Updates
November 27, 2021: see comments. A reader cites a source saying these wells were re-fracked. I assumed they were; when the "jump" is this huge, it's "always" due to a re-frack.
Original Post
Alkali Creek is well known for wells with "halo effect," but this is unusual for Hess, reporting wells with "halo effect."
This well, huge increase in production:
- 23445, 1,127, Hess, EN-Pederson 154-94-0409H-5, Alkali Creek, t8/13; cum 35K 8/13; cum 300K 9/21; most recent sundry form back in 2019;
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 9-2021 | 30 | 24234 | 23973 | 16 | 1534 | 1269 | 265 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2021 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 7-2021 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 6-2021 | 4 | 129 | 212 | 73 | 314 | 314 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 5-2021 | 31 | 1772 | 1755 | 829 | 2902 | 2902 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 4-2021 | 17 | 1151 | 1126 | 457 | 1500 | 1500 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 3-2021 | 21 | 982 | 1062 | 428 | 1813 | 1813 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 2-2021 | 25 | 1491 | 1455 | 565 | 2110 | 2110 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 1-2021 | 27 | 1601 | 1607 | 715 | 2524 | 2524 | 0 |
This well, too early to tell, but certainly looks nice.
- 23446, 1,164, Hess, EN-Pederson 154-94-0409H-4, Alkali Creek, t7/13; cum 260K 10/20; cum 276K 92/1; 6,916 bbls over 12 days extrapolates to 17K over thirty days -- compare to 1,500 bbls before it went off line:
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 9-2021 | 12 | 6916 | 6841 | 13441 | 37648 | 37573 | 75 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2021 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 7-2021 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 6-2021 | 6 | 147 | 196 | 0 | 475 | 475 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 5-2021 | 31 | 1456 | 1449 | 219 | 3187 | 3187 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 4-2021 | 30 | 1004 | 1053 | 409 | 2358 | 2358 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 3-2021 | 31 | 1547 | 1516 | 452 | 3106 | 3106 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 2-2021 | 24 | 1057 | 1053 | 328 | 2015 | 2015 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 1-2021 | 25 | 1377 | 1347 | 391 | 2998 | 2998 | 0 |
Other wells on this six-well pad:
- 17099, taken off line 6/21; 355, Hess, EN-Pederson-154-94-0409H-1, Alkali Creek, t8/08; cum 189K 5/21;
- 23448, taken off line 6/21; 792, Hess, EN-Pederson-154-94-0409H-2, Alkali Creek, t1/13; cum 233K 5/21; also appears to have halo effect;
- 23447, taken off line 1/20; 829, Hess, EN-Pederson-154-94-0409H-3, Alkali Creek, t1/13; cum 225K 1/20; also appears to have halo effect; 4,393 bbls over 7 days, 9/21 extrapolates to 19K bbls over 30 days;
- 23444, PNC, Hess, EN-Pederson 154-94-0409H-6, Alkali Creek,
Your post on the CLR Tangsrud well caught my attention, as that is near where our mineral acres are located. If you remember, the Tangsrud wells were a big test plot for Continental where they drilled all the zones... This is a 3rd bench 3 Forks well. They gave it a good chance to show what it could do, but maybe just not feasable...? Also this is way north of the sweet spot in the Bakken. I don't know if they will drill up this far unless crude prices reach a certain point... I've been watching this carefully, some of the best wells up here are 3 Forks... interesting to see how things will go....
ReplyDeleteI was going to take a better look at the Tangsrud wells when the most recent one was in "the news" this week but I lost a bit of interest when another reader suggested not much to report. Maybe I'll take another look. We'll see. Continental Resources would have learned a lot just by drilling the wells.
DeleteThe Tangsrud wells are tracked here:
Deletehttps://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-tangsrud-wells.html
These wells were refracked according to FracFocus.
ReplyDeleteYes, I assumed they were.
Delete