Bakken 2.0: Another Well With Modest Bump In Production After Shut-In -- February 17, 2017

The well:

• 16327, 786, MRO, Benz 14-21H, t9/10; cum 281K 12/16:

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	12-2016	31	4556	4612	2055	5061	4072	323
BAKKEN	11-2016	30	3860	3824	1861	3286	2352	341
BAKKEN	10-2016	31	6696	6731	3136	6758	5187	668
BAKKEN	9-2016	30	6816	6844	3385	6450	4985	556
BAKKEN	8-2016	31	7385	7369	3856	6947	5405	566
BAKKEN	7-2016	31	7998	7977	4362	6321	4506	775
BAKKEN	6-2016	30	8109	8248	4684	5845	3545	1252
BAKKEN	5-2016	19	4474	4302	3699	3221	1670	961
BAKKEN	4-2016	8	160	166	402	110	54	3
BAKKEN	3-2016	4	4	0	528	18	0	0
BAKKEN	2-2016	1	38	18	25	25	0	18
BAKKEN	1-2016	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	12-2015	1	8	0	0	6	0	5
BAKKEN	11-2015	24	1359	1347	494	1380	995	99
BAKKEN	10-2015	31	1658	1681	584	1243	504	376
BAKKEN	9-2015	30	1699	1707	560	1164	188	614
BAKKEN	8-2015	31	1900	1837	568	1388	610	389
BAKKEN	7-2015	31	1828	1859	587	1259	379	500
BAKKEN	6-2015	30	1824	1944	603	1242	273	594

Graphic:

The graphic raises another obvious question. What about #16726?

*********************************

16726

Later. I completely missed this the first time when I was looking at the production profile for #16327. When I went to the map, I saw #16726, and I was curious about its production profile (I could almost guess). Here it is:

Pool	Date	Days	BBLS Oil	Runs	BBLS Water	MCF Prod	MCF Sold	Vent/Flare
BAKKEN	12-2016	31	4990	4997	2637	3952	3063	178
BAKKEN	11-2016	30	5380	5325	2566	4299	3446	97
BAKKEN	10-2016	31	5438	5522	2613	4200	758	2674
BAKKEN	9-2016	30	5453	5468	2568	3447	0	2683
BAKKEN	8-2016	31	4952	4883	2574	3399	731	1955
BAKKEN	7-2016	31	7432	7411	4057	5754	3949	826
BAKKEN	6-2016	30	7586	7665	4409	5648	3531	1125
BAKKEN	5-2016	31	7633	7566	4876	6067	3903	1161
BAKKEN	4-2016	30	7847	7866	5800	6417	5283	114
BAKKEN	3-2016	27	5016	5064	5541	4464	3270	516
BAKKEN	2-2016	29	11394	11279	11419	8858	4994	2476
BAKKEN	1-2016	5	581	706	124	373	0	290
BAKKEN	12-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	11-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	10-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	9-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	8-2015	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	7-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	6-2015	1	1	230	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	5-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	4-2015	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	3-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	2-2015	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
BAKKEN	1-2015	1	74	0	0	53	0	45
BAKKEN	12-2014	18	307	0	245	371	219	25
BAKKEN	11-2014	30	611	684	428	569	201	123
BAKKEN	10-2014	30	665	700	515	680	382	51
BAKKEN	9-2014	23	599	452	460	552	293	104

But in this case, it was a re-frack. It was fracked 12/10 - 12/2015, according to FracFocus. The file report shows that it was a 30-stage frack, 3 million lbs of sand re-frac. The reason this well was off-line so long was because a sundry report received November, 2014: "Marathon has decided to extend the lateral in this well prior to running a liner with frac sleeves in this wells beefore fe-fracing this well. The liner will be run from approximately 9,900' MD to the new TD at ~20,931' MD."

The initial frack was an open hole frack with 561,200 lbs of sand in late December, 2007.