Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Staggering; Random Update On Two Huge Bakken Wells -- May 5, 2015

Updates

September 20, 2015: production profile for this well updated:
  • 21963, 4,447, HRC, Fort Berthold 148-95-26A-35-2H, Eagle Nest, application specified Three Forks but it appears to be a middle Bakken well, originally 1280-acre spacing; originally Petro-Hunt application, then G3; changed to 4 sections; this well is on a 6-well pad; most of the wells have similar production profiles; still lots of flaring, no geology report; 49 stages, 5.1 million lbs; t3/15; cum 80K 3/15; 
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN7-20153117994181341130717100149011982
BAKKEN6-20152919674195471221518356156582495
BAKKEN5-201515144371454973181330512509691
BAKKEN4-20153041425414001884940867383142343
BAKKEN3-20153168893690493264966141580387886
BAKKEN2-2015241139110953834777997440191

Original Post
 
Posted just for newbies to show just how exciting the Bakken can be. Look at the production from this well in one month in the table below:
  • 21963, 4,447, HRC, Fort Berthold 148-95-26A-35-2H, Eagle Nest, application specified Three Forks but it appears to be a middle Bakken well, originally 1280-acre spacing; originally Petro-Hunt application, then G3; changed to 4 sections, no geology report; 49 stages, 5.1 million lbs; t3/15; cum 80K 3/15;The HRC Fort Berthold well produced more oil in one month than the "best well in the basin" to date:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-201515144371454973181330512509691
BAKKEN4-20153041425414001884940867383142343
BAKKEN3-20153168893690493264966141580387886
BAKKEN2-2015241139110953834777997440191
  • 27520, 6,002, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4TFH, Twin Valley, 97 stages, 4.2 million lbs, t10/14; cum 311K 3/15;
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-20152728754291523567130024129332640
BAKKEN4-201530369763708440126796167354547
BAKKEN3-20153146708462864808181103180141900
BAKKEN2-201528468814742041871461031437972250
BAKKEN1-2015315243052198409314190112851613323
BAKKEN12-201431521035190436641239711151658744
BAKKEN11-201430508235126841551120694242869581
BAKKEN10-20143161727606151221311729111381105860
BAKKEN9-2014270004400

Think of all the story lines:
  • middle Bakken vs Three Forks
  • significant difference in IPs
  • first month production vs record second month protection
  • 91 stages vs 49 stages
  • similar amounts of proppant

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.