28117, BR, Johnson Corner and/or Pershing-Bakken, twenty (20) wells on a
2560-acre unit, section 15/22/27/34 -150-96; McKenzie County
Thinking out loud:
currently nine horizontals running north in a 1280-acre unit
currently nine horizontals running south in a 1280-acre unit
plan for ten more horizontals running north through those two sections: a total of 19 horizontals running north (but the new wells will be spaced at 2560-acre spacing)
plan for ten more horizontals running south through those two sections: a total of 19 horizontals running south (but the new wells will be spaced at 2560-acre spacing)
these are all middle Bakken and first bench Three Forks wells
lower benches of the Three Forks yet to targeted (may or may not happen)
many, many ways to look at density
one way: 1280 acres / 19 wells = 67 acres (MB and TF1 combined)
another way: 1280 acres / 10 wells = 128 acres (MB or TF1 separately)
another way: vertical array of 19 horizontals is still less than the 24 or more that some have proposed
another way: spacing between horizontals, horizontally: 5280 feet / 10 wells = ~ 500 feet
note: about two years into blogging about the Bakken I opined that fracking was effective out to 500 feet radially; something tells me I may be off by a factor of 2 before this is all over
Wells in the graphics (not all wells are in these 1280-acre or 2560-acre spacing units; some of the wells below lie outside these spacing units):
17529, 300, BR, Morgan 34-21H, Pershing, t2/09; cum 335K 7/19; off line as of 7/19; remains off line 8/19;
29872, 1,443, BR, Kirkland 41-28TFH, Pershing, t11/15; cum 201K 8/19;
29873, 2,084, BR, Kirkland 41-28MBH, Pershing, t11/15; cum 322K 8/19;
29874, 2,004, BR, Morgan 41-28MBH, Pershing, t11/15; cum 201K 8/19;
29875, 1,483, BR, Morgan 41-28TFH ULW, Pershing, t11/15; cum 262K 8/19;
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.