Saturday, September 23, 2017

Random Update Of BR's Kings Canyon #18018 -- September 23, 2017

Updates

April 4, 2020: update here.

Original Post
Take a look at the graphic at this post.

#18018 was recently off-line, but back on status.

Look at the "unusual" location of the horizontal for #29434, brought all the way over to line up exactly against #18018:



#29434, a Three Forks well, was fracked 7/8/2015, with 36 stages and 4.2 million lbs of large/small sand:
  • 29434, 1,080, BR, Kings Canyon 3-1-27MTFH, Camel Butte, 4 sections, t8/15; cum 68K 8/17;
So, the natural question is, what did the production profile for #18018, a middle Bakken well,  look like in late 2015?
  • 18018, 321, BR, Kings Canyon 21-27H, Camel Butte, API: 33-053-03012, t12/09; cum 260K 7/17:
BAKKEN5-20163155645440108513048129710
BAKKEN4-20162858745733169415196151270
BAKKEN3-201631103281030727102107620885114
BAKKEN2-20167127294442222501944288
BAKKEN1-20161781268388227513131130890
BAKKEN12-2015311694817276452310620105430
BAKKEN11-20152818994185216366810980400
BAKKEN10-201512563455412061420324291744
BAKKEN9-20150000000
BAKKEN8-20150000000
BAKKEN7-20151414640200
BAKKEN6-20150000000
BAKKEN5-20152870101841790
BAKKEN4-201530125111453401474132772

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see a middle Bakken well neighboring this well; the two wells nearest the middle Bakken well (one on either side of the middle Bakken well, #18018) are both Three Forks wells. Just saying. FracFocus does not have any data for a frack of #18018 in 2015.

In other words, #18018 was producing about 1,000 bbls/month. It was taken off line for less than six months and when it came back on line it produced almost 20,000 bbls/month or 20 months of production in one month. And that was sustained for two months and then declined quickly.

When it costs upwards of $10 million to drill/complete a well, I don't think locations of horizontals are random or coincidental.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.