25304,2,257, QEP, Paul 2-26035TH, the Helis Grail, t12/13; cum 351K 3/19;
FracFocus says this well was re-fracked 2/12/2018 - 2/26/2018; a relatively moderate re-frack with 6.6 million gallons of water; a neighboring middle Bakken well (#25861) might have shown a very short-lived jump in production;
For newbies: operators are now going back and re-fracking older Bakken wells using relatively moderate amounts of water/proppant. This well was only five years old. Lots and lots of work left to do in the Bakken.
Previously posted (production data updated; otherwise as previously posted):
October 12, 2014: 20342,1,430, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-4B-9-1H, t11/11; cum 959K 3/19; went IA 1/14; still inactive as of 6/14; back on line and tracked here;
So, let's look where this well stands.
As noted above, this spectacular well went "inactive" in January, 2014, without explanation. As of June, 2016, it was still inactive. It went back into production in September, 2014. So it was inactive for about nine months.
Recent production:
Pool
Date
Days
BBLS Oil
Runs
BBLS Water
MCF Prod
MCF Sold
Vent/Flare
BAKKEN
3-2019
31
15487
15662
5742
23353
19428
3709
BAKKEN
2-2019
28
15132
15103
4297
21178
17453
3530
BAKKEN
1-2019
31
18660
18742
5033
24830
17676
6939
BAKKEN
12-2018
15
9183
8330
3048
10684
9086
1496
BAKKEN
11-2018
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BAKKEN
10-2018
12
3261
3644
743
7087
5811
1197
BAKKEN
9-2018
30
9277
9448
1985
16977
14265
2503
BAKKEN
8-2018
31
9216
9040
2116
17960
17618
126
BAKKEN
7-2018
31
9724
9873
2209
17890
17595
79
BAKKEN
6-2018
30
10650
11102
2855
16461
16076
176
BAKKEN
5-2018
31
11129
10573
2472
17002
16704
82
BAKKEN
4-2018
30
11191
11390
2549
16514
15353
952
BAKKEN
3-2018
31
11710
11530
2433
16543
16327
0
BAKKEN
2-2018
28
11134
11230
2470
16231
15528
508
I'm sure there's a reason for the increase in production but I do not know the reason. I doubt the mom-and-pop mineral owners really care all that much. They just love the bigger monthly royalty check.
Hubbert's "peak oil" theory certainly does not hold up in the Bakken.
This well could go over one million bbls cumulative before the end of the year.
********************************
WSJ Review: May 11-12, 2019
Nonsense and a waste of space/ink:
lead story: "Feeding a family isn't a job for mothers alone; in an era of processed foods, wholesome home cooking is more important than ever -- and men to share that burden" -- Bee Wilson
a modest proposal: offer Trump a crown and a throne, Gerard Baker, editor-at-large; another elite who doesn't understand Trump
let's farm chestnuts again; the American chestnut tree almost disappeared during the 20th century. Bringing it back could provide a new staple crop -- and help the planet. LOL. Charles C. Mann
the social secret that humans share with ants. LOL. Mark W. Moffett
John Paul Stevens: a former justice worries about the court. I'm not worried; I'm sad; the US Supreme Court seems timid
Book reviews:
books about the building of the transcontinental railroad -- excellent, but obviously a nod to the "southern surge"
the earth and us: geology and evolution; excellent
dinosaurs: excellent
who killed Dick and Jane? Dr Seuss -- excellent
A reason to visit southern California:
a Manet retrospective
Chicago's Art Institute, May 26 to Sept 8
will settle at the Getty Museum, west Los Angeles, October 8, 2019, to January 12, 2020
The file report was not helpful. A mini-unreported-re-frack? A work-over, which is not reported?
At first I couldn't find a neighboring well recently fracked and then, of all things, ad, then expanding the search, finding a BR well -- farther to the west explains it.
The BR well to the west:
34253, 207, BR, Raider 4A MBH, 37 stages; 8.7 million lbs; Twin Valley, t2/19; cum 29K 31 days;
Initial production:
Pool
Date
Days
BBLS Oil
Runs
BBLS Water
MCF Prod
MCF Sold
Vent/Flare
BAKKEN
3-2019
30
27788
27811
16006
66748
55578
10580
BAKKEN
2-2019
1
974
951
5526
721
684
0
BAKKEN
1-2019
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Look at all the story lines:
the neighboring well is 0.14 miles away; 739 feet away; generally, one thinks that 500 feet is the minimum distance required for the "halo" effect
the parent well was a CLR well; the daughter well was a BR well; in other words, CLR got a brand new well and it was due to a BR frack; what could be better?
look at the BR IP: 207; that's typical of a BR well;
look at BR's completion strategy: not a particularly large amount of sand (8.7 million lbs) but only 37 stages; these guys are getting good; a huge shoutout to Halliburton or whoever did the frack; good for them; memo to self: note to Nick Cunningham
The Bakken never fails to surprise; never fails to excite. So what if the jump in production is short-lived; a lot of mom-and-pop mineral owners are going to see an unexpected jump in their royalty check this month.
Since the parent well was a CLR well, and the daughter well was a BR well, could this be an example of "Step-Parent-Well-Uplift"?
Every well has a story. This one has many. Be sure to click on the link above (all's well that ends well).