An MRO Stohler Well With Huge Jump In Production -- And Not Re-Fracked -- November 10, 2018

I recently removed this well, #16333, from the list of wells that I was following.  Part of the story was #16860:

August 25, 2018: 16333, MR0, re-fracked 4/18; come back to this; off-line 3/18; remains off-line 8/18; neighboring well, #16860, off-line same time; still off-line 8/18; neighboring well a TFH well, #30266, not taken off-line during this period, huge production -- 117K in 3.5 months;

Well, lookeee here!

• 16860, 348, MRO, Stohler 41-3H, Bailey, t2/08; cum 409K 9/18; recent production:

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	9-2018	30	10121	10097	11123	8362	6348	1339
BAKKEN	8-2018	28	11910	11846	15702	10210	8432	983
BAKKEN	7-2018	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	6-2018	0	0	40	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	5-2018	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	4-2018	0	0	111	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	3-2018	20	1839	1860	1151	1598	327	997
BAKKEN	2-2018	28	2718	2681	1511	1845	744	754
BAKKEN	1-2018	31	2747	2772	1308	2709	1620	705
BAKKEN	12-2017	31	3020	3012	1461	2894	2480	0

Was this well re-fracked? Nope.

I didn't think this was supposed to happen. All the "peak oil" folks and the "conventional oil" folks tell me that once a well starts declining, one shouldn't see a jump in production (during primary production). But here we have yet another example of the "Bakken phenomenon."