With
limited pipeline infrastructure available to transport oil to
refineries – and the downsides of greenhouse gas emissions, fuel costs
and road damage resulting from hauling fuel by truck – the oil and gas
industry does not have many other options available for transporting
crude oil, said Ankur Jajoo, environmental industry analyst with Frost
& Sullivan, in an interview with Rigzone.
“The energy industry as a whole works on the economics. Whether it’s
upstream, midstream or downstream, transportation is a key area for
reducing costs. The industry looks to save where it can. If using rail
is more economic versus trucks, then that is what companies will use,”
said Ankur Jajoo, environmental industry analyst with Frost &
Sullivan, in an interview with Rigzone.
Barring any significant developments, rail will continue to be widely
used over the next several years, given the amount of time needed to
construct pipeline infrastructure and bring it online. The key challenge
for industry is that the North Dakota incident is the second rail
disaster in the past year or so.
The surge in Canadian oil sands production and U.S. unconventional oil
production over the past five years, which severely stressed North
America’s transportation infrastructure and caused quality dislocations
and price disparities for benchmark crudes, created supply and demand
imbalances and logistical bottlenecks indicate a need for better
long-term pipeline solutions and a more efficient pipeline network,
according to a 2013 Ernst & Young report.
However, pipeline permitting and construction delays and pricing
incentives have resulted in railways becoming a serviceable
transportation option for inland crudes. While not a replacement for
pipelines, it is positioned to grow and will remain as a long-term
strategic complement or supplement to pipelines.
“Given the optionality on destinations that rail has created, producers
are increasingly reluctant to commit volumes to new pipelines,”
according to the Ernst & Young report.
“Rail has allowed producers
to link inland prices to a broader set of benchmarks than just West
Texas Intermediate amid a very dynamic pricing environment.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.