Saturday, November 10, 2018

An MRO Stohler Well With Huge Jump In Production -- And Not Re-Fracked -- November 10, 2018

I recently removed this well, #16333, from the list of wells that I was following.  Part of the story was #16860:
August 25, 2018: 16333, MR0, re-fracked 4/18; come back to this; off-line 3/18; remains off-line 8/18; neighboring well, #16860, off-line same time; still off-line 8/18; neighboring well a TFH well, #30266, not taken off-line during this period, huge production -- 117K in 3.5 months;
Well, lookeee here!
  • 16860, 348, MRO, Stohler 41-3H, Bailey, t2/08; cum 409K 9/18; recent production:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN9-201830101211009711123836263481339
BAKKEN8-201828119101184615702102108432983
BAKKEN7-20180000000
BAKKEN6-201800400000
BAKKEN5-20180000000
BAKKEN4-2018001110000
BAKKEN3-2018201839186011511598327997
BAKKEN2-2018282718268115111845744754
BAKKEN1-20183127472772130827091620705
BAKKEN12-201731302030121461289424800

Was this well re-fracked? Nope.

I didn't think this was supposed to happen. All the "peak oil" folks and the "conventional oil" folks tell me that once a well starts declining, one shouldn't see a jump in production (during primary production). But here we have yet another example of the "Bakken phenomenon."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.