Previously posted (production data updated; otherwise as previously posted):
- October 12, 2014: 20342, 1,430, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-4B-9-1H, t11/11; cum 959K 3/19; went IA 1/14; still inactive as of 6/14; back on line and tracked here;
As noted above, this spectacular well went "inactive" in January, 2014, without explanation. As of June, 2016, it was still inactive. It went back into production in September, 2014. So it was inactive for about nine months.
Recent production:
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 31 | 15487 | 15662 | 5742 | 23353 | 19428 | 3709 |
| BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 28 | 15132 | 15103 | 4297 | 21178 | 17453 | 3530 |
| BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 31 | 18660 | 18742 | 5033 | 24830 | 17676 | 6939 |
| BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 15 | 9183 | 8330 | 3048 | 10684 | 9086 | 1496 |
| BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 12 | 3261 | 3644 | 743 | 7087 | 5811 | 1197 |
| BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 30 | 9277 | 9448 | 1985 | 16977 | 14265 | 2503 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 31 | 9216 | 9040 | 2116 | 17960 | 17618 | 126 |
| BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 31 | 9724 | 9873 | 2209 | 17890 | 17595 | 79 |
| BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 30 | 10650 | 11102 | 2855 | 16461 | 16076 | 176 |
| BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 31 | 11129 | 10573 | 2472 | 17002 | 16704 | 82 |
| BAKKEN | 4-2018 | 30 | 11191 | 11390 | 2549 | 16514 | 15353 | 952 |
| BAKKEN | 3-2018 | 31 | 11710 | 11530 | 2433 | 16543 | 16327 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 2-2018 | 28 | 11134 | 11230 | 2470 | 16231 | 15528 | 508 |
I'm sure there's a reason for the increase in production but I do not know the reason. I doubt the mom-and-pop mineral owners really care all that much. They just love the bigger monthly royalty check.
Hubbert's "peak oil" theory certainly does not hold up in the Bakken.
This well could go over one million bbls cumulative before the end of the year.
********************************
WSJ Review: May 11-12, 2019
Nonsense and a waste of space/ink:
- lead story: "Feeding a family isn't a job for mothers alone; in an era of processed foods, wholesome home cooking is more important than ever -- and men to share that burden" -- Bee Wilson
- a modest proposal: offer Trump a crown and a throne, Gerard Baker, editor-at-large; another elite who doesn't understand Trump
- let's farm chestnuts again; the American chestnut tree almost disappeared during the 20th century. Bringing it back could provide a new staple crop -- and help the planet. LOL. Charles C. Mann
- the social secret that humans share with ants. LOL. Mark W. Moffett
- John Paul Stevens: a former justice worries about the court. I'm not worried; I'm sad; the US Supreme Court seems timid
- books about the building of the transcontinental railroad -- excellent, but obviously a nod to the "southern surge"
- the earth and us: geology and evolution; excellent
- dinosaurs: excellent
- who killed Dick and Jane? Dr Seuss -- excellent
- a Manet retrospective
- Chicago's Art Institute, May 26 to Sept 8
- will settle at the Getty Museum, west Los Angeles, October 8, 2019, to January 12, 2020
Your dates don't make sense. Well completed OCT14 but inactive JAN14. Huh?
ReplyDeleteOh, I see the misunderstanding. The well was completed in 2011; you can see that by the test date of 11/11. So the well was completed in late 2011, and it went inactive around January, 2014, possibly in 2013.
DeleteI date all my entries: the entry was originally made October 12, 2014; when I'm tracking a well, I try to post the date of the update but I don't always remember to do that.
But in this case, the well was completed in late 2011; tested late 2011; and went active in late 2013/early 2014. It wasn't until October 2014, that I made the entry as a reminder for me to follow up on this well at a later date.
But I can see the reason for the confusion.
This is a good reminder: I will often make mistakes. My shorthand method of tracking is inconsistent, hard to follow, but mostly intended for me to keep track of what's going on.