Random Update Of An Old Slawson Bazooka Well In Big Bend Oil Field -- June 5, 2018

Going back to the wells I first posted coming off the confidential list years ago, I will come across some interesting wells. Another example.

The well: FracFocus has no data to suggest this well was re-fracked. It was originally fracked back in 2009. The jump in production suggests it was re-fracked but FracFocus has no data to suggest that. In addition, there is no sundry form to suggest that it was re-fracked. This well does not appear on my "wells of interest" list, either. If one looks at the NDIC map, one will see a lot of fracking in the neighborhood of this well back in 2014. So, again, for newbies: this was another well that jumped in production after neighboring wells were fracked. Reason, of course, unknown why that happens, according to folks who write me about the phenomenon. [Later, for those with mineral rights, it is not important to know "why"this happen -- it's only important that it happens. LOL.]

• 18239,  1,042, Slawson, Bazooka 1-20H, Big Bend, t11/09; cum 342K 4/18 

Note jump in production in November, 2014:

BAKKEN	4-2015	30	4257	4446	2930	3213	3005	58
BAKKEN	3-2015	31	5364	5571	3954	3848	3693	0
BAKKEN	2-2015	28	6613	6704	4636	5696	5022	534
BAKKEN	1-2015	31	9401	8773	7771	8085	7204	726
BAKKEN	12-2014	31	11747	11888	11979	10097	9345	597
BAKKEN	11-2014	25	12401	12118	11437	10130	7863	2142
BAKKEN	10-2014	1	41	0	0	66	0	61
BAKKEN	9-2014	23	1833	1850	679	1623	1508	0
BAKKEN	8-2014	31	2666	3028	1398	2162	2007	0
BAKKEN	7-2014	31	2672	2739	1687	2273	2118	0
BAKKEN	6-2014	30	2072	1798	1821	1742	1592	0
BAKKEN	5-2014	31	2622	3093	1407	2282	2127	0
BAKKEN	4-2014	30	2513	2068	1352	1873	1723	0
BAKKEN	3-2014	31	2828	2722	1517	2232	2077	0
BAKKEN	2-2014	28	2642	2911	1524	1845	1705	0