Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Random Update Of A BR Well With An IP of Zero -- March 13, 2019

BR holds the Bakken record for the lowest IP for a well that was not dry. Pretty good for a well with an IP of zero, wouldn't you say? I remember all the talk about IPs when the Bakken boom first began. LOL.

The well:
  • 31757, 0, BR, Glacier 2-4 MBH, Clear Creek, t3/18; cum 197K 1/19;  
NDIC File No: 31757     API No: 33-053-07169-00-00     CTB No: 231396
Well Type: OG     Well Status: A     Status Date: 3/21/2018     Wellbore type: Horizontal
Location: SWSW 9-151-96     Footages: 340 FSL 610 FWL     Latitude: 47.906233     Longitude: -102.981303
Current Operator: BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY LP
Current Well Name: GLACIER 2-4 MBH
Elevation(s): 2381 KB   2348 GR   2355 GL     Total Depth: 20575     Field: CLEAR CREEK
Spud Date(s):  9/10/2017
Casing String(s):  9.625" 1852'   7" 10939'  
Completion Data
   Pool: BAKKEN     Perfs: 10939-20575     Comp: 3/21/2018     Status: F     Date: 3/21/2018     Spacing: 2SEC
Cumulative Production Data
   Pool: BAKKEN     Cum Oil: 196728     Cum MCF Gas: 317689     Cum Water: 67864
Production Test Data
   IP Test Date: 3/21/2018     Pool: BAKKEN     IP Oil: 0     IP MCF: 911     IP Water: 4976
Monthly Production Data
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN1-20193198589928638841928418510
BAKKEN12-2018311481014877648441785417080
BAKKEN11-2018301588815778584840633405590
BAKKEN10-2018301793217825762026879268050
BAKKEN9-2018301558315611672620824207500
BAKKEN8-2018311883718986441617950178730
BAKKEN7-2018312601125806817629796297190
BAKKEN6-2018222383423826636434587320722460
BAKKEN5-2018222386224017701327502274470
BAKKEN4-2018272985429507882835658355910
BAKKEN3-2018925925911470125
BAKKEN2-20180000000
Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. MikeMarch 15, 2019 at 12:43 AM

    A late bloomer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bruce OksolMarch 15, 2019 at 8:21 AM

      Regular readers of the blog have this over and over (although I don't recall an IP of zero and then turning out to be this good. One can almost guess the operator based on the IP -- they are incredibly consistent. BR has incredibly good wells but consistently reports IPs less than 500. Statoil (now Equinor) used to be accuse of huge IPs, and then very mediocre wells. Some have similar thoughts of Hess, but I think over time Hess has gotten better and better wells. Equinor seems about the same. But MRO, it seems, consistently has "monster" IPs.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)