Bakken As Laboratory -- May 5, 2015 -- Refracking May Not Be The Best Way To Go -- EOG

Reuters via Rigzone is reporting:

HOUSTON/WILLISTON, N.D., May 5 (Reuters) - Refracking, the practice of fracking an oil and gas well a second time, is still too unpredictable to rely on as a way to slash costs and increase output during the oil price slump, top U.S. shale oil executives said on Tuesday.

Oilfield service companies, including Schlumberger NV and Baker Hughes Inc., have touted refracking as a cheap way to revive output from existing shale wells. Output from existing wells, measured in barrels per day, normally drops as much as 70 percent in the year of operation. Also, some wells were not thoroughly fracked the first time.

But executives from producers say the refracking technology, while promising, remains tricky. "We have not tried any refracks. Our outlook on that is that it is really technical," said Bill Thomas, CEO of EOG Resources Inc., widely regarded as one of the most efficient U.S. shale oil producers.

"We believe that just drilling a new well, and kind of starting fresh ... is probably the preferred way to go." 

I like the byline: Houston/Williston, ND. Hoo-ahh!

But, then, of course, this article on Whiting's opportunity for re-fracks. 

Years ago when it took 45 days to drill a well, re-fracking looked like a better option. Now, when they can drill a well in 10 - 15 days, EOG/CEO may be completely correct. But whether one re-fracks, or starts all over, either way should be beneficial to the oil service companies.

The Bakken as laboratory.