Sunday, December 2, 2018

Lodgepole Monster Wells In The Dickinson Area -- December 2, 2018

Updates

Later, 9:23 p.m. CT: see first comment. A reader writes to say that the well of interest, #34711 was dry. 

Original Post
 
I don't plan to update production numbers on this page. Production data will be updated elsewhere.

A reader noted that this well coming off the confidential list this week might be an interesting one to watch:
  • 34711, conf, Armstrong Operating, Harvest States 7-11, Eland, no production data, 
Because it's on the confidential list, I don't know much more about it, but I will bet it's not a Bakken well. LOL. I would be very, very surprised if it's anything but a vertical (or possibly a directional) well targeting the Lodgepole.

For newbies: I talked about "Lodgepole" a long, long time ago (back in 2009). That was in the early days of the blog; I didn't know much about "oil" then so there may be amateurish errors in that post. That entry is linked at the sidebar at the right. I have not read that post lately, and I have not updated it or corrected any typographical or factual errors. 

It's my "belief" that hitting the Lodgepole in the Dickinson area is a hit or miss: if it's a "hit," it's most likely going to be a monster well; but unlike the Bakken, hitting the Lodgepole is a bit tougher. Having said that, looking at the NDIC map, there doesn't appear to be many dry holes in Eland or Patterson Lake.

Over at "monster wells" several Lodgepole wells made the cut. 

Lodgepole
The monster wells;
  • 13724, 1,752, Denbury, Ridl 11-1, Lodgepole, Eland; t3/95, cum 1.0743 million bbls 10/18;
  • 13745, 2,571, Denbury, Klein 1-23, Lodgepole, Eland; t3/95, cum 4.4112 million bbls 10/18;
  • 13755, 2,016, Denbury, Ranchos 1, Lodgepole, Eland; s3/95, t5/95, cum 4.8543 million bbls 10/18;
  • 13773, 2,908, Denbury Onshore, Privratsky 12-2, a Lodgepole well, Eland, t5/95; cum 789K 10/18;
  • 13788, 398, Debury Onshore, Patterson Lake 41-13, Eland, t4/96; cum 1.30992 million bbls 10/18;
  • 13819, 279, Scout Energy Management/Denbury, Privratsky 12A-3, Lodgepole, Eland;  t10/95, cum 2.3294 million 5/18; last produced 6/03;
  • 13886, 1,214, Scout Energy/Denbury, Roller 1-24, Lodgepole, Eland, s11/95, t12/95, cum 2.3666 million bbls 10/18;
  • 18190, 463, Armstrong Operating, Laurine Engel 1, Patterson Lake, t9/09; F; cum 854K 10/18;
  • 18496, 474, Armstrong Operating, Gruman 18-3, Patterson Lake, t3/10; F; cum 885K 10/18;
By the way, look at the production of the Lodgepole well drilled back in 2010; I find this simply incredible:
  • 18496, 474, Armstrong Operating, Gruman 18-3, Patterson Lake, t3/10; F; cum 885K 10/18;
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
LODGEPOLE10-2018311048710373474348133380
LODGEPOLE9-2018301213112348164515550170
LODGEPOLE8-201831133631323614519350500
LODGEPOLE7-20183113106130406552453810
LODGEPOLE6-201830126161256211277326300
LODGEPOLE5-20183012695126726514150030
LODGEPOLE4-20183012136122164493047920
LODGEPOLE3-20183012028120813489447560
LODGEPOLE2-20182811282113723458844590
LODGEPOLE1-20183112187121247500048570
LODGEPOLE12-20173111858117359486447210
LODGEPOLE11-20173011122112488466145230
LODGEPOLE10-20173110652106120447443310
LODGEPOLE9-201730876186380367935410
LODGEPOLE8-201724608862680257624660
LODGEPOLE7-201731789977162333631930
LODGEPOLE6-201730748576717309829600
LODGEPOLE5-201731764474587305029070
LODGEPOLE4-201730739274686291627780
LODGEPOLE3-2017317652787910289027470
LODGEPOLE2-2017286980687311267425450
LODGEPOLE1-2017317864785111303728940
LODGEPOLE12-201630795478718313629980
LODGEPOLE11-201630765977996305329150
LODGEPOLE10-201631802780230327631330
LODGEPOLE9-201630785577520178216390
LODGEPOLE8-201631826982720347933360
LODGEPOLE7-201631830183310345333100
LODGEPOLE6-201630819082070332431860
LODGEPOLE5-201617459046400181717390
LODGEPOLE4-201614357835250138613220
LODGEPOLE3-2016368574102422280
LODGEPOLE2-201614314529550113910750
Posted by at
Labels:

4 comments:

  1. AnonymousDecember 2, 2018 at 9:12 PM

    The Armstrong Harvest States well was a dry hole, plugged by the drilling rig.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bruce OksolDecember 2, 2018 at 9:22 PM

      #34711. Wow, that's too bad. AS noted, the Lodgepole -- can be hard to hit. Thank you for taking time to post. Much, much appreciated.

      Delete
  2. OilmanDecember 2, 2018 at 9:26 PM

    That stinks. I always like reading up on Lodgepole wells.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bruce OksolDecember 2, 2018 at 9:27 PM

      Agree completely. Took the wind out of my Lodgepole sail. It's a small sail, but important all the same.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)