000000
BAKKEN11-20170000000
BAKKEN10-20170000000
BAKKEN9-20170000000
BAKKEN8-20170000000
BAKKEN7-20170000000
BAKKEN6-2017221712403388880
BAKKEN5-201731296239371221166
BAKKEN4-2017302672315713712215

Remember, the reader who sent me this, asked me this question:
So is the difference in results based on knowledge or geology?
Here is my reply:
To answer your question, I think it's a bit of both.

I don't have the knowledge or resources to do a statistical review, but it's my impression that some fields (some locations) in the Bakken are much better for re-fracks. It may have to do with natural fracks or the geologists may have better knowledge of certain areas, for example, North Dakota's micro-seismic array may be better in some areas than others.

In addition, there is no question that, geologists and roughnecks have learned a lot over the years. The geologists have learned a lot about the geology but the roughnecks need to keep the wellbore in the  hole and now screw things up by dropping tools down the hole, etc. The roughnecks in the Bakken, I would bet, are among the best in the world. Scratch that. The best in the world.
Note: the first well, 76% of the time within the zone. I'm sure Harold Hamm's expectation is 95%+ time within the zone. I did not see that data for the second well; it's probably there if one has time to read the graphs.

But this is an incredible well.

Something Going On With CLR's Phenomenal Hawkinson Wells In Oakdale Oil Field? One Hawkinson Well Coming Up On 2 Million BOE -- Drilled Eight Years Ago -- February 4, 2019

This page will not be updated.

The Oakdale oil field and Hawkinson permit are tracked here.

These are spectacular wells.

Many were taken off line as of 6/18; another group were taken off line as of 10/18; and, yet another group was taken off line as of 11/18.

Two new wells on DRL status are now on the 18858-18861 pad:
  • 35272,
  • 35273,
Two wells of interest on this pad. Two wells with huge jump in production; one was re-fracked; the other was not.
  • 20208, IA/960, CRL, Hawkinson 2-27H, Oakdale, Bakken; t9/11; cum 452K 12/18; off line as of 6/18;
  • ******20210, 803, CLR, Whitman 2-34H, Oakdale, Bakken, t9/11; cum 1.629573 million bbls/112/18; FracFocus/NDIC: no record of refrack; huge jump 9/18;
  • 20211, AB/263, CLR, Hawkinson 3-27H, Oakdale, Bakken; t9/11; cum 385K 10/17; 
  • **** 20212, 482, CLR, Whitman 3-34H, Oakdale, Bakken; t9/11; 308K 12/18; re-fracked 9/17;
Full production profile for #20210 can be found here.

Meanwhile, the production profile for #20212 after the re-frack can be found here.

Back to #20210:
  • crude oil: 1,629,573 bbls
  • natural gas: 1,688,509 MCF = 281,371 boe
  • total: 1,910,944 boe; or 89,000 boe short of 2 million boe, drilled less than eight years ago; this well will continue to produce for 35 years

A Rose By Any Other Name Is Still A Rose -- Tunnel? This Is A Pipeline -- February 4, 2019

"Political correctness" ruined the Super Bowl LIII ads; now political correctness over in Norway.

Next to "ranking" Norwegian/Scandinavian names, this might be the best story of the day. Sent to me by a reader. I would have definitely missed it. I don't follow:
  • fjiord stories
  • floating tunnel stories
  • ABC News

With that said, here's the link.
Highway E39 in Norway is one of the most beautiful drives in the world, hugging the country's rugged west coast from Kristiansand to Trondheim.
It is 684 miles of unending scenery, including rivers and lakes, waterfalls and mountains and numerous fjords. 
But if you look carefully at a road map, E39 is something of a dotted line. Each of the breaks occurs at seven fjords -- where drivers must put their cars on a ferry to get across.
This stop-and-start, sea-and-land journey takes 21 hours.
But the government of Norway has a plan.
"Ferry-free E39" would cut the driving time almost in half with a series of bridges and tunnels across the fjords.
Video at the link.

I'm waiting for Elon Musk to weigh in on this one.


As long as I've rambled this long, some personal notes: my grandfather came from Trondheim.

From another site:

"Paul" is/was my paternal grandfather. Born in Inderøy Municipality, he always called it "Trondheim." He homesteaded near Newell, SD, that "dry, flat, empty northwestern corn of South Dakota.

*********************************** 
The Physics Page 

Quick! Without looking, who coined the term, "black hole"? I was sure I knew. I was wrong.

From Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick, c. 1992, page 94:
Compared to the hydrogen atom, the stark kernel with which [Niels] Bohr had begun his quantum revolution, the uranium atom was a monster, the heaviest atom in nature, bulked out with 92 protons and 140-odd neutrons, so scarce in the cosmos that hydrogen atoms outnumber [uranium] by seventeen trillion to one, and unstable, given to decaying at quantum mechanically unpredictable moments down a chain of lighter elements or -- this was the extraordinary news that kept Bohr at his portable blackboard all though the North Atlantic voyage [from Copenhagen to Princeton] -- splitting, when slugged by a neutron, into odd pairs of smaller atoms, barium and krypton or tellurium and zirconium, plus a bonus of new neutrons and free energy.
Krypton. Who knew?

From wiki: Superman is a fictional superhero created by writer Jerry Siegel and artist Joe Shuster. He first appeared in Action Comics #1, a comic book published on April 18, 1938.

Oasis To Report Huge Well In Early May -- February 4, 2019

The Aagvik Wells

  • 34811, 685, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 15T, Banks, t11/18; cum 174K 3/20; cum 198K 8/21; cum 204K 6/22;
  • 34239, 605, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 9B, 50 stages; 6 million lbs; Banks, t12/18; cum 233K 3/20; note the small amount of proppant for a middle Bakken well; that's the amount of proppant one would expect for a Three Forks well; cum 273K 8/21; cum 285K 6/22;
  • 34238, 640, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 8T, Banks, t12/18; cum 156K 3/20; cum 178K 8/21; cum 185K 6/22;
  • 34237, 576, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 7B, Banks, t12/18; cum 220K 3/20; cum 256K 8/21; cum 268K 6/22;
  • 34156, 853, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 14-26 14TX, Banks, t3/19; cum 214K 3/20; cum 265K 6/22;
  • 34155, 537, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 14-26 13BX, Banks, t2/19; cum 272K 3/20; cum 332K 6/22;
  • 34090, 150, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 13-26 12T, Banks, t2/19; cum 209K 3/20; cum 265K 6/22;
  • 34089, 532, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 13-26 11B, Banks, t1/19; cum 252K 3/20; cum 307K 6/22;
  • 34088, 645, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 14-26 13XX, Banks, t2/19; cum 272K 3/20; cum 238K 6/22;
  • 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 13-26 10T, Banks, t1/19; cum 196K 3/20; cum 362K 6/22;
  • 34040, 613, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 6T, Banks, t1/18; cum 169K 3/20; cum 197K 6/22;
  • 34039, 810, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 5B, Banks, t12/19; cum 226K 3/20; cum 268K 6/22;
  • 34038, dry, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 4T, Banks, --
  • 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 3BX, Banks, t11/18; cum 316K 3/20; cum 362K 6/22;
  • 34036, 543, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 2TX, Banks, t11/18; cum 152K 3/20; cum 181K 6/22;
  • 18249, 702, Oasis, Lundeen 4-26H, Banks, t6/10; cum 229K 3/20; cum 237K 6/22;
  • 17986, 501, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 1-35H, Banks, t12/09; cum 237K 3/20; cum 243K 8/21; cum 248K 6/22;
Huge jump in production, #17986:

BAKKEN8-201931135211962431983395230
BAKKEN7-2019311255149325501015798470
BAKKEN6-201930187617112405981095100
BAKKEN5-201912660563825341932890
BAKKEN4-20193011474117861040645836455360
BAKKEN3-2019311451714326110354604445734310
BAKKEN2-20192813631136161079242137352426615
BAKKEN1-20197368033563350981159313810
BAKKEN12-20180000000
BAKKEN11-20180000000
BAKKEN10-20180000000
BAKKEN9-20180000000
BAKKEN8-20180000000
BAKKEN7-201824470559100102875632

Updates

May 16 2019: another big Aagvik well was reported today --
  • 34239, 605, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 9B, 50 stages; 6 million lbs; Banks, t12/18; cum 233K 3/20;  note the small amount of proppant for a middle Bakken well; that's the amount of proppant one would expect for a Three Forks well;
#34239 is another huge Aagvik well --
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN3-20193123717239771475274977718122948
BAKKEN2-2019282825428375167248863987805638
BAKKEN1-201931305143071428399908557470415934
BAKKEN12-20183127474272973883264659064659
BAKKEN11-20181692268756274136260626

May 14, 2019: more Aagvik wells reporting -
  • 34238, 640, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 8T, Banks, t12/18; cum 156K 3/20;
  • 34237, 576, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 42-23 7B, Banks, t12/18; cum 220K 3/20;
May 5, 2019: Aagvik wells coming off the confidential list this week.

March 9, 2019: see this post for update.

Original Post

I'm going to have to start a page ranking "best" Norwegian names. We might have to start with Aagvik but Kjorstad would be a close second. The best name, of course might be a surname with either of these letters:
  • å
  • ø 
But I digress.

Huge thanks to the reader who alerted me to this well:
  • 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 BX, Banks, t11/18; cum 316K 3/20;
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN6-201922980396491362841640379103501
BAKKEN5-20193112577125891269447957449832652
BAKKEN4-20193023003229972260486149838751962
BAKKEN3-20193131769322602737886655839272728
BAKKEN2-2019284380643880269851406911379602440
BAKKEN1-20193153601537823361615805014382313905
BAKKEN12-20183159173590194172914768310086046501
BAKKEN11-2018233102530408326071051082813076739

Note: this is a 50K_well (tagged). The reader also notes that this is "section line well" -- the reader suggests that Oasis often uses a bit more proppants on such wells. 

According to the NDIC, this well will come off the confidential list on May 5, 2019.

The Banks oil field is tracked here

The graphic:



Off-line: #17986. I'll bet a six-pack of tuna (for the Kat) and/or a six-pack of Coke (for Steve) and/or a new English dictionary (for one reader in New Mexico) that this well will show a huge bump in production once it comes off line. [It did.]

The wells in the graphic:
  • 17986, 501, Oasis, Aagvik 1-35H, Banks, t12/09; cum 232K 10/19; came off line 7/18; back on line as of 1/19;
    PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
    BAKKEN6-201930187617112405981095100
    BAKKEN5-201912660563825341932890
    BAKKEN4-20193011474117861040645836455360
    BAKKEN3-2019311451714326110354604445734310
    BAKKEN2-20192813631136161079242137352426615
    BAKKEN1-20197368033563350981159313810
    BAKKEN12-20180000000
    BAKKEN11-20180000000
    BAKKEN10-20180000000
    BAKKEN9-20180000000
    BAKKEN8-20180000000
    BAKKEN7-201824470559100102875632
    BAKKEN6-20182052658701274105222
    BAKKEN5-20180000000
    BAKKEN4-20181535429119094277517
    BAKKEN3-2018318168691802176184224
  • 34038, dry, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 4T,
  • 34811, 685, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 15T, t11/18; cum 158K 10/19;
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
12-20182315544748
11-2018133710
  • 34036, 543, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 2TX, 50 stages, 4 million lbs; Banks, t11/18; cum 139K 10/19;
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
12-20182053230468
11-2018155118378
  • 34037, 1,787, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35BX, t11/18; cum 296K 10/19;
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
12-201859019100860
11-20183040828130
  • 34039, 810, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 5B, t12/18; cum 206K 10/19;
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
12-20182610758419
11-20181635511170
  • 34040, 613, Oasis, Aagik 5298 41-35 6T, Banks, t11/18; cum 155K 10/19;
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
2-20192285073685
1-20192153462332
12-20182057542041
11-2018140156195
  • 34039, see above, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 5B, Banks,
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
2-20192537687240
1-20192497879018
12-20182610758419
11-20181635511170
  •  34037, see above, Oasis, Aagvik 5298 41-35 3BX, Banks,
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
2-201943880137960
1-201953782143823
12-201859019100860
11-20183040828130