Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Random Update Of An XTO Wildcat Drilled Back In 2005; What A Difference A Work-Over Makes -- February 6, 2018

Re-fracked or just lucky? A work-over back in January, 2017. Things to note:
  • this is a very, very old well, look at the permit number (15923); it was drilled in the fall of 2005
  • a short lateral
  • identified as a wildcat at the time of the permit
  • initial frack in January, 2006; open hole, 722K lbs proppant
  • small re-frack in 2009; 
  • no evidence of re-frack after that; see FracFocus;
  • recent work-over, but not re-fracked
  • XTO Lund wells in the local area have recently been fracked
So, mineral owners, who had been getting royalties from this well based on less than 200 bbls/month, will all of a sudden see a jump in their monthly check, based on 8,460 bbls/month (a 42x jump in production) (note: the 8,460 is extrapolated over 30 days). 

The well:
  • 15923, 80 (no typo); XTO, Titan E-Gierke 20-1-H, Siverston, t1/06; cum 49K 12/17; recent production:
Monthly Production Data:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN12-201721592059662383413911013726
BAKKEN11-2017166012001800173
BAKKEN10-20170000000
BAKKEN9-20170000000
BAKKEN8-20170000000
BAKKEN7-20170000000
BAKKEN6-20170000000
BAKKEN5-201719872272172560152
BAKKEN4-2017291762272304910318
BAKKEN3-2017312102292806020313
BAKKEN2-20171411402482640138

The graphic:


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.