Monday, July 30, 2018

The Decline Rate In The Permian -- July 30, 2018

This is pretty hilarious. Remember all those horror stories about the "decline rates" in the Bakken? I don't hear much chatter about decline rates in the Bakken any more.

But now we're starting to hear about decline rates in the Permian. From Rigzone: Permian decline rate inaccuracies risky for operators, investors. (Journalists show risk of letting others write the headlines):

From the linked article:
The Permian has thousands of vertical wells that have been producing for decades, but the relative immaturity of the Wolfcamp compared to other zones means pure field data for horizontal tight-oil wells goes back just eight years. Because of this, proxy values based on decades-old data from vertical wells and other shale plays have often been used to determine tight-oil terminal decline rates.
“The challenges of modeling tight well estimated ultimate recoveries (EURs) are growing and accurately selecting a representative terminal decline rate is not always straightforward,” Ryan Duman, principal analyst with Wood Mackenzie’s Lower 48 upstream team, said in a release. “It may have been historically, but using those assumptions for today’s Wolfcamp wells in the Permian may contribute to inaccurate volume assessments and valuations.”
While Wood Mackenzie’s analysis shows terminal decline rates for the Permian’s vertical wells is between five percent and 10 percent annually, the most common terminal decline value observed in mature horizontal Wolfcamp wells is 14 percent.
Once the decline rates are adjusted to reflect the more realistic 14 percent scenario, it’s realized that terminal declines are a long-term risk to production. By 2040, nearly 800,000 barrels per day of Permian production is lost.
Much more at the link.

Sounds like the Bakken to me, during the boom. 

*****************************
A Note for the Granddaughters

One of the traditions with the granddaughters is reading Black Beauty, Anna Sewell, 1877. I first read it to the older granddaughter and then the middle granddaughter. I don't recall Olivia caring for the book all that much, but I must have read the book to Arianna, the older granddaughter, at least three times during pre-school and early elementary grades.

The took follows the life of a single horse from a young horse -- I don't recall if it went all the way back to his life as a colt -- through old age, and how his life changed throughout his life. It was told through the eyes of the horse. It's a beautiful book, a beautiful story.

The other night I read the first chapter to Sophia who just turned four years old in July, 2018. She isn't ready for Black Beauty but she "stayed with me" for the entire first chapter.

One of the reasons I love the book was reading about all the kinds of horse carriages. So, this passage in The Victorians, A. N. Wilson, c. 2003, pp. 261 - 262:
Mrs Warren reckoned in A House and Its Furnishing (1860s, England) that a six-roomed house could be run if you had an income of £200 per annumA New System of Practical Domestic Economy estimated that you should set aside 10 percent of your income on horses or carriages, which would mean you needed £1,000 for a four-wheeler with horses. (The coachman would be paid for out of the 8 percent you would spend on the wages of male servants.) If you had £600 a year you could keep two horses if your groom doubled as a footman. A gig cost £700: that is, a one-horse carriage -- a tilbury or a chaise.
This was the great era of 'carriage folk.' At the beginning of the [19th] century, elliptic springs had made this soon-to-be-obsolete mode of transport enjoy a magnificent flowering. The berlin, barouche, calèche, coupé, clarence, daumont, landau and phaeton all crowded the streets of London in the supposedly prosaic railway age.

In 1814, there were 23,000 four-whelled vehicles in the capital; by 1834, 49,000; by 1864 [think, US Civil War], 102,000, with a further 170,000 two-wheelers.

This represents a huge social class, as well as huge congestion in the streets; and it is this class, this immensely privileged class, probably more comfortable than any human class who had ever existed on the planet, whose offspring were the first with the leisure and time to have a childhood.
If I remember, I will keep the reader updated with the types of carriages mentioned in Black Beauty.

Oil Bulls Have A Nice Day; XTO WIth Permits For A 5-Well Pad In Grinnell Oil Field -- July 30, 2018

Active rigs:

$69.967/30/201807/30/201707/30/201607/30/201507/30/2014
Active Rigs63613573191

Seven new permits:
  • Operators: XTO (5); Lime Rock (2)
  • Fields: Grinnell, Alger
  • Comments: XTO has permits for a 5-well Michael State Federal pad in NWNE 16-154-96; Lime Rock has permits for a two-well Anderson pad in SWSW 12-155-92;
Three permits renewed:
  • Newfield (2): two Bernice permits in McKenzie County
  • Enerplus: a Mars permit in Dunn County
Three permits canceled:
  • Oasis: two Jensen permits and one O. M. Erickson permit, all in Williams County
Five producing wells (DUCs) completed:
  • 31294, 878, Slawson, Serpent Federal 7-36-32TFH, Big Bend, t5/18; cum 54K 6/18; (#21570)
  • 32899, n/d, CLR, Dvirnak 9-7H, Jim Creek, t--; cum --
  • 33648, n/d, CRL, Ransom 9-30HSL, Elidah, t--; cum --
  • 33649, n/d, CRL, Ransom 8-30HSL2, Elidah, t--; cum --
  • 33650, n/d, CRL, Ransom 7-30H, Elidah, t--; cum --

US Germans Following The "Road To Germany" -- July 30, 2018

A recurring theme on the blog is that the "global warming" movement is a scam. It is simply cronyism, transferring US wealth from gullible Americans to friends/lobbyists in the wind/solar business through the Federal government, literally a type of money laundering, or wealth transfer if "money laundering" is too inflammatory. [Money laundering? See this post, and perhaps even better, this link.]

This is why faux environmentalists are faux:
  • solar and wind energy will never be able to meet significant demands for electricity; solar and wind will simply have a niche role; and,
  • the only thing that can supplant fossil fuel and lower CO2 emissions -- for what it's worth -- is going to be nuclear energy
In fact, we are now starting to see the demise of nuclear energy worldwide (previously posted; see below). And in the US? Nuclear energy is dead -- 2017.

Now this article from Iowa: NextEra will retire an Iowa nuclear plant in less than two years. Wow. Another nuclear plant to be retired. Data points:
  • Duane Arnold nuclear plant
  • 601 MW
  • at $2.5 million / MW, it would take a $1.5 billion wind farm to replace that one nuclear reactor; apparently there is already adequate wind energy to cover this nuclear plant closing
  • the #1 buyer of electricity from this nuclear plant, Alliant Energy, will buy its electricity from NextEra wind farms
  • utility customers in Wisconsin are promised to see lower utility bills -- LOL -- let's come back to this in ten years
  • the college students in Madison, WI, will feel good with the deal, although their parents who actually pay the utility bills may not have the same feeling
  • short term, Alliant will have to pay $110 million for this deal -- I assume these "costs savings" will be passed onto their customers
Wisconsin, Iowa: huge, huge German-ancestry population. They may want to click on "road-to-Germany."  

It will be interesting to see what the rate is next year and five years out. In 2011, Wisconsin paid an average of 13 cents/kwh. Now, in 2018, Wisconsin, the average rate is 15.21 cents.

From 2018, chooseenergy.com, the ten states with the lowest cost for electricity:
Highest electricity rates -- wow, look at Massachusetts, which is likely to get Amazon HQ2:


*************************************
Energy Demand By Source

With demise of nuclear energy, fossil fuel demand will grow.

Coal isn't going away.

Crude oil will continue to grow.

Renewables will really grow, but remember: renewable energy includes hydroelectric power.


Nuclear power doesn't grow much either. And then this, US nuclear power industry on verge of collapse, July 12, 2018.

It's hard to read, but I do believe the rate of growth of natural gas is actually steeper than renewable energy in the out-years.

Bakken Casualties -- Motorcylcists -- July 30, 2018

Another motorcycle fatality in western North Dakota, this one near Killdeer. I think this is the fourth motorcycle casualty reported in the Bakken in the past month. Link at The Bismarck Tribune.

Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. 

So, how's the market doing today?
  • Dow: down about 46 points; other indices also in the red; NASDAQ down 1%
  • WTI: drops back below $70, but still up 1.86% for the day
  • CVX: up 1.31%
  • COP: up 1.26% -- I still highly recommend folks read the most recent COP earnings transcript to learn more about the Bakken;
  • OAS: up 1.85%, but off it's recent highs
    NOG: up an astounding 4.46%, now trading near $3.40
  • SRE: flat;
  • Chesapeake: surges after announcement to sell assets in the Utica;
  • AAPL: down about a percent; going into tomorrow when earnings reported after-hours;
    TSLA: well below $300 -- the threshold at which traders get back into this trading stock; now, below $290 and it continues to drop; now down about 3%; volume? way down; traders waiting? certainly reminiscent of share price action, March - April, 2018; one wonders if the June, 2017, peak was "too far, too fast"? trading range since then, but recent trend concerning for those with large positions in TSLA
Disclaimer: this is to an investment site. This is the same idle chatter I would have if I were at the "deli" in Williston, ND.

What else? How are the pipelines doing? Most of which I've lost interest in.
  • ENB: up a percent; paying just under 6%;
  • EPD: down a percent and a half; paying 6%;
  • ETP: up 1.3%; paying almost 12%;
  • TransCanada (TRP): flat, paying 4.8%;
  • KMI: down about 3/4th percent; paying 4.4%
  • WMB: up 1.6%; paying almost 5%; enters the DJ, exits the Four Corners Area;
Others:
  • BRK-B: up about half a percent
  • UNP: up about a quarter percent
  • CAT: up 1.3%
  • DE: down a quarter percent; well off it's 52-week high; a buying opportunity? a P/E of 25;
Stock picker's market.

Watch: CBS -- we've seen this movie so many times, it's an open-book test.

10-year bond: under 3% but just barely
TSLA bonds: just bounced off "threshold" of "88"

*******************************
Speaking of Casualties: Netflix In Free Fall

A reader spotted this some weeks ago.

Disclaimer: cause and effect has not been proved.

Netflix announces that former-President Obama has signed with the network.

Netflix is now in free fall.


QEP Re-Fracks Its MHA Wells In Deep Water Creek Bay -- July 30, 2018

For newbies: I've always maintained the number of rigs in the Bakken was irrelevant with regard to the amount of production (do not take that out of context). For me, the purpose of tracking the number of wells was that it was a good indicator of the amount of activity in the Bakken. The other reason, of course: everyone tracks rig count, even if it really doesn't matter any more. LOL.

I digress.

If folks have been paying attention, the number of rigs in the Bakken has actually been decreasing these last couple of weeks after hitting a recent high of 70. And yet, we are going to see new production records for the next several months. What's going on? Re-fracks. And re-fracks are not reflected in rigs counts.

I assume QEP has been re-fracking for awhile; I don't know. But now we have some examples of QEP re-fracking. This was in a field not often followed by me. I will have to go back and check QEP's "Helis Grail" field. [Later: yup. QEP has begun re-fracking in the Bakken. Link here to Grail oil field.]

The well:
  • 20271, 592, QEP, MHA 5-13-14H-150-91, Deep Water Creek Bay, API - 33-055-00142; t12/17; cum 231K 5/18; no report of the re-frack in the file report, but at FracFocus, 10/16/17 - 10/25/17; 6.6 million gallons of water; 85% water;
Production profile:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-201824729372621034840562191801
BAKKEN4-20183010172102591387951203599362
BAKKEN3-20181660885866908535642160690
BAKKEN2-2018238117821011207480924071301
BAKKEN1-201831117121160026148751023853649
BAKKEN12-201731134741342240361880810476690
BAKKEN11-2017227098699147916445504163
BAKKEN10-20170000000
BAKKEN9-201772421956776760
BAKKEN8-2017316716702323213210
BAKKEN7-2017318688652878764551
BAKKEN6-2017293453349469974217
BAKKEN5-2017318869202276709242
BAKKEN4-2017304844634276382300

And I find this interesting. This well is pretty isolated. There are only three horizontal wells in this drilling unit.
  • 20271, above
  • 19683, on the same pad, and paralle with #20271, also re-fracked; 766, QEP, MHA 2-13-14H-150-91, Deep water Creek Bay, t12/11; cum 231K 5/18; huge jump in production; same profile as above;
  • 17940, a bit farther south on a separate two-well pad, also re-fracked, 1,217, QEP, MHA 1-13-14H-150-91, t1/10; cum 367K 5/18; production profile:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-20183111676117907444493526771011
BAKKEN4-20181968166562885326891733248
BAKKEN3-20181966906982595337352202670
BAKKEN2-20182491058923948048333508390
BAKKEN1-201830150351533916952835138343937
BAKKEN12-201731191391869737343908434575219
BAKKEN11-20171545194206418010850854
BAKKEN10-20170000000
BAKKEN9-2017624125216913491981151
BAKKEN8-20173114361446848105410540
BAKKEN7-20173115321588918166112382
BAKKEN6-201730165916659132095792895
BAKKEN5-2017311792175496920993211357