***************************
Stockyard Creek
There is a rig on site on this pad for these wells:
- 35170, loc, Zavanna, George 19-25 2HXW, Avoca,
- 29800, conf/rig on site, Zavanna, George 19-30 3TFHXW, Stockyard Creek,
- 29799, conf, Zavanna, George 19-30 4H, Stockyard Creek,
- 35171, drl, Zavanna, George 19-30 5TFH, Stockyard Creek,
- 35172, drl, Zavanna, George 19-30 6H, Stockyard Creek,
- 22044, 700, Zavanna, George 19-30 1H, Stockyard Creek, t10/12; cum 373K 6/18 -- off line as of 6/18;
- 35173, drl, Zavanna, George 19-30 7TFH, Stockyard Creek,
*******************************
Wheelock -- Northeast of Williston
Rig on site, completed wells running north:
- 33653, 1,270, Hess, GO-Vinger-156-98-2116H-5, Wheelock, t318; cum 93K 10/18;
- 33654, SI/NC, Hess, GO-Vinger-156-98-2116H-4, Wheelock, t--; cum 60K 10/8;
- 33655,1,087, Hess, GO-Vinger-156-98-2116H-3, Wheelock, t318; cum 92K 10/18;
- 33656, 1,100, Hess, GO-Vinger-156-98-2116H-2, Wheelock, t318; cum 83K 10/18;
- 34669, conf, Hess, GO-Bergstrom-156-98-2833H-5, Wheelock, no production data;
- 34670, conf, Hess, GO-Bergstrom-156-98-2833H-4, Wheelock, no production data;
- 34671, rig on site/conf, Hess, GO-Bergstrom-156-98-2833H-3, Wheelock, no production data;
- 34672, conf, Hess, GO-Bergstrom-156-98-2833H-2, Wheelock, no production data;
- 19398, running south, 1,945, Hess, Bergstrom 2-28H, Wheelock, t1/11; cum 181K 10/18;
- 20351, running north, 1,093, Hess, GO-Vinger-156-98-2116-1, t8/11; cum 246K 10/18;
************************************
Brooklyn Oil Field
Rig On Site
******************************************
I'm not finding GO-Vinger-156-98-2116H-6 on the state website when searching under Hess. On the maps I'm only finding Vinger 1-5. What am I missing here, is the Vinger-6 hiding elsewhere?
ReplyDeleteSorry about that. My mistake. A typographical error. I've corrected it up above. Again, I hope I didn't cause you too much anxiety -- or excitement thinking there might be another great Bakken well .... thank you for taking time to noting this -- I never would have caught that error.
ReplyDeleteGood to know. I was interested in how those Hess wells would perform and thought I might be missing something. There are so many wells it's not hard to make a mistake.
ReplyDeleteIf something doesn't make sense on the blog with regard to Bakken numbers, first thought: typographical error. Thank you for your understanding.
Delete