Random Update Of Some CLR/Oakdale Wells -- July 29, 2014

Updates

December 30, 2017: a reader made this comment at another post regarding the Whitman wells -

Speaking of CLR, remember the Whitman wells in Oakdale field?

2-34H has produced 1.59 million barrels of oil since Sept 2011.

Drilling on 3-34H was stopped due to unsafe pressures and drilling conditions. It has finally been drilled to depth and completed. 61 stages, 14.5 million lbs proppant, 234 thousand barrels fluid. Production to date not impressive. At least not yet. 12,150 BBLS Oil in 21 days. 

Original Post

 

A reader happened to mention that he was not impressed with the Whitman wells and wondered why I didn't post the results of "all" the Whitman wells. I have posted the results of "all" the Whitman wells that have come off confidential list, but that's another story.

What piqued my interest was to hear that the Whitman wells did not impress him/her. So I went back and updated the wells in the general area of the Whitman wells when they were first making news. Here is the result of the update:

• 17061, 664, CLR/BR, Whitman 11-34H, 34-147-96, Oakdale, AL, t6/10; cum 436K 11/17;
• 17079, 559, CLR/BR, Carson Peak 44-2H, 2-146-96, Oakdale, AL, t6/08; cum 288K 11/17;
• 17334, 811, CLR, Morris 1-23H, 23-147-96, Oakdale, AL, t11/08; cum 270K 11/17;
• 18275, 1,020, CLR, Hawkinson 1-22H, 22-147-96, Oakdale, t2/10; cum 701K 11/17;
• 18858, 715, CLR, Morris 3-26H, 26-147-96, Oakdale, AL, t5/11; cum 458K 11/17;
• 18859, 680, CLR, Carson Peak 3-35H, 26-147-96, Oakdale, AL, t5/11; cum 636K 11/17;
• 18860, 517, CLR, Morris 2-26H, 26-147-96, Oakdale, AL, t5/11; cum 285K 11/17;
• 18861, 759, CLR, Carson Peak 2-35H, 26-147-96, Oakdale, AL, t5/11; cum 682K 11/17;
• 20208, 960, CLR, Hawkinson 2-27H, 34-147-96, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 443K 11/17;
• 20210, 803, CLR, Whitman 2-34H, 34-147-96, Oakdale, 4 sections, t9/11; cum 1.1595 million bbls 11/7
• 20211, 263, CLR, Hawkinson 3-27H, 34-147-96, Oakdale, 4 sections, t9/11; cum 385K 11/17;
• 20212, 482, CLR, Whitman 3-34H, 34-147-96, Oakdale, F, t9/11; cum 135K 11/17;(see comment above)

The original post is here: http://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2012/09/this-was-sent-to-me-as-comment.html

I generally don't update data in two different locations, so I will probably use the 09/2012 post as the post that will be updated.

To find the other Whitman /Hawkinson / Morris / etc wells, simply use the blog search app to find them. If they have come off the confidential list and reported by NDIC on a daily activity report, the results are posted on the blog. Guaranteed.

For newbies, in case you missed it, one of the Whitman wells has now produced more than 1,000,000 (one million) bbls. Another is up to 600,000 bbls after just four years. In contrast, it took 30 to 40 years for wells from other formations in the Williston Basin to reach these numbers. In addition, there are a lot of DRY wells when targeting other formations in the Williston Basin. There are "no" dry wells in the Bakken (regular readers know why I put the "no" in quotations).

I didn't notice this until now; some of the highly prolific Hawkinson/Whitman wells are still flowing without a pump (AL = artificial lift/pump). Teegue pointed out long ago that some wells listed as still flowing (F) may, in fact, be on a pump; sometimes the paperwork is slow in getting to the NDIC.

It's in the eyes of the beholder whether these are good wells or not.

I hope to repeat another posting regarding this subject -- something I've blogged about before -- if the spirit moves me and I find a slow day in the Bakken. I thought today was going to be a slow day and then everything hit right at the end of the day.

Oh, I had not even noticed that. Look at the IPs when you look at the total production of these wells.

**********************************

Back-of-the-Envelope 

My use only; not for general public

What does a 500K well mean for a mineral owner?

Let's say the mineral owner has 25 acres and the spacing unit is 2560 acres, which many of these are.

Let's say the mineral owner gets 20% royalties on all produced oil (I believe royalties generally run between 1/8th and 3/8ths).

Let's say the average price of oil was $75/bbl. My readers tell me that the better operators are averaging much better than $75/bbl.

So, for 500,000 bbls:

(25/2560) * 20% * $75 * 500,000 = $73,000.

Twenty-five acres is an extremely small holding; it would not be unusual for an original landowner to have one section (640 acres):

(640/2560) * 20% * $75 * 500,000 = $1,875,000.

And this well will keep producing for 30 more years (at a significantly lesser rate).

In addition, the mineral owner would have gotten the "bonus" for leasing the mineral acres in the first place, perhaps $2,000/acre, so before they even drilled a well, the 25-acre mineral owner would get $50,000 for the lease. The one-section owner would get $1,280,000.

Disclaimer: I often make simple arithmetic errors. I used a calculator but did not triple check all results.

Getting Ready For Tomorrow -- Posted July 29, 2014

Will GM need another bailout? Reuters is reporting:

General Motors  was hit Tuesday with a lawsuit brought on behalf of more than 650 people allegedly injured or killed in accidents involving cars that have been recalled this year for faulty ignition switches.

The lawsuit was filed in Manhattan federal court, where dozens of cases against GM over the switch recall have been consolidated. It names a total of 658 plaintiffs, including 29 who are bringing claims on behalf of people who died.

Since the beginning of the year, GM has recalled nearly 15 million vehicles worldwide over potentially defective ignition switches. The company has set up a program, run by lawyer Kenneth Feinberg, to compensate victims of crashes involving about 2.6 million of those cars, mostly Cobalts, Ions and other small cars that it linked to 54 crashes and 13 deaths.

Futures: futures mean "squat," of course, but it's always interesting to see where they stand. The "mini" Dow futures are up 23 points; and, WTI crude oil has stopped its free fall, rising slightly to just above $101. For mineral owners, the higher the price the better (in general), for investors, not necessarily so. One wants the price of oil to be in the sweet spot, near the bottom of the hedge/collar.

The Wall Street Journal

President Obama makes another speech. Headline story.

EU, US expand sanctions on Russia.

Twitter silences naysayers as users surge.

Consumer confidence rises.

Watch for tomorrow's GDP report.

Now that GOP leader Boehner said no more talk of impeachment, President Obama considers fewer deportations.

Highway bill a mess.

The road to New England (and the autobahn to Germany): President Barack Obama's proposed carbon-emissions rule for the nation's power plants will create new cost and reliabiltiy challenges for the US electricity system, according to federal energy regulators.
Now to worry: presidents come and go. Less than 910 days.

Top doc treating Ebola dies. Tragic loss.

Palestine without power after Israel strikes power plant; no one except the press notices.

HUGE STORY: IRS blesses telecom's REIT turn.

President Obama, Nobel Peace Prize winner, is sending more Hellfire missiles to Iraq.

The road to New England / the autobahn to Germany: German lighting manufacturer Osram licht plans to shed roughtly 7,800 jobs at home and abroad to save costs.

Amgen plans to cut workforce by 12% to 15% -- didn't we just see a survey that said American consumer confidence rises. Maybe not so fast.

China's stocks are soaring as investors scoop up investments in one of the world's cheapest markets.

The Los Angeles Journal

Out here in Los Angeles, homeowners are allowed to water their lawns for 8 minutes three nights a week. Golf courses have no restrictions except to water only at night, but unlimited amount of watering. And then a 1921-era water main breaks in west Los Angeles (Hollywood) and spilling more than 5 million gallons/hour. When I last checked, more than 10 million gallons of water had flooded the streets, UCLA's Pauley Pavilion, and nearby schools. Google LA flood for more.

Reporting Tomorrow

 Although some of may have changed their report dates.

Murphy Oil (MUR)
Phillips 66 (PSX)
Questar (STR)
Southern Company (SO)
Sprint (S)
Tenaris (TEN.MI)
Valero (VLO)
Whiting (WLL)
Williams Cos (WMB)

Five-Year-Production-By-Well; Rambling, Random Update Of The Very First 24 Wells That I Reported On, Coming Off The Confidential List -- July 29, 2014

The First 24 -- 1H2010

Since January 25, 2010, I have recorded every well that has been reported in North Dakota. The list starts here (1H10) (click on "the list starts here").

For the past couple of days, I've been updating the very first wells, the wells that were reported in 2010, which correctly or incorrectly I list as 1H10 (which is linked above).

It takes a lot of time to do this manually, but I do it because it gives me a "feel" for the Bakken. I haven't completely finished the list but I've done a lot of it, updating the total amount produced by each well as of 4/14 or 5/15, which at the time of updating was the most recent data available from the NDIC.

If one scrolls through the list, it is incredibly interesting all the things one can note. Randomly, in no particular order or importance attached to any of the data points. These are some things that jump out at me:

1. How incredibly young the Bakken boom is. These wells were all tested (which means they were spud not too much earlier -- 6 months or so) in 2009 or 2010.

2. How incredibly few permits, once issued, were cancelled.

3. How few -- as in almost "none" -- wells were DRY. As I said from the beginning: there are "no" dry Bakken wells.

4. The incredible difference in production among Bakken wells compared to Spearfish wells, compared to Madison wells, compared to wells from other formations.

5. They may not be dry, but are they economical. I've discussed that before also. Even low-producing wells serve a purpose, and in the "old" days any producer "held a lease by production." Not how few -- none -- of the wells are abandoned or plugged. They are all active. 

6. Many of the early wells were short laterals; now the standard is long laterals, twice as long. I don't necessarily buy into it, but some folks suggest that a horizontal well twice as long will produce twice as much oil as a horizontal half the length, all things being equal. Again, these are mostly short lateral wells. I think most of these wells, based on the operator (except for EOG) were long laterals.

7. These wells were drilled when time was of the essence, to save the leases before they expired.

8. The technology back in 2009 and 2010 was definitely much different than the technology in 2014. Regular readers know how much better the technology has become. In the beginning of the boom, we talked about one-stage fracks. Then 8 stages; then 12 stages; now up to 24, and 36, and 60 stages.

9. The decline rates are atrocious, but they are improving over time, as the technology gets better.

10. When these wells were being drilled, the companies were barely into delineating the Bakken. To some extent, these were all "wildcats," although not in the strict definition, but operators were still sorting things out.

11. I have data that goes all the way back to 2006 but that data is on Excel spreadsheets and not posted on the blog; maybe someday I will update data from the beginning of the boom, but manually it takes a long, long time.

12. I don't think it's a stretch to say that every one of these wells might have had three times the production by now had they all been long laterals (and maybe they all were long laterals; I haven't checked); and using all the new technology and better completion methods.

So, scroll through the wells at the link (1H10, above) to get a feeling of what went on back then and the total production to date.

Here are the very first wells I ever recorded at the blog as they were being reported. The names of the wells do not matter. The third column is the oil field; the fourth column is month/year when the well was tested; the fifth column was the month/year when I updated total production; the last column, in 1000's of bbls, is total production to date (fifth column).

These happen to be all Bakken wells. By this point in the Bakken boom, they were not drilling much else. But look at those cumulative production numbers (last column). 

18369	BEXP	Rosebud	1/10	5/14	187
18324	BEXP	Painted Woods	1/10	5/14	213
18232	Hunt	Ross	1/10	4/14	337
18014	Zavanna	Stony Creek	1/10	4/14	145
18082	WLL	Alger	7/9	4/14	110
17996	EOG	Burke	7/9	5/14	20
17972	EOG	Parshall	8/9	5/14	297
17933	EOG	Parshall	8/9	4/14	250
17828	EOG	Parshall	8/9	4/14	132
17727	EOG	Sanish	8/9	4/14	149
17984	OXY USA	Simon Butte	8/9	4/14	56
18188	Slawson	Van Hook	9/9	4/14	222
18153	MRO	Big Bend	9/9	4/14	290
18298	Whiting	Sanish	10/9	4/14	565
17080	Whiting	Sanish	10/9	4/14	369
18209	Murex	Sanish	11/9	4/14	443
18233	Whiting	Sanish	11/9	4/14	216
17881	Tracker	Little Knife	12/9	5/14	189
18214	EOG	Ross	12/9	4/14	175
18301	EOG	Parshall	12/9	4/14	108
18262	Hess	Manitou	12/9	4/14	213
18238	Murex	Sanish	12/9	5/14	377
18213	Whiting	Sanish	12/9	4/14	446

I consider, right or wrong, that the wells paid for themselves when they hit 100K bbls total production.

You know, seriously, take a look at those wells. They were not cherry-picked. They were the first 23 or 24 wells that were reported at that time (some were reported by the operator and are "out of order" -- in other words, the sequence will not agree with NDIC's database).

But there is nothing cherry-picked; just as I got them and recorded them.

Look at those total production numbers. Remember, the consensus is that Bakken wells will go on producing for 39 years. The oldest well in that list (07/2009) is less than five years old.

A long, long time ago I talked about initial production (the first year or so) and the EURs. I will talk about that in a later post.

But again, these are the very first wells I ever posted as they came off the confidential list back in 2010. Now that the Bakken boom is seven years old in North Dakota, we can start looking at total production and EURs.

Over time, I will continue to post updates, the next 24, the next 24 after that, etc.

*******************************

The First 30 Permits -- 2006

Now compare the wells above with the first 30 permits in 2006. (Remember: the Bakken boom began in 2007 in North Dakota):

16054	XTO/Headington		St Demetrius	10/6	5/14	32
16055	XTO/Headington		Capa	9/6	5/14	246
16056	Whiting	PNC	Duperow
16057	Whiting		Red River	4/7	5/14	7
16058	CLR		Tyler	7/6	5/14	23
16059	Petro-Hunt		Charlson	10/6	5/14	1444
16060	Whiting	PNC	Red River
16061	Berenergy		Madison	3/6	5/14	69
16062	Sinclair	TA	Red River	2/7	5/14	0.9
16063	Whiting		Birdbear	5/6	5/14	117
16064	CLR		Red River	8/10	5/14	42
16065	Onxy Oil	Dry	Madison
16066	Ballantyne	Dry	Madison
16067	Petro Harvester		Madison	8/8	5/14	60
16068	Whiting		Sanish	5/6	5/14	169
16069	Zenergy	Dry	Madison
16070	Oasis		Madison	4/6	5/14	57
16071	Armstrong		Duperow	1/6	5/14	93
16072	CLR		Midale/Nesson	3/6	5/14	85
16073	Kaiser-Francis	PNC	Duperow
16074	Jed Oil	PNC	Juno
16075	XTO		Bullsnake	6/6	5/14	62
16076	XTO		Mondak	6/6	5/14	66
16077	Slawson	Loc	Madison
16078	Kaiser-Francis		Duperow	5/6	5/14	28
16079	Kaiser-Francis	PNC	Duperow
16080	Hess		Beaver Lodge	6/6	5/14	28
16081	Whiting	PNC	Sanish
16082	Petro Harvester		Madison	2/6	5/14	166
16083	Hess		Capa	2/7	5/14	198

Comments:

Of the 30 wells listed above, 20 were non-Bakken wells.

Note how many non-Bakken wells were dry. There are "no" dry wells in the Bakken.

Note how poor most of  the non-Bakken wells turned out to be.

Note the Charlson Bakken well that has produced almost 1.5 million bbls of oil to date. 

*********************************

The First 30 Permits -- 2007

The North Dakota Bakken boom began in 2007. These are the first 30 permits (but again, not all drilled/completed in this order):

Whiting	TAO	Madison	6/7	5/14	0.1
Eagle		Madison	3/7	5/14	118
CLR		Red River	6/7	5/14	82
CLR		Chimney Butte	6/7	5/14	123
CLR		Corral Creek	4/7	5/14	277
Fidelity	IA	Pierre	8/7		0
Fidelity	NG	Pierre	8/7	5/14	0
Fidelity	NG	Pierre	8/7	5/14	0
Fidelity	NG	Pierre	8/7	5/14	0
Fidelity	NG	Pierre	8/7	5/14	0
CLR		Red River	4/7	5/14	84
CLR		Red River	6/1	5/14	118
Whiting	Dry	Red River
Panamerican		Madison	4/7	5/14	28
PDC	EXP	Madison
OXY/Ansbro		Willmen	5/7	5/14	48
OXY/Ansbro		Madison	6/7	5/14	38
Hess		Red River	10/7	5/14	2
Whiting	PNC	Madison
Upton	PNC	Tyler
Upton	TA	Tyler			0.3
CLR		Red River	7/7	5/14	185
CLR		Red River	7/7	5/14	222
CLR	IA	Red River	8/7	5/14	386
Zenergy	PNC	Madison
BR		Blue Buttes	6/7	5/14	180
EOG		Parshall	7/7	5/14	445
CLR		Red River	6/7	5/14	318
EOG		Parshall	5/8	5/14	366
Nance	Dry	Madison

Comments:

1. 24 of the 30 were non-Bakken wells.
2. The Red River has some incredibly good wells, and they are much less expensive to drill.
3. EOG is starting to hit on some huge Bakken wells.

*********************************

The First 30 Permits -- 2008

 

17000	CLR		Red River	12/9	5/14	254
17001	CLR		Red River	11/8	5/14	85
17002	CLR		Red River	12/8	5/14	34
17003	Kodiak		Twin Buttes	12/9	5/14	20
17004	CLR		Red River	6/8	5/14	94
17005	EOG		Parshall	7/8	5/14	369
17006	Samson	PNC	Baukol N
17007	Hess		Ross	5/8	5/14	130
17008	Marathon		Sanish	8/8	5/14	40
17009	Peak		McGregory Buttes	6/8	5/14	163
17010	Hess		Ross	5/8	5/14	132
17011	EOG		Parshall	8/8	5/14	415
17012	Hunt		Parshall	6/8	5/14	286
17013	Prima	IA	Midale/Nesson	7/8		47
17014	Hess	TA/ND	Wildcat
17015	XTO	IA	Manitou	7/8
17016	Armstrong	Dry	Madison
17017	XTO		Manitou	5/8	5/14	25
17018	Brigham		Alger	6/8	5/14	92
17019	EOG		Parshall	6/9	5/14	410
17020	Hess		Hawkeye	5/8	5/14	315
17021	Tracker		Murphy Creek	6/8	5/14	128
17022	Murex		Sanish	5/8	5/14	247
17023	Whiting		Sanish	5/8	5/14	683
17024	Peak		Mandaree	5/8	5/14	155
17025	PDC	PNC	Madison
17026	EOG		Parshall	10/9	5/14	50
17027	EOG	PNC	Wildcat
17028	EOG		Parshall	10/8	5/14	499

Comments:
1. We are now well into the Bakken boom which is just beginning.
2. Even so, 7 of 30 wells were non-Bakken wells.
3. Several of the Bakken wells have done very, very well (286K, 315K, 410K, 415K, 683K).
4. These wells are about 6 years old (as of 7/14).
5. Note again: almost every early Bakken well is still active; if nothing else, even these poorly performing wells hold the lease by production. I am told the rule of thumb in the Bakken is about $20,000/acre lease. If the company holds the lease, they are saving a ton of money.

*********************************

The First 30 Permits -- 2009

17946	Newfield		Fertile Valley	9/9	5/14	34
17947	Timberline	Dry	Madison
17948	Encore	PNC	Birdbear
17949	EOG		Stanley	7/9	5/14	51
17950	EOG		Alger	7/9	5/14	111
17951	EOG		Parshall	6/10	5/14	50
17952	SM Energy		Siverston	6/9	5/14	149
17953	XTO/Encore		Killdeer	4/10	5/14	265
17954	Hess		Manitou	7/9	5/14	84
17955	CLR	PNC	Wildcat
17956	Hess		Big Butte	8/9	5/14	169
17957	PDC	EXP	Madison
17958	PDC	EXP	Wildcat
17959	PDC		Lostwood	7/10	5/14	26
17960	Williston Hunter/Eagle	WI	Madison
17961	OXY/Anschutz		Simon Butte	2/10	5/14	100
17962	Hess		Ross	6/9	5/14	126
17963	Hess		Manitou	5/9	5/14	102
17964	Whiting		Sanish	6/9	5/14	124
17965	CLR		Mary	6/10	5/14	92
17966	Marathon		Reunion Bay	6/9	5/14	121
17967	Marathon	Dry	Murphy Creek
17968	Zenergy	PNC	Elidah
17969	Baytex (formerly Samson)	PNC	Ambrose
17970	BR	TF	Keene	4/9	5/14	146
17971	Marathon		Murphy Creek	9/9	5/14	118
17972	EOG		Parshall	8/9	5/14	297
17973	BR	IA	Camel Butte	11/9	5/14	160
17974	BR	TF	Keene	6/9	5/14	393
17975	Zenergy		Eagle Nest	7/9	5/14	77

Comments:
1. Although they have been drilling the Bakken for about two years, there is no dramatic change yet.
2. Even so, 4 of 30 wells were non-Bakken wells.
3. Only a couple of the wells are interesting; it shows the tenacity of the operators to keep spending huge amounts of money to figure out the Bakken.
4. These wells are still about 6 years old (as of 7/14).
5. We now see an occasional Three Forks well; surprisingly there was a dry Bakken well.
6. Note again: almost every early Bakken well is still active; if nothing else, even these poorly performing wells hold the lease by production. I am told the rule of thumb in the Bakken is about $20,000/acre lease. If the company holds the lease, they are saving a ton of money.

*********************************

The First 30 Permits -- 2010

18571	EOG		Clear Water	8/10	4/15	82
18572	Tracker	PNC	Little Knife
18573	XTO		Midway	7/10	4/15	115
18574	Slawson		Big Bend	12/10	4/15	172
18575	Slawson		Big Bend	6/11	4/15	298
18576	BR/Tracker		Little Knife	2/11	4/15	139
18577	Hunt		Ross	8/10	4/15	253
18578	Eagle		Madison	7/10	4/15	32
18579	SM Energy		Bear Den	12/10	4/15	363
18580	SM Energy		Dimmick	5/10	4/15	89
18581	Newfield		East Fork	4/11	4/15	75
18582	BR	Conf	Corral Creek
18583	XTO	EXP	Corral Creek
18584	CLR		Wildcat	7/10	4/15	90
18585	EOG		Ross	10/10	4/15	69
18586	CLR		Dolphin	7/10	4/15	134
18587	BEXP		Briar Creek	7/10	4/15	169
18588	Marathon		Bailey	6/10	5/14	111
18589	Slawson		Big Bend	5/10	5/14	407
18590	Slawson	IA	Big Bend	8/10	5/14	236
18591	Marathon		Murphy Creek	7/10	5/14	105
18592	EOG	PNC	Clear Water
18593	Oasis		Cottonwood	6/12	5/14	119
18594	EOG		Squaw Creek	9/10	5/14	128
18595	Slawson		Van Hook	7/10	5/14	318
18596	EOG	PNC	Clear Water
18597	EOG	PNC	Clear Water
18598	CLR		Hamlet	4/10	5/14	97
18599	Anschutz		Crooked Creek	1/11	5/14	105
18600	Cirque	EXP	Dimond

Comments:
1. Although they have been drilling the Bakken for about three years, there is no dramatic change yet.
2. However, now operators are drilling the Bakken almost exclusively; only one of the first 30 permits in 2010 was for a non-Bakken well.
3. Like 2009, only a couple of the wells are interesting, and then just barely; it shows the tenacity of the operators to keep spending huge amounts of money to figure out the Bakken.
4. These wells are still about 5 years old (as of 7/14).
5. The operators must be watching their permitted locations more closely; several Bakken permits were canceled.
6. Note again: every drilled Bakken well is still active. If nothing else, these performing wells hold the lease by production. I am told the rule of thumb in the Bakken is about $20,000/acre lease. If the company holds the lease, they are saving a ton of money.

*********************************

The First 30 Permits -- 2011

20247	Newfield	PNC	Fertile Valley
20248	Murex		West Bank	10/11	5/14	87
20249	Murex	Madison	Madison	8/11	5/14	7
20250	XTO		West Capa	3/13	5/14	127
20251	CLR/Samson Resources		Kinberly	12/11	5/14	67
20252	HRC/Petro-Hunt		Eagle Nest	6/12	5/14	80
20253	Petro-Hunt		Eagle Nest	6/12	5/14	243
20254	EOG		Parshall	12/11	5/14	215
20255	EOG		Parshall	4/12	5/14	221
20256	CLR		Little Knife	7/11	5/14	135
20257	KOG		Mandaree	4/14	5/14	35
20258	KOG		Mandaree	4/14	5/14	39
20259	KOG		Mandaree	4/14	5/14	16
20260	EOG		Ross	1/12	5/14	295
20261	CLR		Little Knife	8/11	5/14	60
20262	Hunt		Parshall	7/11	5/14	131
20263	Newfield		Fertile Valley	9/11	5/14	68
20264	Newfield	PNC	Bar Butte
20265	CLR		Jim Creek	9/11	5/14	78
20266	SM		Banks	3/12	5/14	82
20267	Slawson		Van Hook	9/11	5/14	279
20268	Prima		Rennie Lake	11/11	5/14	44
20269	Petro-Hunt		Four Bears	6/11	5/14	241
20270	Petro-Hunt		Pronghorn	8/11	5/14	118
20271	QEP		DWCB	12/11	5/14	130
20272	Hess/Tracker		Truax	10/11	5/14	166
20273	XTO		Heart Butte	9/12	5/14	153
20274	MRO		DWCB	11/11	5/14	191
20275	Oasis		Wildcat	7/11	5/14	186
20276	Enduro/Sequel		Flat Top Butte	4/12	5/14	29

Comments:
1. Although they have been drilling the Bakken for about four years now, maybe, just maybe we are starting to see a trend: consistently good wells, in the 150K - 200K range after three to four years of production. .
2. Operators are drilling the Bakken almost exclusively; one one of the first 30 permits in 2011 was for a non-Bakken well.
3. Be very careful in looking at the total production; this is the first year in which there is a wide disparity when the wells were completed/tested. Two of the wells were completed just a month ago (4/14).
5. DWCB: Deep Water Creek Bay.
6. Note again: every drilled Bakken well is still active. If nothing else, these performing wells hold the lease by production. I am told the rule of thumb in the Bakken is about $20,000/acre lease. If the company holds the lease, they are saving a ton of money.

Wells with permits issued in 2012 are too new to be added to this group yet.

The Obama Legacy: 400 Parts Per Million -- Oh, Not That One. This One: For First Time In US History, The Average Price Of Electricty Exceeds 14 Cents/KWH -- July 29, 2014

Two readers sent the link to this story "simultaneously" earlier today: the average price of electricity in US climbs to all-time record.

Electricity prices always peak in the summer but much of this year's increase is due to unnecessary political mandates. In every case in which CO2 emissions were invoked, the political mandates simply made "someone" feel better. If you don't believe me, check out the wiki site with regard to coal-fired plants around the world. The US is hardly in the hunt. It's all about China. Even the fact that Germany is now returning to coal is but a drop in the bucket, or perhaps a better analogy, a briquet in a 10-pound bag, I suppose, compared to what China is doing.

I went through the list yesterday and it was mind-boggling. My hunch is that not one elementary school teach who talks about global warming has ever gone through the list, line by line. I doubt Algore has even gone through the list. I had difficulty getting through the list, just trying to pronouce the Chinese names.

Now back to the first story linked above, the one that tells us that "the average price of electricity in US climbs to all-time record." I will bet that story will not be on any of the mainstream nightly news stations tonight.

The article begins (and has a nice graphic):

For the first time ever, the average price for a kilowatthour (KWH) of electricity in the United States has broken through the 14-cent mark, climbing to a record 14.3 cents in June, according to data released last week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Before this June, the highest the average price for a KWH had ever gone was 13.7 cents, the level it hit in June, July, August and September of last year.

If you like paying 14-cent-kwh, you can send a thank-you note to those you know who support wind and solar. Without wind and solar mandates, your utility bill would be trending down -- all things being equal, as I like to say. 

Americans will not complain about this (new record). First of all, they know how good they have it; some of the lowest rates in the world, and a very, very dependable grid. Knock on wood.

The interesting thing is that for many Americans, the percentage spent on electricity might be going down; I don't know. But electric appliances are becoming more and more efficient. Upper middle class, and to some extent middle class, are eating out more and more, cutting utility expenses associated with cooking, cleaning, and washing. Of course, if they are smart, they will also turn off the air conditioning while they are out, saving a few more pennies.

The few folks who have EVs can save money by charging them at work; if they live close enough to their job site, the round trip might be such they don't have to charge at home. The rich can even make money by installing solar panels and selling electricity back to the utilities.

The middle class will feel it a bit, but not enough to write their Congresswoman. The folks most affected are the lower middle class and the poor. There may be programs to help those folks who have difficulty paying their utility bills. If not, that's something the Federal government could start doing. I've always thought, everyone in the US should get "x" amount of water, electricity, and internet for free. And popcorn. And beverage of one's choice. Everything above "x" amount would then come at a price. People with incomes equal to or greater than that of Bill Gates or Warren Buffett would not be allowed to participate. In fact, they could subsidize the "x" amount for the rest of us.  In Warren's case, it would be in the form of Coca-Cola; in Bill's case, internet.

But I digress.

Hey, by the way, all those wind farms and solar farms -- there's a silver lining in those farms. I'm working on a blog regarding that silver lining but haven't had the energy to complete it.

Speaking of wind farms and solar farms: have you gone back and looked at the linked article: the average price of electricity in US climbs to all-time record?

Quick: after a gazillion dollars in subsidies, grants, crony capitalism, bankruptcies, and articles in The Los Angele Times, over the past twenty years, what percent of US electricity now comes from solar energy. Quick! Is it 5%, 15%, or 35%?

Okay, that was unfair. That was a trick. Even 5% was a bit too high.

Is it 1%, 2%, or  3%?

Okay, I know I'm going to be severely punished by Allah for teasing. One more time. What percent of US electricity now comes from solar energy? 0.1%, 0.3%, or 0.5%.

Yes, one of those answers is "almost" correct.

The answer is: 0.35%.

The 4,594 million KWH of electricity generated by solar power equaled 0.35 percent of the nation’s electricity supply in the first four months of the year.

Home-school children know what that means; for the rest of us, 0.35% is less than one-half of one percent.

You know, one almost wants to cry. I look at all the solar panels going up in southern California (I've seen one project) and all that work after 20 years results in less than one-half of one percent of all US electricity.

Okay, I have to admit, wind is much, much, much more important than solar by almost a factor of 200% -- or something like that. I've never understood "per cents" after we get above 100%.  But wind:

The 68,516 million KWH of electricity generated by wind in January through April equaled 5.2 percent of the nation’s electricity supply during that period.

So, about 5%.

So, that's a nice sound bite, easy to remember. From wind, the US gets about 5% of its electricity. From solar, zero percent. Think about that when First Solar hits a new high. Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment decisions based on what you read here or what you think you may have read here. And yes, I accumulate shares in First Solar. As some readers tell me, suckers are born every year. FSLR is off its highs but still doing okay. 

There's a lot of interesting information over at that linked article. The price of electricity looks a lot like the bull market in stocks. The largest rise in price of electricity occurred in the 70's and then in the last decade under President Obama. Who was the president 1973 - 1985 or thereabouts, I forget. Here they are: oh, there he is, Jimmy Carter, LOL, Who would have thought? Of course, rates also increased under Ronald Reagan but so did (almost) everyone's net worth. But what a coincidence: Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama.

From 2003 to 2013, the annual electricity price index increased from 139.5 to 200.750, a climb of almost 44 percent.

Coal?

I'm not going to do the math, but the percent of coal for generating electricity dropped about 15% from 2007 to 2014, due to the war on coal.

Most of the slack was taken up by natural gas. Nuclear energy also declined slightly, but going forward, my hunch is the nuclear energy decline will be even more significant.

Anyway, it's a great article to read.

US electricity from wind: 5%.

From solar: 0%.

Some numbers rounded.

Disclaimer: I often make simple arithmetic errors and often make typographical errors. I often misread and misinterpret what I read. That's why I provide the links. Some days I'm glad just to be alive.

Another link, same subject, at Investor Village.

Six (6) New Permits -- North Dakota; July 29, 2014; Oasis, Whiting With "High-IP" Wells; Ford To Switch To Apple; 5 Of 8 Wells To DRL Status; Only 2 Of 8 Report IPs

Big news of the day: Ford is switching to iPhone; Ford corporate enterprise will switch to Apple. Link here. This is a huge story on so many levels; remember the recent handshake between IBM and Apple. Ford is the first of many dominoes to fall. I believe the military "sort of" switched to Apple some years ago. 

The market: before the market pulled back this afternoon, these companies traded at new highs -- AAPL, ABAX, CTL, FTR, REX, T, WIN, XOM.

Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment decisions based on anything you read at this site, or think you may have read at this site. The telecoms had a great day. XOM trading at a new high, I think, surprised everyone.

Wells coming off the confidential list Wednesday:

• 24913, 2,424, Whiting, Roen 24-10-3H, Elk, t5/14; cum 15K 5/14;
• 26658, drl, SM Energy, Hank 13-7H, Poe, no production data,
• 26799, drl, Hess, SC-Tom-153-98-1514H-4, Truax, no production data,
• 26864, drl, XTO, Ruby State Federal 34X-36E, Grinnell, no production data,
• 27033, drl, CLR, McCoy 6-18H1, Northwest McGregor, no production data,
• 27057, 268, Hunt, Sioux Trail 160-101-36-25H-1, Sioux Trail, t4/14; cum 6K 5/14;
• 27077, drl, MRO, Vollmer 24-24TFH, Chimney Butte, Three Forks B-1, no production data,
• 27238, drl, Slawson, Waterbond 6-27-34TFH, Van Hook, no production data,

Active rigs:

	7/29/2014	07/29/2013	07/29/2013	07/29/2013	07/29/2012
Active Rigs	192	179	179	179	207

Six (6) new permits --

• Operators: Hess (3), CLR (2), Legacy
• Fields: Ray (Williams), Camel Butte (McKenzie), North Souris (Bottineau)
• Comments:

Wells coming off the confidential list today were posted earlier; see sidebar at the right.

Four (4) producing wells completed:

• 23544, 1,221, Statoil, Albert B. 27 34-4TFH, Nameless, t6/14; no production data;
• 26888, 2,443, Oasis, Brier 520044-22 5T, Camp, t6/14; no production data, spacing ICO
• 27135, 1,680, BR, Norman 21-4MBH, Johnson Corner 4 sections, t7/14; cum --
• 27231, 365, Whiting, Waldock Federal 14-4-3XH, Sanish, t7/14; cum -- , spacing ICO; total depth reached in 14 days from spud; gas units as high as 1,733; no problems while drilling; IP?