Pages

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Moderate US Crude Oil Draw -- EIA -- July 17, 2019

Yesterday, US retail sales, beat expectations, consumers making America great:
  • forecast: a measly 0.1% growth, month-over-month
  • actual: 0.4%
  • pundits keep telling us "we're" headed for a recession; that consumers are worn out; that tariffs are "killing" us -- oh, give me a break
EIA: weekly petroleum report out today -- for period ending July 12, 2019:
  • US weekly crude oil inventories: declined by 3.1 million bbls
  • US weekly crude oil inventories: 455.9 million bbls
  • US weekly crude oil inventories: 4% above five-year average and that five-year average is increasing
  • refining capacity: operating at 94.4% capacity; at high end of capacity; has been this way for several weeks now
  • see comments below and this link to the EIA pdf;
Re-balancing:
  • at week zero, 446.9 million bbls in storage
  • at week 34, 455.9 million bbls in storage, and I believe this is the second week (or thereabouts) that EIA has changed definition of oil in storage to make it more "realistic":
Week
Week Ending
Change
Million Bbls Storage
Week 0
November 21, 2018
4.9
446.9
Week 1
November 28, 2018
3.6
450.5
Week 2
December 6, 2018
-7.3
443.2
Week 3
December 12, 2018
-1.2
442.0
Week 4
December 19, 2018
-0.5
441.5
Week 5
December 28, 2018
0.0
441.4
Week 6
January 4, 2019
0.0
441.4
Week 7
January 9, 2019
-1.7
439.7
Week 8
January 16, 2019
-2.7
437.1
Week 9
January 24, 2019
8.0
445.0
Week 10
January 31, 2019
0.9
445.9
Week 11
February 6, 2019
1.3
447.2
Week 12
February 13, 2019
3.6
450.8
Week 13
February 21, 2019
3.7
454.5
Week 14
February 27, 2019
-8.6
445.9
Week 15
March 6, 2019
7.1
452.9
Week 16
March 13, 2019
-3.9
449.1
Week 17
March 20, 2019
-9.6
439.5
Week 18
March 27, 2019
2.8
442.3
Week 19
April 3, 2019
7.2
449.5
Week 20
April 10, 2019
7.0
456.5
Week 21
April 17, 2019
-1.4
455.2
Week 22
April 24, 2019
5.5
460.1
Week 23
May 1, 2019
9.9
470.6
Week 24
May 8, 2019
-4.0
466.6
Week 25
May 15, 2019
5.4
472.0
Week 26
May 22, 2019
4.7
476.8
Week 27
May 30, 2019
-0.3
476.5
Week 28
June 5, 2019
6.8
483.3
Week 29
June 12, 2019
2.2
485.5
Week 30
June 19, 2019
-3.1
482.4
Week 31
June 26, 2019
-12.8
469.6
Week 32
July 3, 2019
-1.1
468.5
Week 33
July 10, 2019
-9.5
459.0
Week 34
July 17, 2019
-3.1
455.9

**************************************
Best Quote Of The Day

"Occasional-Cortex: the reason there are instructions on the back of shampoo bottles."

****************************************
The Biology Page

I've blogged many times on Nick Lane's book, The Vital Question: Energy, Evolution, and the Origins of Complex Life, c. 2015. This book brought me up to date with regard to current advances in "thinking" about how life originated on earth (or maybe anywhere in the universe for that matter).

It was of interest, then, to have come across Nobel Laureate Jack Szostak and his thoughts on the origin of life and work in their laboratory in Boston/Harvar/MGH. This article is from 2017 but it is almost identical to a more recent article in a 2019 Harvard University publication.

The linked article begins:
With nearly 40 billion potentially habitable Earth-like exoplanets spinning around the solar system, it seems highly probable that astronomers would find life on at least one. Yet they have not.
“The pathway from chemistry to biology could be so hard that life is really rare,” said Jack W. Szostak, who won the 2009 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine. “In the laboratory, we want to find out if there is a simple pathway.”
Talk about an understatement.

Nick Lane does a great job dispelling the meme that electricity (lightning / thunderstorms) were instrumental in the origin of life on earth. It was interesting to see that Szostak still gives credence to that "theory" -- at least according to the author of the 2019 article.

5 comments:

  1. anyone catch how our crude production dropped?

    this week's crude oil production was reported to be 300,000 barrels per day lower at 12,000,000 barrels per day because the rounded estimate of the output from wells in the lower 48 states was 400,000 barrels per day lower at 11,500,000 barrels per day, while Alaska's oil production increased by 28,000 barrels per day to 455,000 barrels per day, which was enough to raise the final rounded national production total by 100,000 barrels per day (& that's the EIA's arithmetic, not mine)...

    you can see it here: https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/supply/weekly/pdf/table1.pdf

    also catch line 13, a 996,000 bpd swing in the 'unaccounted for crude' adjustment..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, it is the government "running" the numbers. LOL.

      Delete
    2. rereading that, it would have been clearer had i wrote "Alaska's oil production increased by 28,000 barrels per day to 455,000 barrels per day, which was enough to raise the final rounded national production total by 500,000 barrels per day to 12,000,000 barrels per day"

      the point is that they independently round production amounts from the lower 48 and from Alaska before adding them back together...what that means is that 12,000,000 barrels per day could actually mean as little as 11,902,000 barrels per day, or as much as 12,098,000 barrels per day, depending on what the pre-rounding amounts were in the subsets..

      Delete
    3. The same thing when retail outlets say something is 10% off -- do you pay sales tax on the whole, original amount, or just on the sale after the 10% is taken off. It never quits.

      Delete
  2. It's from Barry. Still a finger in the air, not a survey. But the do tweak the #s for hurricanes.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.