Monday, April 29, 2024

Tesla -- April 29, 2024

Locator: 47104EVS.

We can talk about this article tomorrow. Too late tonight; I'm heading for bed, some music, some reflection.

Breaking news

Samsung Electronics’ operating profit jumps 933% in first quarter, beats expectations.

CPUs, GPUs, Cores, Threads, And All That Jazz -- Part 2 -- April 29, 2024

Locator: 47103TECH.

Updates

June 21, 2024:

Pet peeve: when knowledgeable (?) financial analysts refer to "chips" as commodities. 

Tech: wow, things move quickly. 

It was very fortuitous that I did a "deep dive" into CPUs, GPUs, and all that jazz (see original post below), back on April 29, 2024 -- wow, that was less than two months ago. In less than two months, we have gone from talking about 7-nm chips to talking about 3-nm CPUs, GPUs and NPUs, along with cores, and now we have performance cores and efficiency cores. And "they're" all chips. And anyone who says chips are commodities display a level of ignorance that is mind-boggling. I'm not saying that the success and failure of chip makers won't change over the years, but chip makers aren't in the commodity business.

Phones: is this what it comes down to? This needs to be fact-checked

  • Apple iPhones: in-house chips, currently A-series; ARM-based.
  • Android: Qualcomm Snapdragon; ARM-based;
  • Huawei: Kirin series, made by Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC; a Chinese company, and Chinese-designed chips.

Battery: years ago, Steve Jobs said his biggest challenge was batteries. 

To the best of my knowledge, there has not been a lot of advances in battery technology -- at least there are not many headlines.
My hunch, at some point, Apple pivoted. Realizing that solving the battery problem (SUPPLY) was not going to happen any time soon, they turned to DEMAND. And that meant specialized chips, more efficient chips, smaller chips, chips that can be placed together more closely, and chips that work better together (are optimized for each other). All of those factors could reduce DEMAND, and thereby lengthen the intervals between charging. The holy grail? Twenty-four hours of high demand use (gaming and movies) on the smallest iPhones (with a side benefit, less heat). Specialized chips: CPUs, GPUs, NPUs. More efficient chips: performance cores and efficiency cores. Smaller chips: 3-nm. Placed on one chip: SoC. Optimized: in-house synergetic software.

Original Post

So, humor me. We might learn something. I know nothing about this but it could be an interesting rabbit hole to explore.

This goes back to one of my better blogs on "CPUs, GPUs, cores, threads, and all that jazz." 

In the first sentence I mentioned FinFET and GAAFET but TLDR. Tonight I was curious, so I followed the link. Fortunately the link still worked and the article was still accessible. 

Now I understand "FinFET"and to some extent "GAAFET."

This is not a trivial subject for an investor. This article was posted April 17, 2023, one year ago. This paragraph jumped out at me:

The leading semiconductor manufacturers (TSMC in Taiwan, Samsung in Korea, and Intel in the U.S.) are on the cusp of introducing a major change in transistor morphology. [Remember: this was back in 2023 -- last year.]

This new configuration is called GAA, GAAFET (Gate All Around), RibbonFET, MBC, MBCFET (Multi-Bridge-Channel) Nanosheet transistor, or Nanowire transistor, depending on the author. In this article, I will use the term GAAFET.

This seems important to know if one wants a bit of insight into investing in this arena.

Time to get the "reader's digest" version of all this. To wiki we go: link here. It will take a while to go through all of this but look at just this one section:

The first FinFET transistor type was called a "Depleted Lean-channel Transistor" (DELTA) transistor, which was first fabricated in Japan by Hitachi Central Research Laboratory's Digh Hisamoto, Toru Kaga, Yoshifumi Kawamoto and Eiji Takeda in 1989.

The gate of the transistor can cover and electrically contact the semiconductor channel fin on both the top and the sides or only on the sides. The former is called a tri-gate transistor and the latter a double-gate transistor. A double-gate transistor optionally can have each side connected to two different terminal or contacts. This variant is called split transistor. This enables more refined control of the operation of the transistor.

Indonesian engineer Effendi Leobandung, while working at the University of Minnesota, published a paper with Stephen Y. Chou at the 54th Device Research Conference in 1996 outlining the benefit of cutting a wide CMOS transistor into many channels with narrow width to improve device scaling and increase device current by increasing the effective device width.

This structure is what a modern FinFET looks like. Although some device width is sacrificed by cutting it into narrow widths, the conduction of the side wall of narrow fins more than make up for the loss, for tall fins.

The device had a 35 nm channel width and 70 nm channel length.

The potential of Digh Hisamoto's research on DELTA transistors drew the attention of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which in 1997 awarded a contract to a research group at the University of California, Berkeley to develop a deep sub-micron transistor based on DELTA technology.

The group was led by Hisamoto [Hitachi] along with TSMC's Chenming Hu. The team made the following breakthroughs between 1998 and 2004.[16]

  • 1998 – N-channel FinFET (17 nm) – Digh Hisamoto, Chenming Hu, Tsu-Jae King Liu, Jeffrey Bokor, Wen-Chin Lee, Jakub Kedzierski, Erik Anderson, Hideki Takeuchi, Kazuya Asano
  • 1999 – P-channel FinFET (sub-50 nm) – Digh Hisamoto, Chenming Hu, Xuejue Huang, Wen-Chin Lee, Charles Kuo, Leland Chang, Jakub Kedzierski, Erik Anderson, Hideki Takeuchi
  • 2001 – 15 nm FinFET – Chenming Hu, Yang-Kyu Choi, Nick Lindert, P. Xuan, S. Tang, D. Ha, Erik Anderson, Tsu-Jae King Liu, Jeffrey Bokor
  • 2002 – 10 nm FinFET – Shibly Ahmed, Scott Bell, Cyrus Tabery, Jeffrey Bokor, David Kyser, Chenming Hu, Tsu-Jae King Liu, Bin Yu, Leland Chang
  • 2004 – High-κ/metal gate FinFET – D. Ha, Hideki Takeuchi, Yang-Kyu Choi, Tsu-Jae King Liu, W. Bai, D.-L. Kwong, A. Agarwal, M. Ameen

They coined the term "FinFET" (fin field-effect transistor) in a December 2000 paper, used to describe a non-planar, double-gate transistor built on an SOI substrate.

I'll come back to this later, but probably won't post any more blogs on it for awhile (if ever).

The reason this is important to me is to sort out how Broadcom (AVGO) fits into this puzzle. Why? Because of this in a Motley Fool article:

While many investors consider Nvidia the quintessential artificial intelligence (AI) stock, almost every company listed above is well positioned to monetize AI.

For instance, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon are the three largest cloud computing companies in the world, meaning they are gatekeepers of AI infrastructure and platform services. Broadcom is the leader in application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), meaning it helps companies like Meta Platforms and Alphabet design custom AI chips.

Similarly, Tesla is designing full self-driving software and its supercomputer (Dojo) is purpose-built for training computer vision systems; both represent potentially significant revenue streams. Finally, Advanced Micro Devices is the second largest supplier of data center GPUs, though it trails Nvidia's market share by about 90 percentage points.
And how did I happen on that Motley Fool article? I was checking up on QQQ. I'll talk about QQQ later in another blog, but I posted a bit earlier this evening.

I typed out the entire "portfolio" of QQQ which was an incredibly worthwhile exercise. I can't post the QQQ portfolio because it's too long but I highly recommend investors interested in the semiconductor sector spend some time looking at the QQQ fund. 




CNBC -- HSY -- April 29, 2024

Locator: 47102INV.

CNBC had a live interview earlier today and discussed HSY and cost of cocoa. I was watching the crash in the price of cocoa in real time and the ticker price of HSY rising in real time, and CNBC never caught it while interviewing the "analyst / expert" on HSY, and why HSY was continuing to go down in price. 

The producer was not paying attention; failed to call an audible for the CNBC journalist interviewing the HSY analyst / expert.

Link here.


Two CLR Bohmbach Wells With A Great Jump In Production -- April 29, 2024

Locator: 47101B.

 The wells:

  • 18911, 428, CLR, Bohmbach 2-35H, Elm Tree, t7/10; cum 436K 2/24;
  • 18137, 472, CLR, Bohmbach 1-35H, Elm Tree, t7/09; cum 422K 2/24;

18137:

BAKKEN8-201831937289485887129951248493
BAKKEN7-201831102991036267991176210883460
BAKKEN6-20183011549115097464117251125890
BAKKEN5-20182811135107008098149101462569
BAKKEN4-20180000000
BAKKEN3-20180000000
BAKKEN2-2018121285433033
BAKKEN1-201882874795239130824
BAKKEN12-2017311208136023818361460128
BAKKEN11-201730119076023516621258164
BAKKEN10-2017311276158830225342166120
BAKKEN9-201730132999325621851339614
BAKKEN8-2017311524171940929072308361
BAKKEN7-2017158857801381422620705
BAKKEN6-201728123313533151883956712
BAKKEN5-2017311537129444123761880249
BAKKEN4-201730102311761081766143690
BAKKEN3-201731993751821764142393
BAKKEN2-20172883610015815881257135
BAKKEN1-201731121513301952305197893

18911:

BAKKEN11-20183013042130287460319363145490
BAKKEN10-20183121772220151119538875369751481
BAKKEN9-20183024572240761159228291258942133
BAKKEN8-20183133693334386342143505290
BAKKEN7-201831346135624659392224761039
BAKKEN6-2018282296232532421708141357
BAKKEN5-2018233230295045412911266669
BAKKEN4-2018003890000
BAKKEN3-20180000000
BAKKEN2-20180000000
BAKKEN1-2018124202569870056836
BAKKEN12-201731112012801902115177493
BAKKEN11-201730103656625319501576134
BAKKEN10-2017311104133629322511883120
BAKKEN9-2017301091117319721141432442
BAKKEN8-2017311142111922624521883321
BAKKEN7-201731111384620221101061815

Investing -- Commentary -- April 29, 2024

Locator: 47100INV.

In all my years of investing -- since 1984 -- wow, that's 40 years -- hopefully I've learned something along the way -- I've never seen anything like this market. 

I cannot recall any time when the best sector surged, like the current tech sector surged, and seems to be "real." This is unlike the dot-com surge/bubble in the 1990s (Investopedia) which I remember very, very well. 

We won't know for several years if it's another bubble but right now, unlike the dot-com bubble, the surging sector -- the tech sector actually has a product to sell and can't keep up with demand. 

So, there's that. An AI-surge that doesn't seem to be an AI-bubble.

Then this: this is the longest bull market ever. Again, this is the longest bull market in history. It began in 2009 and any pullback was an anomaly -- the 2020 - 2021 Covid lockdown -- smart investors kept investing through that pullback and by 2023, the bull market trend was back on track.

So, there's that. The longest bull market in history.

Then, this: the bull market shows no slowing despite the Fed doing what it can to slow the market. That's not their mandate, but that's what the Fed is doing -- call it "collateral damage" --  trying to tame inflation. 

So, there's that. 

But this is what's really, really huge.

The huge demographic change between what's going on now and what was going on during the past five bubbles.

Right now, the largest transfer of wealth in the history of humankind.

**********************
QQQ

Link here.

There are 100 tickers in the QQQ. Remember Peter Lynch? 20 companies (tickers). His bio is worth a read.

We'll talk about this later. See this post for the beginning of this discussion.