Pages

Monday, August 29, 2011

Excellent Story on States' Fiscal Status -- Some Bakken-Related Notes -- Bakken, North Dakota, USA

Link here.

Very long story here with lots of information. Buried in the story is this nugget:
Tax-collection growth is where the rubber meets the road for most states. Many of the stars in this respect are benefiting from rising prices for oil, food and minerals. North Dakota had a 46% jump in first-quarter fiscal 2011 collections, boosted by exploitation of the gas- and oil-rich Bakken shale shelf. Alaska, with its tax take up by 16.7%, likewise benefited from higher oil prices.
Other states:
Particularly shaky are states like Illinois, with only 51% of its pension obligations funded, and California, with 81%. Their dysfunctional state governments, allied with public-employee unions, are seemingly incapable of making needed reforms. Several times in recent years, Illinois has floated bond issues to make its pension contributions, only to find that it paid more in interest on them than it made on its investments.
And, of course, the obligatory slam on the previous president:
Florida, Nevada, Arizona and California still have big mortgage problems, stemming from the faux housing boom of the George W. Bush years. That encouraged local governments to wildly expand, using soaring property-tax revenue, and individuals to spend more, by taking out home-equity loans. When the boom ended, the spending did, too, and joblessness soared. Based on June numbers, the states with the worst jobless rates were Florida (10.6%), and Michigan and South Carolina (both 10.5%).
I thought Nevada had the worst jobless rate: 14% in June; down to 12.9% in July.

2 comments:

  1. I'm not a defender of any party. But if you actually research, you'll find the mortgage mess started during Bill Clinton's terms. He aspired to easing of credit terms so low-income wage earners could live the american dream of home ownership. You will find most of the deregulation of mortgages began during the Clinton years as a result of his pet project.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are correct, although it was not "deregulation" in my eyes, but rather a concerted effort to encourage home buying in irresponsible ways.

    But I won't argue with you. We are probably pretty close to the same page on this.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.