Huge Jump In Production After Neighboring Well Fracked -- CLR -- Elm Tree -- June 5, 2017

Updates

August 27, 2017: production updated. 

Original Post 

On February 17, 2017, I wrote:

• February 7, 2017: #18224, huge well; went off-line 11/16; #30336 (API: 33-053-06616). Probably getting ready to frack nearby. A CLR Hendrickson well.

I just checked FracFocus and yes, indeed, #30336 was fracked in January, 2017. Pretty cool.

Monthly Production Data for #30336 (updated since original post):

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	8-2017	30	15615	15598	11511	26770	25832	906
BAKKEN	7-2017	31	16241	16346	13397	26694	25341	1330
BAKKEN	6-2017	30	20962	20996	16000	36023	31136	4861
BAKKEN	5-2017	31	25314	25110	19829	37093	33892	3174
BAKKEN	4-2017	18	15819	15646	13641	21435	21217	203
BAKKEN	3-2017	0	0	505	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	2-2017	2	1470	965	4336	2825	0	2825
BAKKEN	1-2017	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

What about the older, previously producing well, #18224 (API: 33-053-03040)? This is the production prior to #30336 being fracked and the production following that well being fracked:

• 18224, 960, CLR, Hendrickson 1-36H, Elm Tree, t12/09; cum 705K 7/18;

Monthly Production Data (#18224):

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	8-2017	31	18525	18942	13926	28888	25086	3567
BAKKEN	7-2017	31	12330	12168	13382	19280	17650	1430
BAKKEN	6-2017	30	16936	16845	17495	25895	24705	950
BAKKEN	5-2017	31	22186	22338	22567	39103	25885	12971
BAKKEN	4-2017	20	16275	15840	28381	22993	16226	6611
BAKKEN	3-2017	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	2-2017	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	1-2017	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	12-2016	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	11-2016	2	6	413	165	2	0	0
BAKKEN	10-2016	18	2274	2044	250	1971	1838	42
BAKKEN	9-2016	24	2179	2210	243	3522	3085	69
BAKKEN	8-2016	31	3126	3271	373	4668	3733	439
BAKKEN	7-2016	31	3001	2677	317	4554	3997	93
BAKKEN	6-2016	30	2975	2943	317	4212	3071	679
BAKKEN	5-2016	31	3154	3331	373	4901	4226	179

That's a huge production jump. Let's see if the well was re-fracked at the same time as #30366. FracFocus does not show any data that this well was re-fracked. In addition, there is no sundry form showing this well to have been re-fracked.

If, indeed, this well was not re-fracked, the jump in production is quite extraordinary after coming back on line.