The Rule, Not The Exception, In The Bakken -- May 23, 2020

This is what makes the Bakken interesting, at least for me. Some time ago (I don't keep track of the dates, unfortunately, but one can sort it out in the production profile), this well was on the "AB" list -- temporarily abandoned. It was offline / no production from 6/18; to 8/19. At that time:

• 19940, AB/1,196, XTO, FBIR Yellowwolf 21X-10, Heart Butte, Bakken, s6/11; t1/12; cum 231K 9/15; inactive as of 6/18; remains inactive through 4/19;

Then, the well was brought back on line and turned out to be a nice well:

• 19940, 1,196, XTO, FBIR Yellowwolf 21X-10, Heart Butte, Bakken, s6/11; t1/12; cum 322K 3/20; cum 367K 7/22;
  

Recent production, after coming back on line:

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	3-2020	31	4319	4331	4188	2186	1798	370
BAKKEN	2-2020	29	4451	4435	4875	2426	2408	0
BAKKEN	1-2020	31	4846	4711	6985	2480	2250	211
BAKKEN	12-2019	8	1075	1044	2144	536	455	77
BAKKEN	11-2019	8	92	207	104	37	35	2
BAKKEN	10-2019	31	3355	3289	6759	592	390	199
BAKKEN	9-2019	2	148	95	3606	69	0	69
BAKKEN	8-2019	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Very few folks agree with me, but I believe this is "the rule" in the Bakken, not "the exception."

This particular well is on a 10-well pad just to the west of another 6-well pad.

I do not follow the Yellowwolf wells. If I get caught up, I may do so.

The FBIR Yellowwolf wells:

• 19940, FBIR Yellowwolf 21X-10, t1/12; cum 322K 3/20; cum 367K 7/22;
  
• 23938....21X-10A, t8/19; cum 104K 3/20; cum 294K 1/22; off line 2/22;
  
• 23942....21X-10E, t8/19; cum 63K 3/20; cum 226K 7/22;
  
• 23937....21X-10F, t8/19; cum 75K 3/20; cum 246K 7/22;
  
• 34685....31X-10C, t8/19; cum 181K 3/20; cum 375K 7/22;
  
• 34686....31X-10D, t8/19; cum 164K 3/20; cum 307K 7/2;
  
• 34687....31X019DXA, t8/19; cum 116K 3/20; cum 345K 7/22;
  
• 34688....31X-10G, t8/19; cum 94K 3/20; cum 245K 7/22;