Pages

Sunday, July 26, 2020

Currently, The Four Wells Of Most Interest -- July 26, 2020

Note: the neighboring wells remain off line:
  • 20529,
  • 20530,
The wells:
  • 34601, drl/A, MRO, Salveson USA 24-21H, 33-061-04204; Reunion Bay, t--; cum 170K 3.5 months; a 54K month; fracked 1/12/2020 - 1/26/2020, 8.3 million gallons of water; 99.99965% water by mass;
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-20203135603356452001752348050209
BAKKEN4-20203053827538954543765539062381
BAKKEN3-20202946754468204499052231049489
BAKKEN2-2020153399833589659744019303821
  • 34602, drl/A, MRO, Gerhardt USA 14-21H, 33-061-04205; Reunion Bay, t--; cum 145K 3 months; a 56K month; fracked 1/12/2020 - 2/10/2020; 7.7 million gallons of water; all water?
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-20203131310313521638543477041605
BAKKEN4-20203048352485153931058332055495
BAKKEN3-20203055850555494331259891056616
BAKKEN2-20205903889298337903008507

FracFocus, screenshots:

34601:

34602:



The five wells on that pad:
  • 34601, see above,
  • 34602, see above,
  • 34598, drl/NC, MRO, Hanlon USA 11-28TFH, 33-061-04201, Reunion Bay, t--; cum 92K 3 months; fracked 2/1/20 -2/10/20; 7.5 million gallons of water; no sand listed;
  • 34599, drl/NC, MRO, McRoberts USA 14-21TFH, 33-061-04202, Reunion Bay, t--; cum 101K 3.5 months; fracked 1/27/20 -2/10/20; 7.6 million gallons of water; no sand listed;
  • 34600, drl/NC, MRO, Verne USA 24-21TFH, 33-061-04203, Reunion Bay, t--; cum 160K 4 months; a 52K month; fracked 1/12/20 -1/25/20; 8.3 million gallons of water; no sand listed; water by mass, 99.99967%;

2 comments:

  1. Interesting, no question that Marathons new strategy include an increase in water volume, and now this? Pressure causes flow... so it seems to work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm still not sure what this all about. FracFocus may not have correct data, but that's hard to believe. The question is, if this is accurate, all water and no sand, what is going on? I have an idea but I don't want to waste time hypothesizing when there may be an error -- I really can't believe they did not use sand. But we'll see when the sundry forms are scanned by the NDIC and posted.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.