- 21526, 854, Hess, BW-Erler 149-99-1522H-1, Cherry Creek, t9/12; cum 32K 9/12;
- 21910, 842, Baytex, Lokken 1-12-161-98H 1BP, Whiteaker, t5/12; cum 42K 9/12;
- 21911, 436, Baytex, Lokken 36-25-162-98H 1XB, Whiteaker, t5/12; cum 35K 9/12;
- 21948, 56, Baytex, Bentson 25-36-161-98H 1AP, Moraine, t5/12; cum 12K 9/12;
- 22124, 342, Baytex, Bentson 24-13-161-98H 1XB, Whiteaker, t5/12; cum 22K 9/12;
- 22681, 2,298, XTO, Roxy 21X-6B, West Capa, t8/12; cum 37K 9/12;
- 22811, 457, CLR, Sefolosha 1-14H, Epping, t7/12; cum 36K 9/12;
For the Hess well, "BW" = Buffalo Wallow, central McKenzie County.
XTO's Roxy well:
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 9-2012 | 30 | 12486 | 12396 | 2750 | 15551 | 374 | 15177 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 30 | 24988 | 24825 | 13655 | 30354 | 4146 | 26150 |
| BAKKEN | 7-2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nothing really new in regards to North Dakota oil development but I thought it was interesting that Special Report with Bret Baier did a segment on it.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/13/dip-in-oil-prices-poses-possible-threat-to-north-dakota-bakken-shale-formation/
You are correct: this issue comes up periodically.
DeleteMan what a difference in ips !!! Bruce do you think they hit a good pocket or they're just getting better at it?
ReplyDeleteFour possibilities: a) luck; b) better natural fracking; c) higher pressure d) Baytex is getting better.
DeleteI'll have to go back and compare location of these wells with other Baytex wells, but these are certainly out of the norm for Baytex. If in very same area as other "more" typical Baytex wells, then one almost has to give credit to their team for better IPs. Time will tell, I suppose, and perhaps there will be some additional information yet to come.