Pages

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Public Television: General Custer Beyond the LBH -- Nothing To Do With The Bakken

Public television is telecasting a new story of General George Armstrong Custer. When reading the review in the Boston Globe, I am reminded of another George.
The remarkable thing is that it took so long for George Armstrong Custer to lose his luster. He and much of the 7th Cavalry he commanded died at the Battle of the Little Bighorn on June 25, 1876. Despite that, Custer was seen as a hero for nearly a century - a martyr to the cause of settling the American West. Why that was so, and why that view came to change so radically, is examined tonight with skill and insight in “Custer’s Last Stand.’’ The two-hour documentary, written and directed by Stephen Ives, is part of PBS’s “American Experience.’’

Custer cut a storybook figure. Having finished last in his class at the US Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., he was a brigadier general in the Union Army at 23. His courage and flair and leadership qualities on the battlefield were that impressive. General Philip Sheridan wrote to Custer’s wife [Libbie]: “Permit me to say, madam, that there is scarcely an individual in our service who has contributed more to bring about this desired result [of Union victory] than your gallant husband.’’
It looks promising. I will probably miss it.  I will be reading to my granddaughters. Can't wait.

By the way, Libby, Montana, was not named after General Custer's wife (spelled differently; too far away from where the general rode). Libby, Montana, was named after the daughter of an early settler according to the town's website.

4 comments:

  1. I taped it, I enjoyed last weeks on Billy the Kid.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't have TiVo.

    There was an interesting discussion some time ago suggesting why Apple excelled; TiVo never truly caught on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I saw (or for the most part listened to) the second hour of the show on the kitchen TV. The story is pretty well known so not a lot that is new. The basic theme was that before this Custer was a "hero" without a substantial income from it so he was hoping to make one last big "splash". In this final campaign he was aloof from his troops and the others in his battle group. Basically there were far more Indians than Custer had thought and the other two battle groups were not "inspired" to come to Custer's aid during the main battle.

    Moderately "PC". but not as bad as I had expected.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That summary meshes nicely with what I know about this battle.

      Perhaps I would have been interested in the information/interpretation of information that suggests the other two groups were not "inspired" to come to his aid.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.