ENB:
must have had a good earnings report; in pre-market trading, up about a percent. Headlines:
- higher crude transportation fuels Enbidge's profit beat; Reuters;
- Enbridge reports strong third quarter 2019 results; press release;
- dividend remains unchanged (reported two days ago)
Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, career, travel, job, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or think you may have read here.
**************************************
Back to the Bakken
Active rigs:
| $56.38 | 11/8/2019 | 11/08/2018 | 11/08/2017 | 11/08/2016 | 11/08/2015 |
|---|
| Active Rigs | 54 | 66 | 53 | 38 | 64 |
These wells are yet to report this week --
Friday, November 8, 2019: 28 for the month; 123 for the quarter:
-
35691, conf, CLR, Hereford Federal 15X-17HSL, Elm Tree, producing and a big well;
-
35440, conf, Hess, GO-Elvin Garfield-156-97-1918H-8, Dollar Joe, no production data,
Thursday, November 7, 2019: 26 for the month; 121 for the quarter:
-
36353, conf, Abraxas, Jore Yellowstone 2H, North Fork, no production data,
-
35441, conf, Hess, GO-Elvin Garfield 156-97-1918H-9, Dollar Joe, no production data,
-
35294, conf, BR, Prairie Rose 1A MBH-ULW, Corral Creek, producing, albeit not much;
Wednesday, November 6, 2019: 23 for the month; 118 for the quarter:
-
35437, conf, Hess, GO-Elvin Garfield 156-97-1918H-1, Dollar Joe, no production data,
-
35283, conf, Enerplus, Mulberry 149-93-21B-22H-TF, Mandaree, producing, a nice well;
-
34947, conf, Whiting, Moline 41-15-1H, Tyrone, producing, a nice well;
-
34926, conf, CLR, Collison 9-23H1, Avoca, another nice Collison well in the Avoca oil field;
RBN Energy:
could an Alaska North Slope LNG project undercut Gulf Coast competitors?
A number of proposed liquefaction plants and LNG export terminals along
the U.S. Gulf Coast are racing to secure regulatory approvals and line
up sales and purchase agreements, all in the hope of reaching final
investment decisions before their rivals. Yet, these Texas and Louisiana
projects now face competition from a facility that would be sited more
than 3,000 miles away, in the icy waters just off the North Slope of
Alaska. Qilak LNG would use a “near-shore” liquefaction plant in the
Beaufort Sea off Point Thomson, AK, to supercool the region’s nearby,
abundant and now largely stranded supplies of natural gas, load the
resulting LNG onto ice-breaking carriers, and use these carriers to make
shuttle runs to and from LNG customers in Asia. Today, we review the
Qilak LNG project and the economic and logistic rationales driving it.
The state of Alaska and producers along its North Slope near Prudhoe Bay
have a crude oil and natural gas problem on their hands. On the crude
side, production from the Alaska North Slope (ANS) region peaked at 2
MMb/d in 1988 — 11 years after the 2.1-MMb/d Trans Alaska Pipeline
System (TAPS) from the North Slope to Valdez, AK, was completed. Since
then, ANS oil output has been declining steadily; in 2018, it averaged
only 464 Mb/d, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA),
and in the first eight months of 2019, ANS production fell to less than
450 Mb/d.
As flows through TAPS ratchet down below 550 Mb/d, more and more
mitigation is needed to keep the oil moving through the pipe due to
freezing, wax buildup and other problems that come with lower flows.
Worse yet, if and when volumes on TAPS fall much below 350 Mb/d, all
bets would be off on whether the pipeline could continue to operate
without a major re-do.
Then there’s the gas conundrum. North Slope oil fields also produce
large volumes of associated gas, and while mixed NGLs can be removed
from the gas stream and sent down with the crude on TAPS, there’s no way
to market the remaining natural gas. The ANS gas is stranded. Literally
stuck in the middle of nowhere because plans for a big gas pipeline
from the North Slope to the Lower 48 never gained traction. Fortunately,
there’s been a good local use for the gas: every day, about 8 Bcf is
re-injected into the ANS oil fields to help maintain pressure and force
more oil to the surface. Enhanced oil recovery, in other words. But for
reasons too complicated to get into here, the re-injected gas does less
and less good as the amount of oil still in the ground declines.
With declining oil production — and declining state revenues from
that production — there’s been a big push on for several years now to
finally make use of at least some of the many trillions of cubic feet of
gas that have been re-injected into the ANS oil fields.
The state’s
Alaska Gasline Development Corp. (AGDC) and three energy companies
(ExxonMobil, BP and Conoco) had been working together
to advance the $45-billion-plus Alaska LNG project, which would process
2.5 Bcf/d of North Slope natural gas; transport it 800 miles through a
new, 42-inch-diameter pipeline to
Nikiski, AK, on Cook Inlet on the Kenai Peninsula south of Anchorage;
supercool the gas into LNG at a new three-train,
17.4-million-metric-ton-per-annum (MMtpa) liquefaction complex; and ship
the LNG to Asian buyers. In 2016, though, the three energy companies
decided not to provide financial support for the next phase of the
project (namely, front-end engineering design, or FEED), leaving AGDC as
the sole entity still working on it.
Which brings us to Qilak LNG, a North Slope liquefaction and LNG
export project that is being developed by an affiliate of Lloyds Energy.
(Qilak, an Inupiat word for the environment — land, sea and sky — is
pronounced KEE-lack.)
The proposed first phase of the project calls for
the development of a 4-MMtpa liquefaction plant that would be
constructed in a shipyard in Japan, South Korea or China, then floated
to a site a few miles off the coast of Point Thomson in waters deep
enough to receive large LNG carriers. The development of a second and
third plant of identical design off Prudhoe Bay, AK (just west of
Thomson Point) and the Mackenzie Delta (just across the Alaska-Canada
line Northwest Territories) is possible, if project economics and LNG
demand warrant.
Much more at the link.
