SPAC -- June 23, 2017

Bloomberg.

SPAC: a unique investment vehicle known as a special purpose acquisition company.

See also this post. 

XTO WIth A Nice Re-Frack; Six DUCs Completed; Six New Permits -- June 23, 2017

Active rigs:

$43.17	6/23/2017	06/23/2016	06/23/2015	06/23/2014	06/23/2013
Active Rigs	58	30	77	190	189

Six new permits:

• Operator: Kraken Operating
• Field: Oliver (Williams)
• Comments: permits for a 6-well pad; five Washburne wells and one Washburne-Hodenfield well; all in NWNE 27-157-98; only one well in this section now: #21626 (see below)

Six producing wells (DUCs) reported as completed:

• 20376, 988, Enerplus, Fool Bear 23-34H, Antelope, Sanish pool, one section, t5/17; cum -- (#18905)
• 29878, 1,597, WPX, Etstatis 32-29HS, Eagle Nest, t6/17; cum -- (#18419)
• 29882, 1,886, WPX, Etstatis 32-29HW, Eagle Nest, t6/17; cum --
• 31189, 1,308, WPX, Poplar 32-29HE, Eagle Nest, 4 sections, t5/17; cum --
• 31627, 598, XTO, Ames Federal 31X-13F, Grinnell, t5/17; cum -- (#20582, API: 33-105-02163; March 14, 2016, sundry form suggests this well was re-fracked; see production profile below)
• 31731, 1,154, Enerplus, Flyer 152-94-23DH TF, Antelope, Sanish pool, t5/17; cum -- (#18905)

**********************

A re-frack:

• 20582, 1,645 (initial frack back in 2012), XTO, Ames 31X-13C, Grinnell, t11/12; cum 223K 4/17 

1) Monthly Production Data for most recent five months:

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	4-2017	30	19569	18716	68350	71400	52078	19144
BAKKEN	3-2017	19	11389	11155	24983	32075	0	31959
BAKKEN	2-2017	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	1-2017	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	12-2016	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

2) This well was shut-in from 9/15; to 3/17, 18+ months.

3) Monthly production after initial frack back in 2012:

BAKKEN	2-2013	28	7595	7706	2658	10676	10676	0
BAKKEN	1-2013	31	11397	11450	4812	15721	15721	0
BAKKEN	12-2012	31	14365	14472	6453	18936	16748	2188
BAKKEN	11-2012	25	17493	17215	19162	35584	0	35584
BAKKEN	10-2012	3	3589	3283	10807	8232	0	8232

******************************

Producing Well Where Kraken Has Permits For A 6-Well Pad

See Kraken's new permits above:

• 21626, 723, Kraken Operating/CLR, Hobart 1-27H, Oliver, 30 stages, 2.8 million lbs, t8/12; cum 203K 4/17;

Top 20 Retailers Likely To Succeed In Williston -- Consultant -- June 23, 2017

From the Williston Wire:

Would Williston shoppers like a Hobby Lobby, Buffalo Wings & Rings or 9 Round Kickboxing Gym in their town? The experts say yes. Buxton, a Dallas-based customer analytics company, has released its 2017 list of businesses most likely to succeed in Williston. The top 20 retail matches include popular fast food restaurants, coffee shops and grocery stores. "We see lots of opportunity with theses retailers," said Williston Economic Development executive director Shawn Wenko.

Background:

Williston Economic Development and the Williston Convention and Visitors Bureau have been working with Buxton for the past two years. The firm gathers all types of data to help WED and CVB further understand who visits Williston, how far they drive for particular goods and services, and what types of restaurants and retailers they visit.

The top 20:

• A&W: we had an A&W drive-in when I was growing up in Williston; we often brought A&W home and made our own root beer floats
• Buffalo Wings and Rings
• City Brew
• Dunn Bros Coffee
• Grizzley's 
• HuHot
• Pita Pit
• Sanford's Grub & Pub
• Sonic
• Steak 'n Shake
• Tim Hortons
• 9 Round Kickboxing Gym
• Aldi (really?)
• Bath & Body Works
• CVS Pharmacy
• Family Fair
• Hobby Lobby
• Market Place Foods
• Reynolds Market 
• Runnings

Look At The Completion Strategies For These Two CLR Maryland Wells -- June 23, 2017

The wells:

• 31754, 762, CLR, Maryland 3-16H, Catwalk, 38 stages, 17.3 million lbs, t12/16; cum 74K 4/17;
• 31755, 213, CLR, Maryland 4-16H1, Catwalk, Three Forks 1st bench, 38 stages, 11.4 million lbs, t12/16; cum 25K 4/17;

This page will not be updated; CLR's Maryland wells are tracked here. 

******************************

Dry Hole?

I'm being told by someone who checked in on the Armstrong Operating Frenzel 1-35 well (#33340) southeast of Dickinson that the well appears to be dry. This is the fourth wildcat in this section: 35-139-96. Two other dry holes targeted the Red River; the third wildcat targeted the Heath.  #33340 remains on the confidential list, all in that same section. Lodgepole? An earlier Armstrong well just outside of Dickinson (on the southwest side) was also dry (#29705, Dickinson City 1-16, targeted the Lodgepole).

******************************

Lots Of Green

Great photograph of the Missouri River / Yellowstone River confluence at this Williston Herald story.  Note the Missouri -Yellowstone Confluence Interpretive Center at the lower left in the photograph.

Foxconn's Decision To Move Manufacturing Plant To The US -- June 23, 2017

In response to an article posted about Braskem / La Porte, TX, a reader wrote:

While the focus has been on oil in this "shale revolution" saga, I think gas - both natural gas and the accompanying NGLs - will prove to be the bigger issue over time.

The fact that Foxconn is planning a multibillion dollar plant in the heart of US union country rather than expand in China is a huge story.

The combination of rock bottom prices for feedstock coupled with extraordinarily low power prices - derived from natgas fueled plants - augars well for US industry for decades to come. 

I agree completely.

There were two data points in that comment:

• the future of natural gas in the US
• the reason Foxconn is coming to the US

With regard to  Foxconn, a writer at Forbes had an interesting observation: it was all about transportation. There may be some truth to that, and right now that may be the overriding issue -- transportation costs -- moving heavy television sets and computer monitors from China to the US. With regard to transportation it may not only be costs, but also time involved and the risk of strikes at west coast ports (not a trivial concern).

But in the big scheme of things, I do think that inexpensive, accessible energy is the main driver for manufacturers coming to the US. 

Back to the linked article in case the link breaks:

News today that Foxconn, famous as the assembler of Apple's iPhone, is planning a $10 billion investment in a display production plant in the US. This is a decision driven mostly by transport costs, little else. The cost of capital doesn't vary much around the world these days, the costs of labour are converging, leaving transport costs as really the one big variable. Something small and valuable like an iPhone, transport costs are a minimal consideration. Something large like the current display systems those transport costs could indeed be the thing which swings the location decision.

Earlier in the year, Forbes had a similar article, but a slightly different take. In this, the writer argued more about "cost of time" to move things from China to the US.

Both articles were written by Tim Worstall. 

If folks have followed the stories about the strikes at the west coast ports, one wonders if that might not be the over-riding concern for an operator like Foxconn.